Biden administration tried to hide Chinese spy balloon from American public

President Biden and his administration knew for nearly a week that a Chinese spy balloon was hovering in U.S. airspace — but kept the incursion secret, fearing it would derail Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s planned meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing.

Republicans expressed “outrage” over the president’s refusal to act.

“Communist China’s surveillance balloon violates international law and threatens our homeland,” Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-Staten Island) told The Post.

“It’s an outrage that the Biden Administration spotted this balloon days ago as it was flying over the Aleutian Islands and did nothing about it,” she said. “The president has not even made a comment about this unacceptable act of aggression by the CCP.”

Team Biden became aware of the balloon on Jan. 28, when it was spotted over Alaska, according to reports.

The politics of the looming 2024 presidential election also played a role in Biden’s actions, sources told Bloomberg, with the fraught US-China relationship expected to be a central foreign policy issue.

Team Biden became aware of the balloon on Jan. 28, Bloomberg reported, when it was spotted over Alaska.

The US military tracked it as it flew into Canadian airspace, then re-entered American skies on Tuesday. The next day, Biden received a detailed briefing on the balloon and its course, attended by Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley.

Sources told Bloomberg that Milley and Austin argued against shooting the craft down due to the danger its debris could pose to the public. Biden initially wanted it destroyed, but acquiesced, according to the report.

But the president also chose to conceal the crisis from the American public. Instead, his administration sought an explanation from the Chinese embassy in Washington — while making the finishing touches on plans for Blinken’s diplomatic visit to China on Sunday.

The administration finally came clean to the public Thursday, after the Billings Gazette, a local Montana paper, published photos of the floating orb and the story jumped into the national media.

“Not gonna lie,” tweeted witness Chase Doak, whose video of the high-flying spying platform went viral. “First, I thought this was a #ufo. Then, I thought it was @elonmusk in a Wizard of Oz cosplay scenario. But it was just a run-of-the-mill Chinese spy balloon!”

The uproar forced Blinken to postpone his trip indefinitely, while China repeatedly insisted that the “airship” was meant for meteorological research and had been innocently blown off course.

Former president Donald Trump, ex-veep Mike Pence, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and former Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley have all demanded that the balloon be shot down, accusing Biden of weakness against Beijing.

https://nypost.com/2023/02/04/biden...ide-chinese-spy-balloon-from-american-public/

What did the administration try to hide?
 
Sorry but, the new York Post is a questionable publication.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-post/

Funded by / Ownership

The New York Post is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, which owns many conservative/sensational media outlets worldwide. The paper is funded through advertising, subscriptions, and newsstand sales.

Analysis / Bias

In review, the New York Post tends to publish stories utilizing sensationalized headlines with emotionally loaded wording such as “Cop cold-cocks unarmed man ‘acting irate’ at restaurant,” and “It’s time for Bill Clinton to take a walk in the Chappaqua woods.” The New York Post also republishes news from other sources, such as the least-biased Associated Press. More stories favor the right, but the NY Post does not shy away from reporting negative coverage of the right if it is a big story. They also tend to source their information properly; however, many times, the headline misleadingly exaggerates the actual story they are reporting.

Editorially, The Post has endorsed the Republican Presidential Candidate in every race since 1980. However, in 2016 they did not offer either candidate an endorsement for the Presidential election.

According to an LA Times article, the New York Post is reported to be former U.S. President Donald Trump’s preferred newspaper, which maintains frequent contact with Rupert Murdoch. The Post, According to a survey conducted by Pace University in 2004, was rated the least credible major news outlet in New York. The Post has been criticized since the beginning of Murdoch’s ownership for “sensationalism, blatant advocacy, and conservative bias.”

Overall we rate the New York Post on the far end of Right-Center Biased due to story selection that typically favors the Right and Mixed (borderline questionable) for factual reporting based on several failed fact checks.
 
Last edited:
SORRY,....that info came from an unreliable source! :cool:

Forbes is an unreliable source?

Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

Politically, Forbes presents a reasonable balance through their contributors; however, when looking at articles pertaining to Trump, there are more in favor of his policies than against.

tenor.gif

iu
 
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-post/

Funded by / Ownership

The New York Post is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, which owns many conservative/sensational media outlets worldwide. The paper is funded through advertising, subscriptions, and newsstand sales.

Analysis / Bias

In review, the New York Post tends to publish stories utilizing sensationalized headlines with emotionally loaded wording such as “Cop cold-cocks unarmed man ‘acting irate’ at restaurant,” and “It’s time for Bill Clinton to take a walk in the Chappaqua woods.” The New York Post also republishes news from other sources, such as the least-biased Associated Press. More stories favor the right, but the NY Post does not shy away from reporting negative coverage of the right if it is a big story. They also tend to source their information properly; however, many times, the headline misleadingly exaggerates the actual story they are reporting.

Editorially, The Post has endorsed the Republican Presidential Candidate in every race since 1980. However, in 2016 they did not offer either candidate an endorsement for the Presidential election.

According to an LA Times article, the New York Post is reported to be former U.S. President Donald Trump’s preferred newspaper, which maintains frequent contact with Rupert Murdoch. The Post, According to a survey conducted by Pace University in 2004, was rated the least credible major news outlet in New York. The Post has been criticized since the beginning of Murdoch’s ownership for “sensationalism, blatant advocacy, and conservative bias.”

Overall we rate the New York Post on the far end of Right-Center Biased due to story selection that typically favors the Right and Mixed (borderline questionable) for factual reporting based on several failed fact checks.

Irrelevant appeal to authority (and not much of one to begin with). Why not refute the material rather than attack the source? Or, is it that you can't refute the material and that's why you are attacking the source?
 

The Gateway Pundit? Are you serious? You might as well have posted something from the National Enquirer. BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!

Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.

Detailed Report


Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY


tenor.gif
 
it looks like you are finally starting to make a bit of sense......

If you haven't noticed, the Leftists here, like Joke Communist et al., have nothing to argue back with except insults and ad hominem. They're attacking the sources without any attempt to rebut anything said. They have nothing to defend their senile cretin of a leader with.
 
The Gateway Pundit? Are you serious? You might as well have posted something from the National Enquirer. BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!

Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.

Detailed Report


Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY


tenor.gif

Are you? You have posted NOTHING but ad hominem so far. Attacking the source instead of refuting the argument presented is a meaningless gesture.
 
Are you? You have posted NOTHING but ad hominem so far. Attacking the source instead of refuting the argument presented is a meaningless gesture.

Bullshit. Attacking the source is very relevant. You just don't like it because it destroys your argument and makes you all butt-hurt.

1i6ccq.jpg
 
3 ballons crossed when Trump was in office, Did you hear about them? Trump set a precedence that Biden decided to step away from. Donnie told us nothing. Biden allowed us to track it like kids tracking Santa. It is here now here and moving there. Rightys decided that we should have shot it down earlier. Trump did not allow that to fester. Rightys are going to bitch. let them. Biden treated us like adults providing ongoing information.
 
President Biden and his administration knew for nearly a week that a Chinese spy balloon was hovering in U.S. airspace — but kept the incursion secret, fearing it would derail Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s planned meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing.


https://nypost.com/2023/02/04/biden...ide-chinese-spy-balloon-from-american-public/
No biggie, ziggy. It didn't bother Trump so why should it bother Biden? Besides, I think the Chinese are playing the US for suckers with this entire little drama. https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/china-regional-snapshot-south-america/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattno...s-when-president-trump-was-in-office-too/amp/

Experts have said they took place

Maybe the Chinese got used to nothing being done about it under trump


They thought they could just away with it



And all of this still leaves open the possibility that other adversary aircraft have flown over the U.S. during the Trump years, aside from balloons. We still don’t know why swarms of drones were flying over Colorado and Nebraska in December 2019 and January 2020. If you’ll recall, President Trump was president at that time and we never got an answer to who was behind that.
 
Back
Top