Biden “impeachment” hearing!

Phantasmal said:
Have they even proven anything the family did was illegal? Their smoke is actually a fog machine. I’ve not seen any crimes associated with the family, except Hunter.
Click to expand...
Some of them are trying to tie the denial of funding to Ukraine until they clean out the corrupt politicians as proof of something.

Dates don't match. Facts don't add up.

But they still try to introduce 'evidence'.
 
TOP said:
... it's odd how people think they have everything under control for the longest time and then all of a sudden...
:blowup: someone's son forgets to pick up his laptop...
Click to expand...
Didn't that happen to you about 35 years ago, dear, and you never recovered?
 
QP! said:
Nope.

All they have is what Comer said which 'it sure looks bad'.

It is all smears based on the distaste humans have generally in seeing anyone gain financial benefit based on 'who they know'.

This distaste is eternal. People will always hate hearing that simply because someone gains a powerful office, then either Friends, Family or former business colleagues, can become formal or informal lobbyists, or Consultants or get Board Seats, and paid huge money, that they could never get the day before that person got put in to that Office.

especially if that friend, family member, or ex colleague was a troubled grifter who is now suddenly rich.
Click to expand...
Comer had some serious egg on his face when his Fox News comments were entered into the record.
 
Althea said:
Weak.
Click to expand...

I would be curious on TOP's view of the Trump crime family. We just had findings that DJT, Eric, DJr all committed fraud on a huge scale in NYS, and will now lose all their NYS assets. We had Ivanka and Jarad committing, yet uncharged, crimes in plain sight while in the Trump administration.

So since Tiffany Trump is part of the 'Family' would TOP say that is enough to confer guilt on to her too?
 
Althea said:
And joined the request to M.T. Geico that she doesn't enter porn into evidence.
Click to expand...

What about Lauren Boobert? $20 says she was going commando the night of the play. :thup:

80w6qy.jpg
 
TOP said:
They are guilty... both of them... I'm sure there's a thread on Trump somewhere to discuss what's happening with him if you like... I'll look for it and come back and post a link...
Click to expand...

...and yet the Republi'cans' themselves admit they did not even have evidence to convince members of the republican party to vote in favor of the Impeachment hearing. the republi'cans' themselves admit the HOPE for the impeachment inquiry is to finally find such evidence which they have not been able to find yet.

But you say there is enough to say, as a matter of fact, Joe is guilty.

You are a maga clown of the highest order. Completely dishonest. Completely unethical.
 
Althea said:
Perhaps, but there was no evidence of Biden wrongdoing.
Click to expand...
so you are going to stand behind him saying he never discussed business with Hunter and never interacted with any of Hunter's business dealings... no phone calls no texts no travel no photos no lunches no meetings not a thing completely unaware of everything that his son is doing even though he talks to him everyday and allowed him to reside in his home for quite a period of time... and everything that's being discussed in the inquiries are completely fabricated... and it's a complete coincidence that at this particular moment they found Tupac's killer...:laugh:
 
QP! said:
it's not me, buddy.

Go read Steve Bannons anger over it. He is saying perhaps the GOP would ask the 'key witnesses' first what there answers would be to select questions, rather than putting in 3 on day 1, who not wanting to lie under oath to Congress all admitted one by one they do not see any evidence yet that would warrant an impeachment or that connects things to Joe Biden'.
Click to expand...

so you believe Steve Bannon on this. On everything? shit stain........
 
TOP said:
so you are going to stand behind him saying he never discussed business with Hunter and never interacted with any of Hunter's business dealings... no phone calls no texts no travel no photos no lunches no meetings not a thing completely unaware of everything that his son is doing even though he talks to him everyday and allowed him to reside in his home for quite a period of time... and everything that's being discussed in the inquiries are completely fabricated... and it's a complete coincidence that at this particular moment they found Tupac's killer...:laugh:
Click to expand...

I talk to my mom, near every single day. She always brings up my work in the way parents do. "how is it going'. "are you doing ok'. She has NEVER participated in any of my work and there is zero reason to say Joe Biden did with Hunter.

The only real evidence we have on that is the first hand testimony of the Key Republi'can' witness who was in the room for Hunter on many of those calls as his business partner. And he testified under Oath Joe NEVER got in to any of Hunter s business details. NEVER.

That is real evidence you can present in a court of law.
 
zymurgy said:
so you believe Steve Bannon on this. On everything? shit stain........
Click to expand...

I don't have to believe him to report what he said.

Same with the leaders of the HOuse COmmittees Jim Jordan and Comer who have both stated to the press when pushed they have not got any evidence yet but 'we are working on it'.
 
QP! said:
I don't have to believe him to report what he said.

Same with the leaders of the HOuse COmmittees Jim Jordan and Comer who have both stated to the press when pushed they have not got any evidence yet but 'we are working on it'.
Click to expand...

that is how investigations work

we have enough evidence to demand Biden go under oath.
 
QP! said:
I talk to my mom, near every single day. She always brings up my work in the way parents do. "how is it going'. "are you doing ok'. She has NEVER participated in any of my work and there is zero reason to say Joe Biden did with Hunter.

The only real evidence we have on that is the first hand testimony of the Key Republi'can' witness who was in the room for Hunter on many of those calls as his business partner. And he testified under Oath Joe NEVER got in to any of Hunter s business details. NEVER.

That is real evidence you can present in a court of law.
Click to expand...

Except that Joe also discussed business with Hunter and was right there along for the ride... actually Hunter was along for the rides... we haven't seen hunter or Joe testify under oath... but I'm pretty sure we both know how that would turn out...
 
TOP said:
Except that Joe also discussed business with Hunter and was right there along for the ride... actually Hunter was along for the rides... we haven't seen hunter or Joe testify under oath... but I'm pretty sure we both know how that would turn out...
Click to expand...

Except that is yet another lie by you.

there has been no evidence that Joe discussed business with Hunter and was there for the ride.

The singular person the Republi'cans' put up as their expert witness and so excited for, testified under oath Joe and Hunter NEVER discussed business.

Testimony, under oath. by a first hand witness, is real evidence and could stand up to court scrutiny or be used for impeachment. The problem the Republi'cans' have who called him, is like the 3 expert witnesses they called yesterday, they got nothing from them. Worse then nothing as all 4 witnesses said the opposite. Joe was not involved or their was no evidence of it.
 
zymurgy said:
that is how investigations work

we have enough evidence to demand Biden go under oath.
Click to expand...

No in fact it is not.

Typically investigations start from the ground up, when some evidence or a credible report of some crime comes in that points to the person.

They are not typically launched in advance as a way to 'see if the person has done anything wrong or chargeable'.

By your method the DOJ and House and Senate committee could just put a bunch of peoples name on a spinning wheel and who ever name it stopped on gets an investigation and that is ok as they are just trying to see if they find anything to then take further action on. Which is exactly what they are doing with Joe. They are investigating to try and find evidence they do not have now, so then they can move to the next stage, IMpeachment or criminal referral, if they find it.

That is what you call weaponizing gov't to investigate your political enemies. It was what Trump promised with Hillary. And what the GOp House is doing now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top