bho's birth certificate revisited

Don Quixote

Don Quixote

cancer survivor
Contributor
what is sad and a bit scary is that there are still people that feel that bho is not legitimately president and some how stole the election

they are angry and want their nation back

they are going on about this rather than focusing on the next election
 
i think the issue is silly and should be put to rest....however, fault lies all around. obama for not being as transparent as mccain in this situation and all the liberal sites and posters out there claiming false information about the birth certificate...which naturally leads people to think there is a cover up....

for example: it is absolutely false that factcheck.org looked, touched and photographed the "original"....and many libs parrot this hook line and sinker....all this does it feed the conspiracy....

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/22/martin.obama.birth/index.html

that was posted 3 hours ago
 
yeah a diversion..."the Hugo" has spent over a million dollars to not have to produce (the original) birth certificate...

that's a real diversion alright
 
uscitizen said:
DQ why start a thread like this? It is typically a thread diversion topic.
Click to expand...

uh....now it is the topic :pke:

do you believe factcheck.org touched, saw and photographed the original....to this day even a cnn commentator is citing factcheck.org as "evidence" that obama has produced the original when in fact he has not
 
uscitizen said:
Did Bush produce his origional?
Click to expand...

^lol^ back to bush

the question you should ask is did mccain produce his since his was questioned same as obama....did gore provide his...dude, stay focused

now, care to answer the question i posed or are you going to run away like you did in the backfire thread?
 
so far, in this thread the only denial is from libs ignoring that factcheck.org made a false claim that is parrotted by liberals everywhere, including a ib1 and cnn commentor this morning

i notice again that USC runs away from tough questioning and facts...must be smarting from the backfire thread
 
DonQuixote said:
what is sad and a bit scary is that there are still people that feel that bho is not legitimately president and some how stole the election

they are angry and want their nation back

they are going on about this rather than focusing on the next election
Click to expand...


these are the same people who thought Hillary Clinton murdered Vince Foster.
 
Yurt said:
so far, in this thread the only denial is from libs ignoring that factcheck.org made a false claim that is parrotted by liberals everywhere, including a ib1 and cnn commentor this morning

i notice again that USC runs away from tough questioning and facts...must be smarting from the backfire thread
Click to expand...

What? You self skewered yourself good on the backfire thread.

But thanks for dredging up the dixie is a Christian post.

as promised points are coming for that tonight wen my points bucket gets refilled.
 
uscitizen said:
What? You self skewered yourself good on the backfire thread.

But thanks for dredging up the dixie is a Christian post.

as promised points are coming for that tonight wen my points bucket gets refilled.
Click to expand...

you obviously ""missed"" the posts made after 8 last night where i presented facts and statements from the report that show my points were accurate, but i don't expect you to address facts and it is clear once again this very thread you are running away from the issue of factcheck.org....you haven't addressed a single fact in this thread and you ran away from asking if bush showed his because you know full well mccain showed his and so since you lost that piont, you ignore it....

and once again, you're wrong about people bringing stuff up...i never dredged up any post...onceler did, since you do this repeatedly....you're either very stupid or a liar

you pick
 
You presented facts about the liberals which did not diminish the cons backfire effect which you demonstrated so aptly.
:clink:

You only disproved part of IB1's posts not mine.
 
uscitizen said:
You presented facts about the liberals which did not diminish the cons backfire effect which you demonstrated so aptly.
:clink:

You only disproved part of IB1's posts not mine.
Click to expand...

go into that thread and actually discuss why after reading my posts from last night....summary conclusions that you're right and i'm wrong are weak

and why is it you never admit you're wrong or take back your bs claims that cons or i started something when that is wholly untrue?
 
uscitizen said:
You presented facts about the liberals which did not diminish the cons backfire effect which you demonstrated so aptly.
:clink:

You only disproved part of IB1's posts not mine.
Click to expand...

He didn't disprove any of my posts, retard. He showed what the study showed, which is liberals are skeptical about refuting information. What it didn't show was that liberals became more convinced they were right after being shown they were wrong, the way conservatives do.
 
ib1yysguy said:
He didn't disprove any of my posts, retard. He showed what the study showed, which is liberals are skeptical about refuting information. What it didn't show was that liberals became more convinced they were right after being shown they were wrong, the way conservatives do.
Click to expand...

why don't you go back into that thread and address my recent posts showing your error in relying on that report for anything more than the sample and see where i address the backfire effect on liberals

i find it humorous that you, MM, usc are staying away from that thread after i cogently present solid arguments gleaned from the report that refute your bs claims and instead you and usc are arguing the thread elsewhere instead of addressing your own report in that thread
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top