BIG BOY CHAMBER

Getin the ring

Verified User
Ok, nut-bags,
crazy how none of the nut-bags ever start a thread about really BAD nut-bag news

so, as a courtesy

President Trump late Tuesday congratulated incumbent Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith for handily defeating an insurgent challenge by Democrat Mike Espy in Mississippi's contentious special election runoff to become the first woman ever elected to Congress from the state


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/po...l-election-runoff-between-hyde-smith-and-espy

can't wait for the lower chamber to send some of that America first legislation (like that will ever happen) up to the big boy chamber for consideration.

Trump was right, I AM getting tired of all this winning
 
Ok, nut-bags,
crazy how none of the nut-bags ever start a thread about really BAD nut-bag news

so, as a courtesy

President Trump late Tuesday congratulated incumbent Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith for handily defeating an insurgent challenge by Democrat Mike Espy in Mississippi's contentious special election runoff to become the first woman ever elected to Congress from the state


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/po...l-election-runoff-between-hyde-smith-and-espy

can't wait for the lower chamber to send some of that America first legislation (like that will ever happen) up to the big boy chamber for consideration.

Trump was right, I AM getting tired of all this winning

It was a piss pure result with only 2 seats added after having to defend only 9 seats while the dems had to defend 24. A piss poor result and as you may have red, Texas is now becoming a purple state. Oh my!
 
It was a piss pure result with only 2 seats added after having to defend only 9 seats while the dems had to defend 24. A piss poor result and as you may have red, Texas is now becoming a purple state. Oh my!

whatever you say nut-bag

how is it that Obama lost 6 seats in the Senate first mid term, and 63 seats in the house?
you have some strange criteria for victory

low bar low expectations huh? :rofl2:

A Republican wins in Deep Red State Mississippi. SHOCKER!

you sound like Chris Cuomo :rofl2:, speaking of he doesn't look well lately, I think Trump is effecting his sleep

must be nice to have a mind set, and thought process that no matter what happens, it's good news for you
like living in OZ I bet
 
whatever you say nut-bag

how is it that Obama lost 6 seats in the Senate first mid term, and 63 seats in the house?
you have some strange criteria for victory

low bar low expectations huh? :rofl2:

This past election democrats set a new record for the margin of victory as well as number of votes. Eat you heart out. It was a devastating loss for republicans and ever better, its gonna happen again next time.
 
It was a piss pure result with only 2 seats added after having to defend only 9 seats while the dems had to defend 24. A piss poor result and as you may have red, Texas is now becoming a purple state. Oh my!

Those 2 seats will ensure when Ginsburg keels over and does the country a favor that Trump will get a 3rd pick for the Court. Your children's children will be older than Ginsburg before it even has a chance of leaning left again.
 
Miss. has had only one repub governor from 1876 until 2004 :palm:

please dog, do NOT confuse them with facts

The FACT that liberals are all giddy over picking up house majority, is all you need to know about the level of their desperation.

Trump may have actually preferred a Democrat controlled house, now they have to send over some legislation, immigration reform being front and center.
What trump expects, as will in all likelihood be the case, is nothing from them except more calls for investigations. So in 2020 GOP pickups in both houses, as well as Trump II is all but certain.

I tell you this Trump guy gets smarter by the day
 
Ok, nut-bags,
crazy how none of the nut-bags ever start a thread about really BAD nut-bag news

so, as a courtesy

President Trump late Tuesday congratulated incumbent Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith for handily defeating an insurgent challenge by Democrat Mike Espy in Mississippi's contentious special election runoff to become the first woman ever elected to Congress from the state


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/po...l-election-runoff-between-hyde-smith-and-espy

can't wait for the lower chamber to send some of that America first legislation (like that will ever happen) up to the big boy chamber for consideration.

Trump was right, I AM getting tired of all this winning

That's like getting all excited cause Alabama or Clemson beat the Little Sisters of the Poor in college football

Embarrassing part is that Trump had to make a special trip to what should have been a gimme election to save a GOP seat in a ruby read State

And let's not forget, legislation has to initiate or pass thru the House before it becomes a law, so Trump's agenda, what ever the hell that is, is at the Democrat's leasure in thirty days
 
That's like getting all excited cause Alabama or Clemson beat the Little Sisters of the Poor in college football

Embarrassing part is that Trump had to make a special trip to what should have been a gimme election to save a GOP seat in a ruby read State

And let's not forget, legislation has to initiate or pass thru the House before it becomes a law, so Trump's agenda, what ever the hell that is, is at the Democrat's leasure in thirty days

two words

Executive Order :rofl2:
 
please dog, do NOT confuse them with facts

The FACT that liberals are all giddy over picking up house majority, is all you need to know about the level of their desperation.

Trump may have actually preferred a Democrat controlled house, now they have to send over some legislation, immigration reform being front and center.
What trump expects, as will in all likelihood be the case, is nothing from them except more calls for investigations. So in 2020 GOP pickups in both houses, as well as Trump II is all but certain.

I tell you this Trump guy gets smarter by the day

I do think that dealing with a Dem house is less problematic for DJT than dealing with deceitful RINOs like McCain.

And Trump knows Pelosi is a deal maker and can help get things done.
 
whatever you say nut-bag

how is it that Obama lost 6 seats in the Senate first mid term, and 63 seats in the house?
you have some strange criteria for victory

low bar low expectations huh? :rofl2:



you sound like Chris Cuomo :rofl2:, speaking of he doesn't look well lately, I think Trump is effecting his sleep

must be nice to have a mind set, and thought process that no matter what happens, it's good news for you
like living in OZ I bet

Political discourse in america.
 
Drain the swamp!

https://www.propublica.org/article/...rules-let-lobbyist-help-run-agency-he-lobbied

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/12/...s-now-theyre-on-his-transition-team.html?_r=0

http://time.com/donald-trump-drain-swamp/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...7d93165c6d4_story.html?utm_term=.c6f6ade76246

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-...ry-lobbyist-to-hud-transition-team-1480453288

https://theintercept.com/2017/01/27/coal-doj-trump/

http://fortune.com/2016/11/16/trump-lobbyists-dc-establishment/


Another of Don’s Swamp Rats Bails …

... just before publication of this New Yorker article.

Icahn’s role was novel. He would be an adviser with a formal title, but he would not receive a salary, and he would not be required to divest himself of any of his holdings, or to make any disclosures about potential conflicts of interest. “Carl Icahn will be advising the President in his individual capacity,” Trump’s transition team asserted.

In the months after the election, the stock price of CVR, Icahn’s refiner, nearly doubled—a surge that is difficult to explain without acknowledging the appointment of the company’s lead shareholder to a White House position. The rally meant a personal benefit for Icahn, at least on paper, of half a billion dollars. There was an expectation in the market—an expectation created, in part, by Icahn’s own remarks—that, with Trump in the White House and Icahn playing consigliere, the rules were about to change, and not just at the E.P.A. Icahn’s empire ranges across many economic sectors, from energy to pharmaceuticals to auto supplies to mining, and all of them are governed by the types of regulations about which he would now potentially be advising Trump.

Janet McCabe, who left the E.P.A. in January, and now works at the Environmental Law and Policy Center, told me, “I’m not naïve. People in business try to influence the government. But the job of the government is to serve the American people, not the specific business interests of the President’s friends. To think that you have somebody with that kind of agenda bending the President’s ear is troubling.”

Conflicts of interest have been a defining trait of the Trump Administration. The President has not only refused to release his tax returns; he has declined to divest from his companies, instead putting them in a trust managed by his children. Questions have emerged about the ongoing business ties of his daughter and son-in-law, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, who, since Trump took office, have reaped nearly two hundred million dollars from the Trump hotel in Washington, D.C., and from other investments. Although Trump promised to “drain the swamp,” he has assembled a Cabinet of ultra-rich Americans, including two billionaires: Betsy DeVos, the Secretary of Education, and Wilbur Ross, the Secretary of Commerce.

But Icahn is worth more than the Trump family and all the members of the Cabinet combined—and, with no constraint on his license to counsel the President on regulations that might help his businesses, he was poised to become much richer. Robert Weissman, who runs the watchdog group Public Citizen, told me, “This kind of self-enrichment and influence over decision-making by an individual mogul who is simultaneously inside and outside the Administration is unprecedented. In terms of corruption, there’s nothing like it. Maybe ever.” In conversations with me, financiers who have worked with Icahn described his appointment as a kind of corporate raid on Washington. One said, “It’s the cheapest takeover Carl’s ever done.”

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/08/28/carl-icahns-failed-raid-on-washington
 
Back
Top