bho angry about mccrystal interview by rolling stone

Taichiliberal said:
No matter how you slice it, you're still full of Southern Man baloney! By your own statements, Geraldo is full of it until he spouts some wild conspiracy theory that appeases your anti-Obama attitude, THEN he's suddenly valid.

And spare me this bullshit that the Southern Man is "open minded"....YOU CAN'T EVEN READ AND DISCUSS THE INFORMATION/ARTICLES I LINKED. Instead, you latch onto a guy of whom you have such contempt that you refer to as "Jerry Rivers"...knowing full well the man decided NOT to "Anglo-ize" his first name DECADES ago.

As usual, the chronology of the post is the Southern Man's undoing.
Click to expand...

A conspiracy involves more than one person, dummy! The Rolling Stones reporter acted on his own, but his strategy reflects hard core liberal values.
 
Taichiliberal said:
What's the matter bunky....too much of a coward or too fucking stupid to read two links to information that doesn't support your bullshit?

The burden of proof is on YOU, you chuckling asshole. I challenged YOU and your fellow neocon parrots to show where your assertions stand in relation to the actual information. One article shows the interview, the other discusses it's relation to military code of conduct.

To date, NONE OF YOU DARE DEAL WITH THAT INFORMATION.

I told you before, you intellectually impotent clown, I don't do your homework anymore or indulge your childish dodges. The chronology of the posts proves me right on this, so you can continue to blow smoke.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=670976&postcount=36

Laugh, clown, laugh.
Click to expand...

What "assertions" are you fuckin' talking about?

Are you having flashbacks, or just hallucinations...???

I made NO assertions in this entire thread...I simply asked a question, for
discussion as you recommend, peckerhead....
a question you seem incapable of answering in spite of being asked numerous times........just a simple "I DON'T KNOW" is all you need to post....
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
No matter how you slice it, you're still full of Southern Man baloney! By your own statements, Geraldo is full of it until he spouts some wild conspiracy theory that appeases your anti-Obama attitude, THEN he's suddenly valid.

And spare me this bullshit that the Southern Man is "open minded"....YOU CAN'T EVEN READ AND DISCUSS THE INFORMATION/ARTICLES I LINKED. Instead, you latch onto a guy of whom you have such contempt that you refer to as "Jerry Rivers"...knowing full well the man decided NOT to "Anglo-ize" his first name DECADES ago.

As usual, the chronology of the post is the Southern Man's undoing.
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
A conspiracy involves more than one person, dummy! The Rolling Stones reporter acted on his own, but his strategy reflects hard core liberal values.
Click to expand...


:palm: The "conspiracy" that Geraldo is alleging would involve the reporter and his editor...and the subsequent MSM outlets that carried the story. You know, the "liberal media" you neocon nitwits are always railing about? So Geraldo tells you the BS you want to here, and suddenly you switch gears on your condemnation of him.

The Reporters "strategy" is called getting the interview, you ignorant lout! This means you get the subject into a relaxed setting to tell you stuff he wouldn't normally do. McChrystal's no idiot...you don't get to his status without becoming familar with dancing with the press. The reporter didn't misrepresent himself or ask "leading" questions. Hell, he was "imbedded" with them... McChrystal and his boys just let their guard down, and got screwed by them. No one said life was fair.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
What's the matter bunky....too much of a coward or too fucking stupid to read two links to information that doesn't support your bullshit?

The burden of proof is on YOU, you chuckling asshole. I challenged YOU and your fellow neocon parrots to show where your assertions stand in relation to the actual information. One article shows the interview, the other discusses it's relation to military code of conduct.

To date, NONE OF YOU DARE DEAL WITH THAT INFORMATION.

I told you before, you intellectually impotent clown, I don't do your homework anymore or indulge your childish dodges. The chronology of the posts proves me right on this, so you can continue to blow smoke.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...6&postcount=36

Laugh, clown, laugh.
Click to expand...

bravo said:
What "assertions" are you fuckin' talking about?

Are you having flashbacks, or just hallucinations...???

I made NO assertions in this entire thread...I simply asked a question, for
discussion as you recommend, peckerhead....
a question you seem incapable of answering in spite of being asked numerous times........just a simple "I DON'T KNOW" is all you need to post....
Click to expand...

:palm: I just love watching this stupe lose it, folks! Faced with facts that don't support his blatherings, he just deteriorates into a fool raging and repeating himself.

Pay attention, my little diwitted Bravo. The link is to the stupidity of Dixie's statement, to which I provided proof to the contrary. YOU, in your infinite foolishness, think that by asking me to do your reading for you will give you an opportunity to support Dixie's idiocy and disprove the information I provided.

Guess again, you intellectually impotent piece of false bravado.

Dixie made a statement, I provided FACTS to the contrary....neither he or YOU will read them because you can't say, "there's nothing there that proves you right, Taichiliberal". The second you have the cojones to make that statement, I'll have the basis to provide the information that demonstrates either you didn't read the source links or you're a liar or too fucking stupid to read comprehensively.

But do continue your dodgy BS....it just confirms how full of it you are. Next time THINK before you pick up the gauntlet for your equally moronic pals...makes you look less foolish. "Bravo" indeed.
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
:palm: The "conspiracy" that Geraldo is alleging would involve the reporter and his editor...and the subsequent MSM outlets that carried the story.
Click to expand...
:lol: Not! The editor and his employee are in a contractual relationship: the employee writes a story and the editor then decides to put it in the magazine. There's nothing illegal in that. And the media, not just the MSM, is just picking up on a published story, again no illegality.

You must be retarded if you don't know what "conspiracy" means.
 
Southern Man said:
:lol: Not! The editor and his employee are in a contractual relationship: the employee writes a story and the editor then decides to put it in the magazine. There's nothing illegal in that. And the media, not just the MSM, is just picking up on a published story, again no illegality.

You must be retarded if you don't know what "conspiracy" means.
Click to expand...

Ahhh, so then neither you or you moronic compadres can make the claim of a conspiracy of a "liberal media bias in reporting" ever again, by your own definition here. (at this point folks, Southy bends over and shoves his head up his own butt trying to untangle the contradiction he's just done. Either that or he'll just lie as usual).

Now back to reality.....Rivera is ASSERTING AN OPINION. This mean that his wild conspiracy theory of regarding Obama and the oil disaster is just that....A THEORY. Yet you, a man who admits not taking Rivera seriously, suddenly give credence to the ONE bullhorn piece that appeals to your anti-Obama mindset.....which goes to show how full of it you are.

All this just to AVOID the FACT that I proved Dixie wrong by providing FACTS that the Southern Man is too much of an intellectual coward to read.

Laugh, my Southern man clown, laugh
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
Ahhh, so then neither you or you moronic compadres can make the claim of a conspiracy of a "liberal media bias in reporting" ever again, by your own definition here.
Click to expand...
Dude I've never said the MSM was a conspiracy, and I defy you to prove otherwise.

Stop deflecting and admit you fucked up by calling it a conspiracy. :pke:
 
Southern Man said:
Dude I've never said the MSM was a conspiracy, and I defy you to prove otherwise.

You are so full of shit Southy, it almost defies description. You and ever other neocon numbskull on these and boards past have wailed and railed that the MSM is liberal biased, that it purposely ignores and skews news to favor political left views. Since there is more than one news broadcast/print business, to proclaim ALL of them are working in cahoots to skew the news speaks of conspiracy. Look up the definition. Then THINK IT THROUGH, YOU SOUTHY SIMP!

Stop deflecting and admit you fucked up by calling it a conspiracy. :pke:
Click to expand...

Once again, Southy's convoluted "logic" is his own undoing.
 
Originally Posted by DonQuixote
would it be worth the loss of life of our troops and who would profit from our losses and expenses
Click to expand...

Wickedjews said:
I am mostly a pacifist. And, yet, yes, practically anything would be worth preventing the nation from being handed over to the Taliban again.
Click to expand...

Ahhh, but is it the USA's position to be the moral policemen of the world? Remember, this country was doing business (i.e., the Caspian Sea pipeline) with the Taliban prior to 9/11.

Personally, I'm of the mindset that if you don't like how a country's gov't treats its people, then don't do business with them. But given the global economy, I know that is wishful thinking.

I would like the Taliban to be wiped off the face of the planet...but until the Afghani people are willing to kick them to the curb, then the Taliban may rise again.
 
This is a change in personnel, but it is not a change in policy.

All of us have personal interests. All of us have opinions.

Our politics often fuels conflict, but we have to renew our sense of purpose and meet our responsibilities to one another and to our troops who are in harm's way and to our country.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Ahhh, but is it the USA's position to be the moral policemen of the world? Remember, this country was doing business (i.e., the Caspian Sea pipeline) with the Taliban prior to 9/11.

Personally, I'm of the mindset that if you don't like how a country's gov't treats its people, then don't do business with them. But given the global economy, I know that is wishful thinking.

I would like the Taliban to be wiped off the face of the planet...but until the Afghani people are willing to kick them to the curb, then the Taliban may rise again.
Click to expand...

The Afghan people have no right to install an oppressive government. If they want to be oppressed they should oppress themselves.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Ahhh, but is it the USA's position to be the moral policemen of the world? Remember, this country was doing business (i.e., the Caspian Sea pipeline) with the Taliban prior to 9/11.

Personally, I'm of the mindset that if you don't like how a country's gov't treats its people, then don't do business with them. But given the global economy, I know that is wishful thinking.

I would like the Taliban to be wiped off the face of the planet...but until the Afghani people are willing to kick them to the curb, then the Taliban may rise again.
Click to expand...

Wickedjews said:
The Afghan people have no right to install an oppressive government. If they want to be oppressed they should oppress themselves.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, so if several foreign gov'ts decided that the USA had no right to install the Shrub's gov't (or Slick Willy, or BAM) and sent in troops to change the regime, that would be alright by you?

Sorry pal, but your "logic" like your screen name, just doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
 
Southern Man said:
How is that a conspiracy, Libby?
Click to expand...

Posts 63, 66 & 68.

If you don't understand by now, you're just stubborn or you're truly fucking stupid. I could care less either way.

Now, repeat yourself, toss an insult, claim a "victory" and have a nice maudlin squawk with the other willfully ignorant neocon parrots.

Adiso for now.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Posts 63, 66 & 68.

If you don't understand by now, you're just stubborn or you're truly fucking stupid. I could care less either way.

Now, repeat yourself, toss an insult, claim a "victory" and have a nice maudlin squawk with the other willfully ignorant neocon parrots.

Adiso for now.
Click to expand...
Those posts don't answer my question. Why not just admit that you fucked up and don't know what a conspiracy is?

Also, what does "Adiso" mean? Did you fuck that up too?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top