Biden: Classified documents at Mar-a-Lago raise concerns

Yakuda said:
You're a lying pussy. That's most likely your fathers fault but bit sure as shit isn't mine. You made a claim and can't back it up. That makes you a lying pussy.
Click to expand...

Keep trying, chickenshit. The fact remains you like to talk big but when I ask you to put skin in the game, you won't do it...but JPP members are suppose to believe you're tough enough to go shoot liberals for 'Murica! :rofl2:

6tye8l.gif


You're also proving you're a sock. LOL
 
Yakuda said:
No that shows how stupid you are. The issue is you have no grounds to claim trump committed a crime when the talking put in a pant suit got away with the same thing. If you have the evidence bring it forward, charge him and get the conviction but that will never happen.
Click to expand...

Having stuff on your server WHILE IN OFFICE is the same as possessing highly classified documents WHILE NOT IN OFFICE?

Tell us how they are the same.
 
domer76 said:
Having stuff on your server WHILE IN OFFICE is the same as possessing highly classified documents WHILE NOT IN OFFICE?

Tell us how they are the same.
Click to expand...

It's not, but it's still a security violation. Hillary should have at least been censured for her actions....but that would have fucked up the DNC nominee. LOL

Don't expect Yak the Sock to understand the difference. He's just another loudmouthed geezer talking tough on the Internet. He won't even bet me because he's afraid to lose.
 
domer76 said:
Having stuff on your server WHILE IN OFFICE is the same as possessing highly classified documents WHILE NOT IN OFFICE?

Tell us how they are the same.
Click to expand...

Are you people inherently stupid or did you learn it at the indoctrination centers? Look in office or not having an unprotected server at her home is a fucking crime. Understand? I doubt it. Even Comey tacitly admitted there was a crime but noted the talking pin in a pant suit had no "intent" to commit a crime so no other action would be taken. WTF don't you imbeciles get?
 
Yakuda said:
Are you people inherently stupid or did you learn it at the indoctrination centers? Look in office or not having an unprotected server at her home is a fucking crime. Understand? I doubt it. Even Comey tacitly admitted there was a crime but noted the talking pin in a pant suit had no "intent" to commit a crime so no other action would be taken. WTF don't you imbeciles get?
Click to expand...

You are so dumb its silly.
 
Jarod said:
You are so dumb its silly.
Click to expand...

So as I suspected you don't understand the difference. The stupid sow had a server in her home with an unknown level of protection and when she finally turned it over it was wiped clean. It's nearly impossible to over estimate how fucking stupid you biden/Clinton/obama ass lickers are.
 
Yakuda said:
So as I suspected you don't understand the difference. The stupid sow had a server in her home with an unknown level of protection and when she finally turned it over it was wiped clean. It's nearly impossible to over estimate how fucking stupid you biden/Clinton/obama ass lickers are.
Click to expand...
I understand the difference I understand the difference, Clinton in advertently did some stupid stuff. When asked to turn it over, she did. Trump intentionally store government documents, when asked to turn them over, he refused.

That has very little to do with why I call you dumb, you believe all kinds of stupid conspiracy theories with no basis or evidence. You believe Donald Trump won the election. Anyone who still believes that is delusional or idiotic.
 
Yakuda said:
Are you people inherently stupid or did you learn it at the indoctrination centers? Look in office or not having an unprotected server at her home is a fucking crime. Understand? I doubt it. Even Comey tacitly admitted there was a crime but noted the talking pin in a pant suit had no "intent" to commit a crime so no other action would be taken. WTF don't you imbeciles get?
Click to expand...

Tell us once again, pally boy.

The current Secretary of State having an unsecured server is the same as a private citizen possessing highly classified material in an unsecured site?

And you call us imbeciles? How ironic!
 
Dutch Uncle said:
It's not, but it's still a security violation. Hillary should have at least been censured for her actions....but that would have fucked up the DNC nominee. LOL

Don't expect Yak the Sock to understand the difference. He's just another loudmouthed geezer talking tough on the Internet. He won't even bet me because he's afraid to lose.
Click to expand...

Sure it was a security violation. But to claim the two instances are the same is ludicrous.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top