Biden Says He Has Authority to Challenge Debt Limit

No need. That is not the discussion.

You made it part of the discussion when you claimed it is bullshit that the president's party seldom votes to override his veto. I asked for an example to prove your point and you now claim it is not part of the discussion. What you really mean is that you don't have any examples and need to change the topic.

Flash: "Members of a president's party seldom vote to override"

Into the Night: "
BULLSHIT!!!"
 
If you think congressional votes have no relationship to the party balance in each house you do not know enough to be in this discussion. Simply throwing out different types of fallacies is not a debate but irrelevant, repetitive rambling.

Non-sequitur fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Inversion fallacy. YOU are making them. They are YOUR fallacies.
 
You made it part of the discussion when you claimed it is bullshit that the president's party seldom votes to override his veto. I asked for an example to prove your point and you now claim it is not part of the discussion. What you really mean is that you don't have any examples and need to change the topic.
I never made it part of the discussion. Hallucination. I never claimed the President's party overrides his veto.
The only one bring up this crap is YOU.
 
Non-sequitur fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Inversion fallacy. YOU are making them. They are YOUR fallacies.

They are not fallacies. Naming imaginary fallacies is what you do when you have nothing substantive to add to the conversation because you realize you rejected valid points before you stopped to realize they are widely accepted facts easy to support.

Give evidence to support your point rather than just naming fallacies.
 
They are not fallacies.
They are fallacies. Denial of logic.
Naming imaginary fallacies
They are not imaginary. Denial of logic.
is what you do when you have nothing substantive to add to the conversation
You are not having a conversation. Void argument fallacy.
because you realize you rejected valid points
Your are not making any points. Void argument fallacy.
before you stopped to realize they are widely accepted facts easy to support.
You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy. Learn what 'fact' means. Redefinition fallacy.
Give evidence to support your point rather than just naming fallacies.
You are not making any points. Void argument fallacy.

Discard of logic. No argument presented.
 
Back
Top