Bernie Announces High Priority Full Scale Attack On Climate Change Great New Deal.






Russia was on the INSIDE of bernies gig


if Bernie is involved or NOT Devine is tied to Russia


Bernie is NO LONGER VIABLE

he has been infiltrated by Putin
 
Last edited:
Hello gfm7175,

All the nations of the world signed onto Paris.


So that means that Trump, going against the majority of Americans, and the world, thinks that he alone, among all the nations of the world, knows better than all of them.

The majority recognize the threat is real and are taking the wise approach of taking counter measures.

To assume without proof that there is no threat is the height of foolishness.

If you prepare for a possible threat and it turns out to be not real, nothing lost.

If you don't prepare, and it was real, you are toast.

The wise move is to prepare.
 
Hello gfm7175,

Attempted Force of a Negative Proof Fallacy. The religion is yours, not his. The burden of proof is YOURS, not his...

No, actually the burden of proof is yours.

Here's why.

If we are wrong and make unnecessary preparations, nothing lost.

If you are wrong, and we don't prepare, habitability of the planet is lost, millions die.

You are the side making the unpopular and very dangerous claim. The burden of proof is on you.

Just accept it and move on to more productive battles.
 
Hello gfm7175,

All the nations of the world signed onto Paris.
Appeal to Popularity Fallacy.

So that means that Trump, going against the majority of Americans, and the world,
See above.

thinks that he alone, among all the nations of the world, knows better than all of them.
He does know better than all of them. So do I. They are rejecting logic, science, and mathematics.

The majority recognize the threat is real and are taking the wise approach of taking counter measures.
How can you counter that which is undefined? Define "global warming". Define "climate change".

To assume without proof that there is no threat is the height of foolishness.
There is no threat. Science tells us that CO2 cannot heat the Earth's surface. Are you saying that you have falsified the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics?

If you prepare for a possible threat and it turns out to be not real, nothing lost.
Are you sure about that?? In doing so, you have lost time, you have lost experiences, you have lost sleep, you have lost money, you have lost resources, etc. etc...

If you don't prepare, and it was real, you are toast.
Guess what, we're all gonna be toast anyway, whether "global warming" is occurring or not...

The wise move is to prepare.
Pascal's Wager Fallacy.
 
Where is Biden's massive aggressive plan to save the world from climate change?

Oh, here it is. Right there on his website:

"Biden believes the Green New Deal is a crucial framework for meeting the climate challenges we face. "

SAME AS BERNIE ... well sort of. Biden puts 1.7 trillion towards it, Bernie takes is seriously, 16 Trillion.

I'd rather have serious climate action.

Changing climate is a serious threat to humanity.
 
Last edited:
Hello gfm7175,

No, actually the burden of proof is yours.
Wrong. YOU are the one claiming that "global warming" is happening. YOU are the one who needs to support that claim. I need not do anything.

Here's why.
Do tell...

If we are wrong and make unnecessary preparations, nothing lost.
Well, except for time, experiences, sanity, money, resources, etc. etc... I'd consider those things to be "something"...

If you are wrong, and we don't prepare, habitability of the planet is lost, millions die.
Guess what, we're all gonna die anyway, whether "global warming" is happening or not...

You are the side making the unpopular
Appeal to Popularity Fallacy.

and very dangerous claim.
What claim?

The burden of proof is on you.
No, YOU are the one claiming that global warming is happening. The burden of proof is on YOU.

Just accept it and move on to more productive battles.
I'm not going to adhere to a religion which outright rejects logic, science, and mathematics.
 
Hello gfm7175,

Thanks for letting us know why you are so comfortable with denying the threat of climate change:

... we're all gonna die anyway, ...

Personally, I want to live as long as possible, and I want my children and grandchildren to have a nice long life too.

And I want all of humanity to continue to flourish for as long as possible.

I don't want to be part of the denier generation that screwed it up for all mankind to follow.
 
Hello gfm7175,

Thanks for letting us know why you are so comfortable with denying the threat of climate change:
I'm comfortable denying it because proposed models for "global warming" reject logic, science, and mathematics.

Personally, I want to live as long as possible, and I want my children and grandchildren to have a nice long life too.
I'd like that as well.

And I want all of humanity to continue to flourish for as long as possible.
I'd like that as well.

I don't want to be part of the denier generation that screwed it up for all mankind to follow.
First, you need to show that something is indeed happening...
 
Hello gfm7175,

First, you need to show that something is indeed happening...

No, I don't. That has already been done.

It is unwise to fail to be prepared for any eventuality, particularly one which is so strongly indicated that all nations on Earth are taking steps to deal with it.

"Be Prepared," The Boy Scout Motto.

There is no wisdom in denying the need to be prepared.

That is foolishness. Assuming you are right when you don't know. Foolish.

What if you are wrong?
 
Hello gfm7175,

No, I don't. That has already been done.
No it hasn't. Every attempt has been contradictory to logic, science, and mathematics.

It is unwise to fail to be prepared for any eventuality, particularly one which is so strongly indicated that all nations on Earth are taking steps to deal with it.
They are outright rejecting logic, science, and mathematics.

"Be Prepared," The Boy Scout Motto.
Good for them.

There is no wisdom in denying the need to be prepared.
It is not possible to prepare for something that is undefined...

That is foolishness. Assuming you are right when you don't know. Foolish.
Logic, Science, and Mathematics support my position. Your religion rejects those things.

What if you are wrong?
You are the one with the religious convictions which reject logic, science, and mathematics... I'm quite happy to stay adherent to those three things...
 
Right on!

We're gonna tax the rich and use the money to fix America.

And we're gonna have high speed low cost public internet. Capitalism sure has let us down there. South Korea has internet almost twice as fast as ours, and they pay about half for it.

Vote for free stuff and live and slavery.

As far as South Korea is concerned, they are:
* much smaller than the United States, and
* are a technology center.
 
Hello anatta,



Once the energy-collecting infrastructure is in place, all we will be paying for is the maintenance and upkeep. The electricity itself will be free, but we will still have to pay to maintain and renew the collection and distribution system as required.

Not enough energy. Not in a form suitable for mobile power supplies either.
 
Hello gfm7175,

Thanks for letting us know why you are so comfortable with denying the threat of climate change:



Personally, I want to live as long as possible, and I want my children and grandchildren to have a nice long life too.

And I want all of humanity to continue to flourish for as long as possible.

I don't want to be part of the denier generation that screwed it up for all mankind to follow.

Define 'climate change'.
 
Hello gfm7175,
No, I don't. That has already been done.
No, it hasn't.
It is unwise to fail to be prepared for any eventuality, particularly one which is so strongly indicated that all nations on Earth are taking steps to deal with it.
Consensus is not used in science. Define 'climate change'.
"Be Prepared," The Boy Scout Motto.
Prepared for what? Define 'climate science'.
There is no wisdom in denying the need to be prepared.
True. Define 'climate science'.
That is foolishness. Assuming you are right when you don't know. Foolish.
What if you are wrong?
Pascal's Wager fallacy.
 
Nobody thinks it will be easy but we'll never get the health care system we need by relying on the for-profit power-junkies whose only concern is increasing profits. That goal lies in opposition to the goal of we the people, just as the goal of caring people to have a safe long lasting planet lies in opposition to that of the big industry wealth extractors.

Yes, but just because the Medical Industry, prescription drugs, and the Healthcare Insurance world has out-priced most of Americans, does not mean that it is not working for the privileged class.

Taking away what is working for them, and then adding them to Medicare is like trying to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

What responsible leaders in America are really trying to do is help the families and the ones that fall through the cracks that actually and factually need help- you know? - the other 220 million people.

So, the only thing that needs to be done, is keep the choice for all Americans available. You need help?- You'll sign up for the Government option. If you are happy paying for profit-insurance, or insurance that is supplemented by your job, knock yourselves out.

Help the ones that need the help! What a NOVEL idea! Duh! This is not Brain salad surgery!
 
Back
Top