Hello gfm7175,
You can't prove that.
Attempted Force of a Negative Proof Fallacy. The religion is yours, not his. The burden of proof is YOURS, not his...
Appeal to Popularity Fallacy.Hello gfm7175,
All the nations of the world signed onto Paris.
See above.So that means that Trump, going against the majority of Americans, and the world,
He does know better than all of them. So do I. They are rejecting logic, science, and mathematics.thinks that he alone, among all the nations of the world, knows better than all of them.
How can you counter that which is undefined? Define "global warming". Define "climate change".The majority recognize the threat is real and are taking the wise approach of taking counter measures.
There is no threat. Science tells us that CO2 cannot heat the Earth's surface. Are you saying that you have falsified the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics?To assume without proof that there is no threat is the height of foolishness.
Are you sure about that?? In doing so, you have lost time, you have lost experiences, you have lost sleep, you have lost money, you have lost resources, etc. etc...If you prepare for a possible threat and it turns out to be not real, nothing lost.
Guess what, we're all gonna be toast anyway, whether "global warming" is occurring or not...If you don't prepare, and it was real, you are toast.
Pascal's Wager Fallacy.The wise move is to prepare.
Wrong. YOU are the one claiming that "global warming" is happening. YOU are the one who needs to support that claim. I need not do anything.Hello gfm7175,
No, actually the burden of proof is yours.
Do tell...Here's why.
Well, except for time, experiences, sanity, money, resources, etc. etc... I'd consider those things to be "something"...If we are wrong and make unnecessary preparations, nothing lost.
Guess what, we're all gonna die anyway, whether "global warming" is happening or not...If you are wrong, and we don't prepare, habitability of the planet is lost, millions die.
Appeal to Popularity Fallacy.You are the side making the unpopular
What claim?and very dangerous claim.
No, YOU are the one claiming that global warming is happening. The burden of proof is on YOU.The burden of proof is on you.
I'm not going to adhere to a religion which outright rejects logic, science, and mathematics.Just accept it and move on to more productive battles.
... we're all gonna die anyway, ...
I'm comfortable denying it because proposed models for "global warming" reject logic, science, and mathematics.Hello gfm7175,
Thanks for letting us know why you are so comfortable with denying the threat of climate change:
I'd like that as well.Personally, I want to live as long as possible, and I want my children and grandchildren to have a nice long life too.
I'd like that as well.And I want all of humanity to continue to flourish for as long as possible.
First, you need to show that something is indeed happening...I don't want to be part of the denier generation that screwed it up for all mankind to follow.
First, you need to show that something is indeed happening...
No it hasn't. Every attempt has been contradictory to logic, science, and mathematics.Hello gfm7175,
No, I don't. That has already been done.
They are outright rejecting logic, science, and mathematics.It is unwise to fail to be prepared for any eventuality, particularly one which is so strongly indicated that all nations on Earth are taking steps to deal with it.
Good for them."Be Prepared," The Boy Scout Motto.
It is not possible to prepare for something that is undefined...There is no wisdom in denying the need to be prepared.
Logic, Science, and Mathematics support my position. Your religion rejects those things.That is foolishness. Assuming you are right when you don't know. Foolish.
You are the one with the religious convictions which reject logic, science, and mathematics... I'm quite happy to stay adherent to those three things...What if you are wrong?
Right on!
We're gonna tax the rich and use the money to fix America.
And we're gonna have high speed low cost public internet. Capitalism sure has let us down there. South Korea has internet almost twice as fast as ours, and they pay about half for it.
Hello anatta,
Once the energy-collecting infrastructure is in place, all we will be paying for is the maintenance and upkeep. The electricity itself will be free, but we will still have to pay to maintain and renew the collection and distribution system as required.
Hello gfm7175,
Thanks for letting us know why you are so comfortable with denying the threat of climate change:
Personally, I want to live as long as possible, and I want my children and grandchildren to have a nice long life too.
And I want all of humanity to continue to flourish for as long as possible.
I don't want to be part of the denier generation that screwed it up for all mankind to follow.
No, it hasn't.Hello gfm7175,
No, I don't. That has already been done.
Consensus is not used in science. Define 'climate change'.It is unwise to fail to be prepared for any eventuality, particularly one which is so strongly indicated that all nations on Earth are taking steps to deal with it.
Prepared for what? Define 'climate science'."Be Prepared," The Boy Scout Motto.
True. Define 'climate science'.There is no wisdom in denying the need to be prepared.
Pascal's Wager fallacy.That is foolishness. Assuming you are right when you don't know. Foolish.
What if you are wrong?
Nobody thinks it will be easy but we'll never get the health care system we need by relying on the for-profit power-junkies whose only concern is increasing profits. That goal lies in opposition to the goal of we the people, just as the goal of caring people to have a safe long lasting planet lies in opposition to that of the big industry wealth extractors.