He won there last time too, didn't he?
How'd that work out for him?
He’s from right next door. One could have called this long ago. But he gets the same number of delegates as Pete. Not much of a win.
Bernie wins New Hampshire!
- Thread starter Cinnabar
- Start date
He’s from right next door. One could have called this long ago. But he gets the same number of delegates as Pete. Not much of a win.
They just don't want Blacks and Mexicans to have free healthcare.
They will pay the double to make sure that doesn't happen
Keep schooling them
Get them--------------------------------->here<-----------------------------
More in U.S. Say They Are Better Off Than in Past Elections
More in U.S. Say They Are Better Off Than in Past Elections
by Jeffrey M. Jones
More in U.S. Say They Are Better Off Than in Past Elections
Story Highlights
61% say they are better off than three years ago
No more than 50% have said this in past election cycles
Evaluations of U.S. world standing mostly similar to past elections
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Sixty-one percent of Americans say they are better off than they were three years ago, a higher percentage than in prior election years when an incumbent president was running. In the 1992, 1996 and 2004 election cycles, exactly half said they were better off. In three separate measures during the 2012 election cycle, an average of 45% said they were better off.
Americans' Assessments of Their Personal Situation Comparatively Better Than in Prior Presidential Incumbent Re-Election Years
Are you better off than you were three years ago, or not?
Yes, better off No, not better off As well off (vol.)
% % %
2020 61 36 3
2012 45 52 3
2004 50 42 8
1996 50 34 15
1992 50 38 11
(vol.) = volunteered response; Data for 1992, 1996 and 2020 based on poll conducted in January of the election year. Data for 2012 based on average of three polls conducted in October 2011, December 2011 and August 2012. Data for 2004 based on an October 2003 poll.
galluppoll.com
This is what wins elections.
More in U.S. Say They Are Better Off Than in Past Elections
by Jeffrey M. Jones
More in U.S. Say They Are Better Off Than in Past Elections
Story Highlights
61% say they are better off than three years ago
No more than 50% have said this in past election cycles
Evaluations of U.S. world standing mostly similar to past elections
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Sixty-one percent of Americans say they are better off than they were three years ago, a higher percentage than in prior election years when an incumbent president was running. In the 1992, 1996 and 2004 election cycles, exactly half said they were better off. In three separate measures during the 2012 election cycle, an average of 45% said they were better off.
Americans' Assessments of Their Personal Situation Comparatively Better Than in Prior Presidential Incumbent Re-Election Years
Are you better off than you were three years ago, or not?
Yes, better off No, not better off As well off (vol.)
% % %
2020 61 36 3
2012 45 52 3
2004 50 42 8
1996 50 34 15
1992 50 38 11
(vol.) = volunteered response; Data for 1992, 1996 and 2020 based on poll conducted in January of the election year. Data for 2012 based on average of three polls conducted in October 2011, December 2011 and August 2012. Data for 2004 based on an October 2003 poll.
galluppoll.com
This is what wins elections.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
he's being defeated horribly. sorry to tell ya.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
and.... race card.... you're so predictably retarded.
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
First of all, I don't think all Republicans are racists, or that they all view every issue through the lens of race.
Second of all, if anything is to get accomplished, it requires working with those you might not like or agree with on everything.
This used to be a matter of common sense back when common sense used to exist in society.
So according to you, we might as well not vote for anyone.
Because what you just said certainly doesn't make the case for Sanders.
Actually, it's a better reason to NOT elect old BS.
Bloomberg is a serious businessman (unlike Trump who is a fake, pretend one) who backs Democrat positions, but who Republicans can relate to.
He'd have a better chance of successfully dealing with them than any progressive socialist like ol' BS.
More in U.S. Say They Are Better Off Than in Past Elections
More in U.S. Say They Are Better Off Than in Past Elections
by Jeffrey M. Jones
More in U.S. Say They Are Better Off Than in Past Elections
Story Highlights
61% say they are better off than three years ago
No more than 50% have said this in past election cycles
Evaluations of U.S. world standing mostly similar to past elections
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Sixty-one percent of Americans say they are better off than they were three years ago, a higher percentage than in prior election years when an incumbent president was running. In the 1992, 1996 and 2004 election cycles, exactly half said they were better off. In three separate measures during the 2012 election cycle, an average of 45% said they were better off.
Americans' Assessments of Their Personal Situation Comparatively Better Than in Prior Presidential Incumbent Re-Election Years
Are you better off than you were three years ago, or not?
Yes, better off No, not better off As well off (vol.)
% % %
2020 61 36 3
2012 45 52 3
2004 50 42 8
1996 50 34 15
1992 50 38 11
(vol.) = volunteered response; Data for 1992, 1996 and 2020 based on poll conducted in January of the election year. Data for 2012 based on average of three polls conducted in October 2011, December 2011 and August 2012. Data for 2004 based on an October 2003 poll.
galluppoll.com
This is what wins elections.
More in U.S. Say They Are Better Off Than in Past Elections
by Jeffrey M. Jones
More in U.S. Say They Are Better Off Than in Past Elections
Story Highlights
61% say they are better off than three years ago
No more than 50% have said this in past election cycles
Evaluations of U.S. world standing mostly similar to past elections
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Sixty-one percent of Americans say they are better off than they were three years ago, a higher percentage than in prior election years when an incumbent president was running. In the 1992, 1996 and 2004 election cycles, exactly half said they were better off. In three separate measures during the 2012 election cycle, an average of 45% said they were better off.
Americans' Assessments of Their Personal Situation Comparatively Better Than in Prior Presidential Incumbent Re-Election Years
Are you better off than you were three years ago, or not?
Yes, better off No, not better off As well off (vol.)
% % %
2020 61 36 3
2012 45 52 3
2004 50 42 8
1996 50 34 15
1992 50 38 11
(vol.) = volunteered response; Data for 1992, 1996 and 2020 based on poll conducted in January of the election year. Data for 2012 based on average of three polls conducted in October 2011, December 2011 and August 2012. Data for 2004 based on an October 2003 poll.
galluppoll.com
This is what wins elections.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
lol. you're so confused. you think bloomberg can get the voters out?
you're mentally lacklustre.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
incredibly reality averse...
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
get bernie to go back to his anti globalist ways, and then support him. you will win. of course, you idjits innoculated yourselves against reason.
I'm glad you "enjoyed" it
Most Americans seem to be convinced 'their' health care system is the 'Best in the World'. Here was an international tour that showed what other countries had. France was the most extravagant. Their system pays for home care and nursing while you recuperate. Doing the Laundry and Cooking.
"The French health care system is generally recognised as offering one of the best, services of public health care in the world. Above all, it is a system that works, provides universal cover, and is a system that is strongly defended by virtually everyone in France.
The health care system in France is made up of a fully-integrated network of public hospitals, private hospitals, doctors and other medical service providers. It is a universal service providing health care for every citizen, irrespective of wealth, age or social status."
https://about-france.com/health-care.htm
"France / USA
People in France, who have lived with their national health service system for all or most of their lives, and know first hand how well it works, have been very perplexed by the passions aroused in the United States by Obamacare. They have even greated difficulty understanding how Americans could elect as Obama's successor Donald Trump, a man who pledged to abolish universal health care in the USA. Even the most conservative forces in French life support the national health service and have difficulty understanding why some people in the USA imagine that an obligatory health insurance scheme for all could be a bad thing."
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
basically you fucked the nation with globalist hillary poison in 2016.
and you're on course to do it again. donny deutche admitted he would vote for trump over warren or bernie, morning joe made him take it back.
and you're on course to do it again. donny deutche admitted he would vote for trump over warren or bernie, morning joe made him take it back.
Hard to imagine how Medicare for All or the Green New Deal is "totalitarianism" while we have a President who is firing witnesses out of revenge, meddling in the sentencing of one of his co-conspirators, while also profiting off his bedbug resorts and roach motels at the taxpayers' expense, deporting immigrants, inciting hatred, fighting to take health care away from people, and calling Nazis "very fine people".
How is Bernie a "globalist"?
Do you mean he's Jewish?
Well, he's not going to be able to get rid of his Jewish identity.
So suck it up, buttercup.
All their policies are racist to the core.
No need to further discuss. You don't believe shit stinks when it comes to republicans.
But you think all Blacks want free shit.
You have been shown video of bloomberg being racist as fuck but you ignore it.
Just vote republican and leave the dem party to the progressives.
Who fucking cares what Donnie Deutche has to say? We don't need Donnie's vote to beat Trump. For every Dumbell Donnie, there are 2-3 non-voters who can be reached far easier.
The strategy shouldn't be to fight for a small sliver of the electorate pie...the strategy should be to make the electorate pie bigger.
I never understood the sense it made to try and convince bad faith actors to vote for someone they have told you, repeatedly, they wouldn't accept no matter who it is.
Again, were we not paying attention to the last 10 years? Conservatives have made it crystal clear they have no interest in voting for any Democrat.
So fuck those people and let's concentrate on turning out just 5% of the 95,000,000 who didn't vote in 2016. That's only 4.8M new voters to get to the polls, which is a much easier task than compromising your values and vision to try and lure people to vote for you who have said, flatly through their words and actions the last 10 years, that they won't under any circumstance.
As soon as you actually work for a living we can talk, until them keep sponging off mom!