Biden crucified for being mainstream as NYT hilariously blames GOP for polarization

Howard the Fuck, listen up. Lincoln and the GOP got 39% of the vote, not one in the South.

Then Lincoln and the GOP started the CW.

Only Trump and the GOP have been as divisive as them since then.
 
No Americans aren't fixated on income inequality, but they feel it and are aware of it, and recognize some of the Democrats proposals are addressed at those disparities

The Horatio Alger myth is just that, an illusion, sounds good, but unreal, and although the economy is doing well, Americans recognize it as happening in spite of Trump not because of Trump

And lastly, you got to get over this fear of the word "socialism," America has been part socialist since the 19th Century, and it hasn't held up back yet
you show an inability to understand the wage growth and good jobs growth is a direct result of Trump's economics.
By "economics" i mean the de-regulation that was strangling growth as well as the tax cuts.

I can't believe you consider upward mobility a "myth". get a good job or a trade or a useful education,
or become an entrepreneur and anyone can get well off or even rich.

That's the problem with socialism..it does not reward risk capital, or even investing because if you do make it big -
Big Government takes it from you in confiscatory taxes. It's downright anti-American values
 
Howard the Fuck, listen up. Lincoln and the GOP got 39% of the vote, not one in the South.

Then Lincoln and the GOP started the CW.

Only Trump and the GOP have been as divisive as them since then.

Pretty sure the South,stealing states,attacking Ft Sumter started the War of Southern Treason!
 
Question: If the NY Times isn't just blatantly lying (as usual) about anyone other than Democrats being what's polarizing our country, then why is the one sane, moderate Democrat on the debate stage getting burned at the stake for every sane, moderate word, vote, or action that he ever made?

thumbnail

Trump is a Democrat?
 
Biden wasn't the only moderate there, but he is the leading candidate,

He isn't EVEN a moderate if we're being honest here. Moderates don't raise their hand when asked who all supports violating their oaths, shredding the Constitution, and betraying the people they're supposed to be representing to give free taxpayer-funded health care to those who illegally broke into their country. Treasonous lunatics are the only people who do that...Biden is just the least psychotic extremist in the race.

if Sanders were the guy out in front they would be attacking him from the middle, it is called Politics 101.

Which would be impossible since they are all on the record taking the same policy positions as Sanders (duh, speaking of politics 101). They would just be splitting hairs over the tiniest discrepancies in their various proposals for bankrupting the country and shredding the Constitution.

And they don't teach Logic in high school

Apparently not in yours. :laugh:

Yeah the GOP stays the same, lets see, fiscal conservative, gone,

You're right. Republicans have become too liberal. Glad you could admit the problem. And becoming less fiscally disciplined and principled is nothing like going from thinking abortion should be allowed under certain circumstances...to supporting limitless taxpayer-funded infanticide. Democrats have moved a thousand miles to the left, and try to change the subject by pointing out that Republicans have moved a hundred miles to the left.

:bs:

family values, gone,

You don't get to terrorize and persecute people into compliance on special treatment for homosexuals and then condemn your victims for no longer fighting back. And that's Republicans becoming more LIBERAL, dumb-ass.

:rofl2:

open trade, gone,

"Open trade" meaning, America being taken advantage of and robbed blind. And again, you're condemning conservatives for becoming too LIBERAL and using tax hikes as a policy weapon (tariffs), while claiming they are moving to the right.

:palm:

judicial restraint, gone,

The champions of Constitution-shredding judicial activism are accusing ANYONE ELSE of restraint issues? Um, no. That's your most ridiculous lie yet.

weaker Gov't, gone

Only because of liberals, yes. :stup2:

since January 2017 the GOP has done a complete 180 on the major principles they swore they professed for decades, go away with your "the GOP stays the same"

The few things you listed that weren't hilariously absurd lies are all moves TO THE LEFT. Think about it, crayon-eater...the claim is that Republicans are becoming right-wing and that this is what's dividing the country. And you are citing examples of them becoming more liberal.

What a fucking idiot. :laugh:

thumbnail


Ah, Trump has labeled Democrats as "traitors," "evil," and "enemies,"

Translation: Trump correctly described election-stealing frauds, demagogues, witch-hunters and their illegal coup attempts.

and Democrats make up just over thirty percent of voting Americans, words have meaning

30 percent of the population shouldn't openly root for burning our flag, banning our Pledge, kneeling during our Anthem, aiding all our enemies, and betraying all our allies if they don't want to be correctly included in the obvious description of the lunatic left as Constitution-shredding traitors.

:dunno:

And again, liberals accuse Trump and everyone who supports him of treason and being Hitler on a daily basis (in addition to the epidemic of Democrat political violence). What possible position could you ever possibly think you are in to accuse anyone else of being uncivilized?!? Your real problem is that you can act like a vile, vicious scumbag to others, but absolutely cannot handle it when anyone hits back. Bullies are always cowards and weaklings underneath.

And what you think is "evidence" is the exact talk radio rhetoric you need to get away from

Invalid off-topic ad hominem attacks refute nothing. Learn how to debate and try again. ;)
 
Last edited:
Not to worry, podjos: Arminius will be attacking Biden even more viciously than the progs now, even though he calls him sane and moderate.

It's Kamala's attacks you need to be worried about, not "podjo"(?) or Arminius. Biden dropped 10 pts. after Harris back stabbed Joe Thursday. Poor Biden ... being against busing was one of the few things Joe's ever been right about. Billion$ wasted transporting students instead of reassigning teachers, not to mention the students extended school day that didn't increase their classroom hours. It's really ironic because Kamala went to HS in Canada, and then attended Howard University, an HBCU that ranks among the worst universities in terms of racial diversity. So as an adult Kamala chose a segregated school for herself, but crucified Joe for understanding that busing was a money pit, and puting qualified educators in black schools was the better alternative. Biden, coward that he is, won't go after Kamala, or defend his position.
 
Originally Posted by Arminius No. Go eat your crayons and let the adults finish their conversation.



So triggered!

If all else fails, just cover your ears, close your eyes, and keep screaming, "Huh uh, you're the one who's triggered!" at everyone laughing at you.

:laugh:

thumbnail


That'll show 'em. :rofl2:
 
I will vote for any Democratic candidate that gets the nomination just as I did at the last election but I pray it is not Biden.

This election has an excellent chance of exposing the weakness of identity politics and its absurd spawn—Intersectionality.

For example, what do Hispanics [the rational ones] care about gayness or whether a president is gay or not? Or blacks, for that matter? Mayor Pete is in trouble with blacks already. How many gay people are there anyway? What are they, like 5% of the population or whatever? Same can be said for all the minorities: to whatever extent they care about their respective race/gender/ethnicity—they care first and foremost about their own *tribe*.

There’s absolutely no guarantee they will crossover and turnout for a candidate of a different tribe, just because the candidate is non-white, gay or what have you.

And if IP fails, miserably, it will do our politics and country a great service.
 
This election has an excellent chance of exposing the weakness of identity politics and its absurd spawn—Intersectionality.

For example, what do Hispanics [the rational ones] care about gayness or whether a president is gay or not? Or blacks, for that matter? Mayor Pete is in trouble with blacks already. How many gay people are there anyway? What are they, like 5% of the population or whatever? Same can be said for all the minorities: to whatever extent they care about their respective race/gender/ethnicity—they care first and foremost about their own *tribe*.

There’s absolutely no guarantee they will crossover and turnout for a candidate of a different tribe, just because the candidate is non-white, gay or what have you.

And if IP fails, miserably, it will do our politics and country a great service.

Plus, Latinos trend heavily toward anti-abortion and other religious views. So the left's 24/7 attempts to import a new electorate to work around the will of the American people will ultimately backfire in some ways...and wait till they realize Islam isn't a "religion of peace"...especially toward abortion, homosexuals, etc.

View attachment 10428
 
Howard the Fuck, listen up. Lincoln and the GOP got 39% of the vote, not one in the South.

Then Lincoln and the GOP started the CW.

Only Trump and the GOP have been as divisive as them since then.

The Dems started the war by attacking America. Those Dems still in the US tried hard to undermine our cause, such as Ohio Gov Vallandigham.
 
Back
Top