big big polling trouble: keep on stabbing yourself Rs
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
cawacko
Well-known member
Better find two new party's then because that doesn't describe the Democrats or Republicans
Dear hyper partisan asshat, please learn to use the"reply with quote" function. But then you are an incredibly denseasshat, you don't have a brain large enough to comprehend this function.
This is your brain on stupid; don't do stupid.
evince
Truthmatters
note my friendly readers they to a man they refuse to accept or mention a word about the decades of court cases in which the republican party was caught cheating.
this is undeniable FACT and in our courts records.
they pretend it doesn't exist.
How can you get ANYTHING correct if you don't accept all the evidence berfore you?
You cant
that is why the republican party always fails
this is undeniable FACT and in our courts records.
they pretend it doesn't exist.
How can you get ANYTHING correct if you don't accept all the evidence berfore you?
You cant
that is why the republican party always fails
Wrong again asshat; the nonsense you post has nocredibility in the real world and most of your links are hyperbolic partisanbullshit.
You’re nothing but a vulgar hyper partisan asshat of epicproportions; no one can take your utter bullshit seriously and whenever youenter any thread here one needs to don their hip waders because of theincredible depths of bullshit that erupts from your incredibly ignorant tinymyopic brain. Honesty is not your forte' nor is telling the truth.
Althea
Althea told me...........
Nonsense. Romney/Rove couldn't believe they lost on election night, due in large part to their own bogus polling. Rove actually embarrassed himself on Fox News that night. It isn't just liberal new media.
Althea
Althea told me...........
I didn't think it was biased. I'm not a big fan of polls. It's just as easy to say 'the majority of the 1000 people we polled, don't like the teaparty'.
It's a tiny segment of the electorate. That said, I'm more concerned about the gerrymandered districts that have been crafted to achieve a desired goal. I think you'd need polling at 80% to overcome that issue.
Originally Posted by Taft2016 
Polling is merely an internal quality controldevice the liberal news media employs.
They skew the news and report in a manner to achieve a desired result.
Polling merely shows them how successful they've been, and frankly, since theyhave a stake in it ... the entire process is questionable at best.
Didn’t that just make Taft’s point?
Polling merely shows them how successful they've been, and frankly, since they have a stake in it ... the entire process is questionable at best.
Perhaps you are too dumb to comprehend that?
But Rove did make a serious faulty calculation in his assumptions; he forgot to assess the American sheeple and their incapacity for thinking logical and fact that they re-elected Obama because he was the first acceptable "black" President for no better reason.
Polling is merely an internal quality controldevice the liberal news media employs.
They skew the news and report in a manner to achieve a desired result.
Polling merely shows them how successful they've been, and frankly, since theyhave a stake in it ... the entire process is questionable at best.
Didn’t that just make Taft’s point?
Polling merely shows them how successful they've been, and frankly, since they have a stake in it ... the entire process is questionable at best.
Perhaps you are too dumb to comprehend that?
But Rove did make a serious faulty calculation in his assumptions; he forgot to assess the American sheeple and their incapacity for thinking logical and fact that they re-elected Obama because he was the first acceptable "black" President for no better reason.
Last edited:
cawacko
Well-known member
I'm not saying this invalidates their poll(s) but when the Huffington Post calls the PPP liberal-leaning it does give an idea as to where their allegiances lie.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/06/gop-house-2014-polls_n_4050686.html
evince
Truthmatters
evince
Truthmatters
what part of this poll do you claim is invalid?
what part would they game and what would they gain by faking the results?
cawacko
Well-known member
Where did I state any part of the poll is invalid Desh?
cawacko
Well-known member
Lol. Would you like me to get my friends to join JPP so they can validate what I said in 2009 to you?
evince
Truthmatters
then if you accept the findings why the fuck does it matter who did it?
cawacko
Well-known member
Me choosing not to respond to you throwing a tantrum and posting the same thing all over the board has nothing to do with what I accept or not. I appreciate your all knowing insight that i'm not an honest person though.
cawacko
Well-known member
I answered TK's question Desh. Why don't you relax for a minute and try to comprehend what was written instead of flying off the handle in attack mode rage.
tekkychick
New member
Yes, in this case Cawacko was answering my question and he even provided a link to back up his assertion, so it's cool, Desh.
He didn't slam me, he didn't insult me, he didn't call me dumb... Quite nice given what most of the conservatives on this board do! Which is why I didn't groan a post of his when Tom thought I should of; he was much more polite in how he stated his opinion.