Ben Bernanke needs to go...

Yeah this is solid evidence. Thanks.

I don't have time to lay the shit out for you, but I decided to start with this. I realize that since it is Republicans calling for his head now, he is now a liberals best friend. So I get why you felt the need to just make a stupid one line sarcastic comment to get your worthless ass noticed. Go cook some chicken!

Anyways, as 2004 discovery begins in the WaMu case against JPMorgan, there will be more information come out about Bernanke's involvement in that. This will be an ongoing thread, much like my WaMu thread. That's my style, and if you look at that thread, I posted something very similar at the begining. Very general statement, that got much more detailed as things progressed.
 
Yup, Issa is the final word. He didn;t have much to say about Greenspan and his old pal Cox when all the trouble began. Paulson's next, lets see Issa's reaction.

I could give two shits about Issa, or the fact he didn't pipe up about Cox. This isn't about Issa. He's just another pawn in the end game, and all he's trying to do is look like a hero like all other worthless politicians do. Paulson is probably worse than Bernanke, but any nimrod who does their own due diligence would see that. Again, this isn't about him either.
 
keep up the good reporting DD, i'm liking it.

I would have thought Bernanke repeatedly saying "I don't remember", or "I don't recall" would have been a key indicator that he's hiding something, but CNBC still loves him, and praises him for 'turning the market around'. All they could say today was how the market 'fought off the Bernanke' grilling. Pathetic reporting. Just pathetic. They have the access to do some real research but they refuse. They could do the same for WaMu, but I can only find ONE journalist that actually put the story of 2004 Discovery out there. Thanks again to Peg Brinkley. The only other thing I could find on it was something on law.com.

Bernanke was key in causing the market's crash in the first place. He, along with Paulson and Bair, orchestrated a move to prop up both JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs. Of course, they tryed to minimize the damage by forcing well capitalized banks into saving other banks. Bernanke clearly pushed BAC into the deal, but what isn't clear is how much, and who is lying under oath.

Lastly, Republicans are basically trying to prevent the new regulatory powers going to the Fed. Issa overstepped his bounds, trying to be the hero, without enough evidence. But he did get one more "I don't recall" out of Ben.
 
boy George thinks your obsession with WAMU is gay.

Top, don't... If you think you are gonna boost your ego by posting lame one liners at an attempt to recover that which you lost in the last grilling I gave you, you are sadly mistaken. BTW, how was your last 'rimjob escapade'?
 
hahah I'm making fun of you tough guy, quit your crying brittney spears fan on utube thinks your a baby.
 
There is no crying, only feel pity for you. I'm just helping you out, making sure you don't get caught in another disaster.

Afterall, it's obvious that you invest in oil companies because you know it's used in the lube for your rimjob parties. As much of that shit you use, you might as well. I don't blame you for wanting to profit off your own adventures. Even the Britney Spears crybaby is making some coin off his classic rant, and from what I hear, you met him out on your yacht.
 
http://www.ronpaul.com/2009-07-07/senate-leadership-blocks-federal-reserve-audit/

Look's like Senate Dem's are blocking the Sunshine Bill made to audit the fed based on a 'Rule 16' technicality. In reality, the Dem's are very guilty of ignoring rule 16 in the bill they are trying to amend, many multiple times. Just watch the clip to see the hypocrisy.

That's right, the Dem's, like Barney Frank, is protecting the Fed and Bernanke from being found out. What are they afraid we might find?
 
Back
Top