More thoughts...
More and more I don't see any functional distinction between being legally barred from doing something and being either too busy or too poor to do something.
In communism, the store is illegal; in capitalism, the store is legal but you can't afford to shop there. In communism, the shelves are empty; in capitalism, the shelves are full but your wallet is empty. In communism, they only make the things that people absolutely need; in capitalism, you don't buy anything you don't absolutely need. In communism, private property is illegal; in capitalism, private property is legal but you can't afford it. In communism, they don't allow you a vacation; in capitalism, you can't afford to take time off from work. In communism, a bureaucrat is always telling you what to do; in capitalism, a manager is always telling you what to do. In communism, a tiny elite enriches itself at society's expense; in capitalism, it's the same.
Same diff IMO.
Dmitri Orlov in his book "Reinventing Collapse" had a lot of good things to say about how he saw the Soviet Union as fundamentally more able (and ideologically willing) to provide basic services (food, shelter, education, medical care) to more people than the far wealthier USA, and how he believed that the society the Soviet Union built was more resilient than that of the USA.
I've read Dmitri Orlov's book and recommend it to anyone interested in what we're seeing in this country and how it's being sold.
Thanks, I just picked up, "The Human Stain", "The Real Crash"