"BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP - IT'S "ALL OVER RED ROVER" SCOTUS WILL RULE IN FAVOUR OF TRUMP

[FastLane]

Correct. There were many people with many misconceptions.


They were born in the US, were citizens per the 14th Amendment, and yet somehow still required clarification of their status due to the many people with their many misconception.


They were also in the same situation as Ark.


There is no such thing as Salvadoran children born in the US. You are referring to American citizens being born in the US.


No act of Congress can grant citizenship.

Yes, Congress has the power to grant citizenship through its naturalization power, as established in the Constitution. This power allows Congress to define the rules and requirements for individuals to become citizens after birth, essentially through a process called naturalization.

can congress grant citizenship - Google Search

 

[FastLane]

Correct. There were many people with many misconceptions.


They were born in the US, were citizens per the 14th Amendment, and yet somehow still required clarification of their status due to the many people with their many misconception.


They were also in the same situation as Ark.


There is no such thing as Salvadoran children born in the US. You are referring to American citizens being born in the US.


No act of Congress can grant citizenship.

Yes, the Snyder Act, officially the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, granted citizenship to all Native Americans born within the territorial limits of the United States. It was signed into law by President Calvin Coolidge on June 2, 1924.

 

[IBDaMann]

Because I have read their reasons for doing what they did.

... as have I, and you err.

No, I'm too smart to believe your lies.

You're too quick for me to pull the Constitution over your eyes.

Well it does not need to be repealed since it was never Constitutional in the first place.

Let's see, the Constitutional Amendment that was ratified in 1868 ... was never Constitutional. You are wise beyond your years.

The SCOTUS will be hearing arguments beginning May 15th. How long it takes for their decision I don't know.

It does not matter how long SCOTUS requires to make the decision to leave birthright citizenship intact, we already know today what that decision will be.

 

[IBDaMann]

Yes, Congress has the power to grant citizenship through its naturalization power, as established in the Constitution.

I stand corrected. Yes. I was not considering naturalization. Thank you for keeping me honest.

I was referring to Congress' inability to grant inalienable rights that precede the Constitution, e.g. citizenship by birth.

 

[IBDaMann]

So you say.

I do. History shows me to be correct.

You think the SCOTUS made a mistake with the Elk decision.

Yep. Congress had to step in and correct the mistake.

I think the educated and experiences Justices got it right and you are full of shit.

History stands against you.

 

[FastLane]

I do. History shows me to be correct.


Yep. Congress had to step in and correct the mistake.


History stands against you.

History says the SCOTUS says people born owing allegiance to another country are not US citizens.

 

[FastLane]

... as have I, and you err.

I did??? Sure looks like you err. What did the SCOTUS mean when they said:

.
The law upon the question before us has been well stated by Judge Deady in the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon. In giving judgment against the plaintiff in a case resembling the case at bar, he said:

"Being born a member of 'an independent political community' -- the Chinook -- he was not born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States -- not born in its allegiance."

You're too quick for me to pull the Constitution over your eyes.

I am not going to believe your lies about what you twist the Constitution to say.

Let's see, the Constitutional Amendment that was ratified in 1868 ... was never Constitutional. You are wise beyond your years.

It excludes those born owing allegiance to other governments.

It does not matter how long SCOTUS requires to make the decision to leave birthright citizenship intact, we already know today what that decision will be.

Yes it will be the same as the decision SCOTUS made in Elk v Wilkins if Roberts sticks to his guns..

 

[FastLane]

I stand corrected. Yes. I was not considering naturalization. Thank you for keeping me honest.

I was referring to Congress' inability to grant inalienable rights that precede the Constitution, e.g. citizenship by birth.

Illegal Aliens don't have an inalienable right to be an American. It is a privilege for some aliens to become Americans not an inalienable right.