Bill Nye, 'Science Guy,' condemns creationist influence in classrooms

no, I think it was one month ago...but Baxter keeps starting threads bringing the same stuff up over and over... what can I say.....

No, you drag every argument off into this topic with your lies and attempts to deceive.

Let's recap. I or someone else points out how many are misleading children by teaching them to reject science, filling their heads with nonsense about evolution and wanting to teach the rejection of science in a science class. In this case the young earth/human nonsense. You claim that no one has ever suggested teaching these things and just a handful believe such things. Then I show you course materials that include such things and the poll numbers about how many do actually believe this. Then you try to deny what the polls clearly show. Eventually, you acknowledge that you do think such nonsense should be taught in a science class and make some idiotic claim that science really promotes atheism.

Ditzy used to employ the EXACT same tactics.

There is nothing wrong with the poll. They provided three answers. One that fits the science while claiming God guided the process; one that fits the science while denying that God played any role; and one that completely rejects the science for biblical fairy tales. The answers accurataely represent that an overwhleming plurality rejects science. Maybe SOME of them actually do believe god created man in his present form 125000 years ago. It still does not change the fact that they reject the scientific evidence to make that claim.
 
Last edited:
And one of the answers that fit the science included God. But instead 46% went with lying morons like you and Ham and rejected the science. That was my point.

both the other answers stated that human beings evolved from less advanced creatures.....you BELIEVE science proves that, but it doesn't.....
 
both the other answers stated that human beings evolved from less advanced creatures.....you BELIEVE science proves that, but it doesn't.....

Less advanced??? There you go showing your ignorance and another source of your block, arrogance.

Of course, it does show we evolved from other species.
 
certainly....but not what YOU believe about evolution.....

Bullshit. I don't reject any part of the well established evidence. You cherry pick it and try to force it to fit your biblical fairy tales. What you are doing is not science.

You think you are more rational than Ham, but you are just less honest and willing to reject even your own Bible, which tells you not to add or subtract from it. You do this to salvage what many theologians accept as just fairy tale. You can't tolerate the idea that the Bible has to be taken with a grain of salt, should be read for overarching general themes and it's wisdom tested against improved modern moral sentiments. You need something you can beat others over the head with and incite mobs filled with righteous certainty.

I don't even believe you are a Christian. You are one of the jackass Pharisees Chirst opposed.
 
Last edited:
gw-destroy-half.jpg
 
Back
Top