Biden “impeachment” hearing!

[TOP]

Sadly for you you surmissal is neither evidence nor proof.

You cannot go into Court saying 'I have no evidence but i also have no doubt' and expect not to be laughed out of court, sanctioned and probably sued for being a derp.




You won't understand this as you are a derp, but it would not be illegal, in daily chit chat with a kid to say 'how are you doing' , 'how is your business doing". You are trying to pretend that even if work comes up then Biden broke a law.

That simply is not the case.

What Biden would have to do, is PARTICIPATE in Hunters business dealings in any number of ways and there is NO REASON to believe he did that simply because they talk every day.

I speak pretty near everyday with my mother, and she always asks me if business is ok and how i am doing. I do not give her any specifics and she does not care to here them. She just wants to know i am doing OK and all is good in my life.

A less disgusting person would assume that Joe, having lost one son young, and almost losing the other drugs, would also make those daily 'touch base' calls.

There is zero proof of what you assume and the one person that republi'cans' claimed was their devastating eye witness, who they brought in to testify said 3 things:

- Yes Joe Biden called Hunter every day
- Yes i was in the room many times when Hunter took those calls
- No Joe got into business or details on any of those calls

But here you are anyway slandering the man because you think it must have happened.

There's plenty of proof... he discussed the business with Hunter and he was involved... I guess you forget that Hunter traveled with him frequently on his business trips taking advantage of official transportation... .. lived with him as well.... and when he wasn't living with him used his address as his place of residence... there's no slandering of anyone... just stating facts...

 

[QP!]

^^^
Claims she never lies.

She and other republi'cans' prove over and over they are the worst kind of humans on this planet. They argue that guilt by 'Family' is a thing they believe in and support. And she is now arguing that assumptions equal guilt.

Person 1 - Oh did you hear the neighbors son just got arrested for fraud in another State?
Person 2 - No. And i know he speaks to our neighbor, his dad, every night on the phone so therefore his dad. or neighbour, must be guilty of the crime to. We should let the other neighbors know.

That there are people on this planet that think way, is truly deplorable. HIllary really got that point correct.

 

[TOP]

https://www.gawker.com/stop-using-the-word-derp-511316347

 

[QP!]

There's plenty of proof... he discussed the business with Hunter and he was involved... I guess you forget that Hunter traveled with him frequently on his business trips taking advantage of official transportation... .. lived with him as well.... and when he wasn't living with him used his address as his place of residence... there's no slandering of anyone... just stating facts...

Not one thing you list above is evidence that JOE participated in any thing illegal.

That is literally the stuff of witch hunt convictions of days gone by. Tons of allusion to it looks bad.

- Oh they were in the same room talking... so they must of been conspiring
- oh they were seen at lunch together... they must have been discussing the crime
- oh we have proof he was calling him ... they must have been plotting


What you do not have is ANY EVIDENCE Joe , in any way involved one iota in any of Hunters business dealings or did any crime.

What you have is to say 'oh when Hunter got divorced he used his Dad's home as his primary mailings address as he took time to get re=established' thus Joe is guilty of any crime his son did.

 

[QP!]

https://www.gawker.com/stop-using-the-word-derp-511316347

Derp is a very appropriate word to use as it is not simply a replacement for Stupid.

There are stupid arguments that can come from intelligent people and fool people into thinking they have merit. Ted Cruise might make those, for example.

And then there are stupid arguments, that are so painfully dumb, that everyone who is not a derp cannot understand why the person would think that makes sense to say or even think. Boebert and Marjorie Greene make those.


You fall in to the latter group. Painfully stupid arguments that are also so very dumb. To suggest you have proof your neighbours dad committed a crime because his son was just found guilty of fraud, and they speak every night on the phone, thus the dad must have discussed business with him and been also guilty.


that type of reasoning you would push to your neighbours as an example of your deduction and you saying it as if fact, is exactly whey Derp, belongs. You are a level below just stupid.

 

[domer76]

There's plenty of proof... he discussed the business with Hunter and he was involved... I guess you forget that Hunter traveled with him frequently on his business trips taking advantage of official transportation... .. lived with him as well.... and when he wasn't living with him used his address as his place of residence... there's no slandering of anyone... just stating facts...

“Where’s the beef?”

 

[domer76]

https://www.gawker.com/stop-using-the-word-derp-511316347

If you don’t wish to have people use to word “derp” to describe your stupidity, there’s an easy fix.

Stop placing your stupidity on public display.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

The large majority of Republicans on the committee, did not even show up.

What a hysterically funny farce this is. Straight out of your typical Reichwing media playbook. "It's being said that...." "We heard that...." Even their own witnesses said there's no evidence. It's nothing more than some (very green and foul-smelling) meat for their chumps. Look at them eat it right up! THIS IS IT!

 

[TOP]

Not one thing you list above is evidence that JOE participated in any thing illegal.

That is literally the stuff of witch hunt convictions of days gone by. Tons of illusion to it looks bad.

- Oh they were in the same room talking... so they must of been conspiring
- oh they were seen at lunch together... they must have been discussing the crime
- oh we have proof he was calling him ... they must have been plotting


What you do not have is ANY EVIDENCE Joe , in any way involved one iota in any of Hunters business dealings or did any crime.

What you have is to say 'oh when Hunter got divorced he used his Dad's home as his primary mailings address as he took time to get re=established' thus Joe is guilty of any crime his son did.

But he did participate.....
Perhaps had he been honest and not claimed dozens of times that he never discussed business with Hunter he may have been given a pass... but he just wouldn't be honest... it's going to be really tough on him when Hunter tells the truth... or under oath... Joe has to... I find it fascinating that you believe Republicans are just creating all this evidence out of thin air...soooooo much evidence...

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

^^^
Claims she never lies.

Anyone who has to declare that they don't lie, they don't do personal attacks, they don't use swears, and they're better than everyone else is obviously desperate to convince both us and themselves of these myths.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

It's even worse than that, as he claimed to be a Real estate lawyer (a slumlord lawyer) and even on matters of Real Estate law in other chats, he clearly does not understand anything about the law and is getting out matched.

NOw i say this without hyperbole, and that is that slumlord lawyers is often an area where lawyers who could not cut it in any other area, due to being so dumb, end up. The reason being as 99% of their work only requires their signature as a lawyer.

it is simple legal filings to sue or evict a person who never shows up in court. All the legal filings are created by competent Legal Clerks who often know the law much better than the slumlord lawyer, but who cannot sign the filings submitted to court as a lawyer signature is required.

Every law school has students who graduate at the bottom of their class. Just sayin'.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

EXACTLYT.

And so are Joe's two brothers and one sister.

Oh, so to are cousins and aunts and uncles of any of them.

Just like in China, round up and label the entire FAMILY guilty of the crimes of others even if you have ZERO proof of any crime done by the individual (Joe Biden).

he is 'FAMILY' after all and thus GUILTY.

I wonder if Toxic TOP believes that the late decorated veteran Beau Biden is also guilty? If someone in her family got a DUI does that mean that she's guilty too? Are all the Trumps guilty because daddy is guilty of housing discrimination, fraud (more than once), defamation?

 

[Cypress]

MAGA is incapable of being ashamed of their clownery and incompetence

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

There is a list of those who benefited.
And their accounts.. they just need to ask Hunter who benfits from the unidentified account in addition to the accounts there so much more proof.... and more being revealed each day... but even if Joe didn't refinancial benefits he was absolutely aware of what was going on and involved... if he was lovingly corresponding with Hunter everyday there's no way that was in the dark... unless he's so impaired that he can't remember...

What does that even mean? Why are you so desperate to hang the sins of the son on the father? Remember the topic here -- MENENDEZ and how the (D)s want him to go away. Why are you Reichtards so desperate to distract from that?

 

[Walt]

the money sitting in Biden family accounts......the money shuffling between the LLCs.

Can you imagine how bad you would look right now if there was a lot more money from a lot worse sources shuffling between trump's LLC's? Can you imagine how bad you would look if everyone in trump's family is involved in the "enterprise"?

 

[NiftyNiblick]

What does that even mean? Why are you so desperate to hang the sins of the son on the father? Remember the topic here -- MENENDEZ and how the (D)s want him to go away. Why are you Reichtards so desperate to distract from that?

TOP could be using me as an example of not wanting Menendez to go away.
I'm for defending our pricks the way the pachys defend their pricks.

Unfortunately, however, I don't represent the majority Democratic view.
Not enough Sicilian Democrats, obviously.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Not one thing you list above is evidence that JOE participated in any thing illegal.

That is literally the stuff of witch hunt convictions of days gone by. Tons of allusion to it looks bad.

- Oh they were in the same room talking... so they must of been conspiring
- oh they were seen at lunch together... they must have been discussing the crime
- oh we have proof he was calling him ... they must have been plotting


What you do not have is ANY EVIDENCE Joe , in any way involved one iota in any of Hunters business dealings or did any crime.

What you have is to say 'oh when Hunter got divorced he used his Dad's home as his primary mailings address as he took time to get re=established' thus Joe is guilty of any crime his son did.

Well said. Many newly-divorced people have to temporarily move back in with their parents due to financial reasons. Does that make the parents guilty if the offspring gets a DUI, gets caught embezzling at their job, gets a speeding ticket (esp. if they talk about it!), shoplifts, writes a bad check, etc.? In ReichtardWorld, it apparently does.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

If you don’t wish to have people use to word “derp” to describe your stupidity, there’s an easy fix.

Stop placing your stupidity on public display.

It's a sickness, a compulsion, an overwhelming desire for attention no matter how negative. It's also an excellent example of "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, then to speak and remove all doubt."

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

TOP could be using me as an example of not wanting Menendez to go away.
I'm for defending our pricks the way the pachys defend their pricks.

Unfortunately, however, I don't represent the majority Democratic view.
Not enough Sicilian Democrats, obviously.

I'm good with that. We don't want and don't need corrupt representatives in the party. Unlike the Reichwingers, we have plenty of other people with actual integrity.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

Well said. Many newly-divorced people have to temporarily move back in with their parents due to financial reasons.

When my daughter got divorced, I asked if I could move in with her.

She declined my request because her cat doesn't like the Avatar.
[At least, that's the excuse that she gave.]
Thus the Avatar and I are still struggling under the same roof with the Gestapo.

I can't seem to ever catch a break.