christiefan915
Catalyst
Maybe we should get a group together and complain about webbway, if that's all it takes.
Beck's holocaust comments: OTT?
- Thread starter Cancel 2018. 3
- Start date
Maybe we should get a group together and complain about webbway, if that's all it takes.
cawacko
Well-known member
Zurt was a troll. I just ignored him and didn't respond to him. Do the same to webway if you feel that way.
I do
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
why should he be banned? zurt broke numerous rules repeatedly....whta has webbway done....
seems you want to silence those y8ou don't agree with
christiefan915
Catalyst
How can you tell who's a troll nowadays? Check the section called "The most members online over 24 hours". Every day there are names of new people who never post. Are they trolls, lurkers, bots?
I reply to people based on content. It's just hard to tell who's on the up-and-up and who's not.
cawacko
Well-known member
First off look at his name. It's not a coincidence he named himself Zurt. The guy has numerous trolls.
We pretty much know who the core posters are on this board. There aren't too many hit and run posters that aren't trolls.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Wow, another "Yurt-ism" for my collection. Just like these:
-dishonest hackery
-legion troll
-do you enjoy lying all the time? because you do it nearly everyday
-still keeping up the lies and hackery
-how dishonest
-failed....
-don't support your false correlation huh.
-your attempt at proving correlation was a miserable failure
-this is stupid, if you make a claim, it is up to you to back it up
-you have lied and you do not always back your claims up.
-its comical to watch you whine daily about neg reps
-thats dishonest
-learn to read
-nice try, care to try again
-keep hacking away, it only makes you look like a fool
-good lord, that is dishonest and stupid
-its so dishonest, but kind of cute because its so typical of your partisan rhetoric
-translation: damn, yurt showed me up again so i will ad hom and continue running from my embarrassing hypocrisy and stupidity
-its beneath even you to peddle this nonsense
I don't know which rules Zurt broke repeatedly but there can't be any more than that have been broken repeatedly by many other posters. I know you didn't like him, but he didn't do anything different from what others are doing. In fact, your own words: "he follows me all over the interwebs, its annoying, but not bannable annoying."
So what changed?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
wow....talk about ocd
you want him banished solely because you don't like his viewpoints...the mods felt zurt needed banning, i have no idea why....his stalking is not a bannable offense...his other rule violations, like posting personal info, probably finally ticked the mods off....
seriously, there is no contradiction in my statement, weird how you found one
add that to my yurtisms....
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
christiefan915
Catalyst
wow....talk about ocd
you want him banished solely because you don't like his viewpoints...the mods felt zurt needed banning, i have no idea why....his stalking is not a bannable offense...his other rule violations, like posting personal info, probably finally ticked the mods off....
seriously, there is no contradiction in my statement, weird how you found one
add that to my yurtisms....
No, I want him banned because he's a shit-stirrer who posts ugly, vulgar and racist comments, apparently for the fun of it. You only overlook them because they're all directed at liberals.
Now let's look at the posts.
christie: I'll never understand why this guy isn't banned, yet Zurt got flagged and he posted on real topics.
yurt: why should he [Zurt] be banned? zurt broke numerous rules repeatedly
christie: he didn't do anything different from what others are doing.
yurt: "he follows me all over the interwebs, its annoying, but not bannable annoying."
First you said he should be banned because he broke numerous rules repeatedly. Then you say he's annoying but not bannable annoying.
So yes, you did contradict yourself.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
bullshit...i've caled him numerous times, he doesn't listen nor care....so i've stopped for the most part
:Now let's look at the posts.
christie: I'll never understand why this guy isn't banned, yet Zurt got flagged and he posted on real topics.
yurt: why should he [Zurt] be banned? zurt broke numerous rules repeatedly
christie: he didn't do anything different from what others are doing.
yurt: "he follows me all over the interwebs, its annoying, but not bannable annoying."
First you said he should be banned because he broke numerous rules repeatedly. Then you say he's annoying but not bannable annoying.
So yes, you did contradict yourself.alm
what a liar....my comment was not in response to anything you said
i said ONE thing he did is not bannable, that does not contradict if he does other things....good lord
cawacko
Well-known member
No, I want him banned because he's a shit-stirrer who posts ugly, vulgar and racist comments, apparently for the fun of it. You only overlook them because they're all directed at liberals.
Now let's look at the posts.
christie: I'll never understand why this guy isn't banned, yet Zurt got flagged and he posted on real topics.
yurt: why should he [Zurt] be banned? zurt broke numerous rules repeatedly
christie: he didn't do anything different from what others are doing.
yurt: "he follows me all over the interwebs, its annoying, but not bannable annoying."
First you said he should be banned because he broke numerous rules repeatedly. Then you say he's annoying but not bannable annoying.
So yes, you did contradict yourself.
just to moderate this i see what yurt said. He said Zurt followed him and trolled him however that is not a bannable offense. Then Yurt said he broke some other rules that the mods must have found bannable. So they are two different situations. Not taking sides just saying what I see.
And my unasked for advice Christi is if you and other liberals don't like webbway then don't respond to him. Ignore him.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
No, I want him banned because he's a shit-stirrer who posts ugly, vulgar and racist comments, apparently for the fun of it. You only overlook them because they're all directed at liberals.
Now let's look at the posts.
christie: I'll never understand why this guy isn't banned, yet Zurt got flagged and he posted on real topics.
yurt: why should he [Zurt] be banned? zurt broke numerous rules repeatedly
christie: he didn't do anything different from what others are doing.
yurt: "he follows me all over the interwebs, its annoying, but not bannable annoying."
First you said he should be banned because he broke numerous rules repeatedly. Then you say he's annoying but not bannable annoying.
So yes, you did contradict yourself.
Speaking of shit stirrers, make sure you don't hit yourself with that big old wooden spoon.
christiefan915
Catalyst
You're right, because spurtski never posted opinions, while Zurt did.
Oh, I don't see any member named yurtski.
Thumbs'-down to you for lying!
christiefan915
Catalyst
I read carefully, too. Rana and I were discussing webbway vs. yurt, and I said to Rana that I wondered why Zurt was banned. yurt jumped in here and stated rhetorically "why should he be banned? He broke numerous rules repeatedly."
Scroll down to yurt saying "what a liar....my comment was not in response to anything you said..."
WTH? He directly responded to something I said, and then denied it.
cawacko
Well-known member
Well if you read carefully then you read better than I do.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
cawacko is right, they are two different situations...i called you a liar because you said this was in response:
i never said that in response to you in this thread, that is a lie...you claimed that is how the posts or conversation went....that is simply untrue...and you are here again claiming i said that in "direct" response to something you said and you're trying to make it out as if i said that in response to "he didn't do anything different from what others are doing."
here is the post and it is in response to athena, so unless you're athena, you're lying:
as we can see...i'm only talking about his following me around the interwebs as not being a bannable offense...and if you read athena post (assuming you are not her) you can see why i talk about following....
seriously christie...whats up
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
You're right, because spurtski never posted opinions, while Zurt did.
Oh, I don't see any member named yurtski.
Thumbs'-down to you for lying!
you got me...i guess i don't remember all his numerous trolls created in my honor
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
I KNOW THIS DOESN'T MATTER TO YOU SOROS PROPAGANDISTS, BUT HERE GOES...
ADL's massive flip flop on Beck
November 12, 2010 - 12:59 ET
GLENN: (Laughing). So last night I'm on the set and my producers come down and some of the executives come down from, you know, the high rise down to the studio, and I can always tell by the look on their face when there's trouble. And they said New York Times is going to run a story you're an anti Semite. And I said, oh, am I? Is that what I am now? Really? I'm an anti Semite?
So here in a nutshell is just some of the highlights from the New York Times story. Stu, you want to take this?
STU: Yes, I definitely do.
GLENN: Yeah.
STU: I find it interesting, especially when you're about to read this letter that they did not use, it's almost as if they either didn't even read their own article or it's hard to even understand how this occurs, but they talk about how evil you are and everything and how you're being attacked for saying things that are horrific and offensive, blah, blah blah, blah blah. But the two quotes, living two paragraphs away from each other, are particularly interesting. It says you're talking about how George Soros, his childhood and the horrible things that happened in his childhood and you say, quote: I am certainly not saying that George Soros enjoyed that, even had a choice. I mean, he's 14 years old. He was surviving. So I'm not making a judgment.
GLENN: Okay. Hang on just a second. I want you to read that again and, Pat, can you find the audio of George Soros where he says it was the best year of his life?
PAT: I'll look for it.
GLENN: I mean, I'm even giving him the credit that he didn't enjoy it, although even though he said himself it was the best year of his life. But I'm willing to say, okay, well, I'm missing some subtleties here, you know, in the Holocaust years.
STU: Yeah. I mean, you know, look
Related: ADL Leader Praises Beck’s Support of Israel — Last Month
GLENN: Life is beautiful. It's the story of life is beautiful. I'm willing to go there.
STU: So here's the quote again from you: I am certainly not saying that George Soros enjoyed that, even if he had a excuse me. I am certainly not saying that George Soros enjoyed that, even had a choice. I mean, he's 14 years old. He was surviving. So I am not making a judgment, end quote.
Then two paragraphs later from Abe Foxman attacking you saying, quote: To hold a young boy responsible for what was going on around him during the Holocaust as part of a larger effort to denigrate the man is repugnant.
Did you even see the segment? Did you see the segment? Did you read the quote or did you just take an e mail from someone else and just pop something out?
GLENN: Abe
STU: I don't understand this.
GLENN: Abe, here is what I would and I don't share personal letters, but I'm going to share yours because this I find absolutely incredible from the Anti Defamation League. ADL and we never mentioned this on the air. ADL sent a direct mail piece before the elections out to their supporters, and in that direct mail piece they identified me as a guy making anti Semitic comments. I never once said anything on the air. But we did bring it up to the ADL and say, uh, hello. Can you name those anti Semitic comments, please? Hello.
We received this letter: Dear Glenn, a direct mail piece recently sent to some ADL supporters around the country inadvertently misidentified you on the list of celebrities that had made anti Semitic statements over the past year. This was clearly a mistake and we deeply regret that your name was included in the mailing which was produced by an independent third party contractor. I hope you will accept my personal responsibility my personal apologies.
He could have ended the letter there, but he didn't. "Even though we may disagree from time to time, I know that you are a friend of the Jewish people and a friend of Israel. Sincerely, Abe Foxman, national director of the ADL."
PAT: Okay, but that was what? 1993?
GLENN: It was October 22nd, 2010. So it was way
PAT: Way, way, way back.
GLENN: You've got to go into the time machine.
PAT: Last month.
GLENN: Way back.
PAT: Way back to late last month to get that.
GLENN: That letter is they didn't find any relevance in that at all. That letter was not included in the New York Times. It is on the front page of TheBlaze.com today.
PAT: Of course they didn't include it.
STU: Unbelievable.
PAT: Because if the New York Times includes that story, they don't have a story!
STU: Yep, don't have a story. They have to
PAT: There is not a thing they can say about it.
STU: Yeah. They just have to not post something.
PAT: Something.
STU: I mean, they are certainly not going to the point of proving that this is an obviously political, an obviously political attack.
GLENN: Here's the thing.
PAT: It's a hack job.
GLENN: Here's the thing.
STU: Horrible.
http://www.glennbeck.com/content/videos/?uri=channels/390088/1079360
ADL's massive flip flop on Beck
November 12, 2010 - 12:59 ET
GLENN: (Laughing). So last night I'm on the set and my producers come down and some of the executives come down from, you know, the high rise down to the studio, and I can always tell by the look on their face when there's trouble. And they said New York Times is going to run a story you're an anti Semite. And I said, oh, am I? Is that what I am now? Really? I'm an anti Semite?
So here in a nutshell is just some of the highlights from the New York Times story. Stu, you want to take this?
STU: Yes, I definitely do.
GLENN: Yeah.
STU: I find it interesting, especially when you're about to read this letter that they did not use, it's almost as if they either didn't even read their own article or it's hard to even understand how this occurs, but they talk about how evil you are and everything and how you're being attacked for saying things that are horrific and offensive, blah, blah blah, blah blah. But the two quotes, living two paragraphs away from each other, are particularly interesting. It says you're talking about how George Soros, his childhood and the horrible things that happened in his childhood and you say, quote: I am certainly not saying that George Soros enjoyed that, even had a choice. I mean, he's 14 years old. He was surviving. So I'm not making a judgment.
GLENN: Okay. Hang on just a second. I want you to read that again and, Pat, can you find the audio of George Soros where he says it was the best year of his life?
PAT: I'll look for it.
GLENN: I mean, I'm even giving him the credit that he didn't enjoy it, although even though he said himself it was the best year of his life. But I'm willing to say, okay, well, I'm missing some subtleties here, you know, in the Holocaust years.
STU: Yeah. I mean, you know, look
Related: ADL Leader Praises Beck’s Support of Israel — Last Month
GLENN: Life is beautiful. It's the story of life is beautiful. I'm willing to go there.
STU: So here's the quote again from you: I am certainly not saying that George Soros enjoyed that, even if he had a excuse me. I am certainly not saying that George Soros enjoyed that, even had a choice. I mean, he's 14 years old. He was surviving. So I am not making a judgment, end quote.
Then two paragraphs later from Abe Foxman attacking you saying, quote: To hold a young boy responsible for what was going on around him during the Holocaust as part of a larger effort to denigrate the man is repugnant.
Did you even see the segment? Did you see the segment? Did you read the quote or did you just take an e mail from someone else and just pop something out?
GLENN: Abe
STU: I don't understand this.
GLENN: Abe, here is what I would and I don't share personal letters, but I'm going to share yours because this I find absolutely incredible from the Anti Defamation League. ADL and we never mentioned this on the air. ADL sent a direct mail piece before the elections out to their supporters, and in that direct mail piece they identified me as a guy making anti Semitic comments. I never once said anything on the air. But we did bring it up to the ADL and say, uh, hello. Can you name those anti Semitic comments, please? Hello.
We received this letter: Dear Glenn, a direct mail piece recently sent to some ADL supporters around the country inadvertently misidentified you on the list of celebrities that had made anti Semitic statements over the past year. This was clearly a mistake and we deeply regret that your name was included in the mailing which was produced by an independent third party contractor. I hope you will accept my personal responsibility my personal apologies.
He could have ended the letter there, but he didn't. "Even though we may disagree from time to time, I know that you are a friend of the Jewish people and a friend of Israel. Sincerely, Abe Foxman, national director of the ADL."
PAT: Okay, but that was what? 1993?
GLENN: It was October 22nd, 2010. So it was way
PAT: Way, way, way back.
GLENN: You've got to go into the time machine.
PAT: Last month.
GLENN: Way back.
PAT: Way back to late last month to get that.
GLENN: That letter is they didn't find any relevance in that at all. That letter was not included in the New York Times. It is on the front page of TheBlaze.com today.
PAT: Of course they didn't include it.
STU: Unbelievable.
PAT: Because if the New York Times includes that story, they don't have a story!
STU: Yep, don't have a story. They have to
PAT: There is not a thing they can say about it.
STU: Yeah. They just have to not post something.
PAT: Something.
STU: I mean, they are certainly not going to the point of proving that this is an obviously political, an obviously political attack.
GLENN: Here's the thing.
PAT: It's a hack job.
GLENN: Here's the thing.
STU: Horrible.
http://www.glennbeck.com/content/videos/?uri=channels/390088/1079360
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Yeah, nothing happened in that whole exchange.
Anyway, guys, the JPP mods never ban people on the offensiveness of their posts. There are about two rules and the mods have enough trouble keeping people from violating those as it is.
Anyway, guys, the JPP mods never ban people on the offensiveness of their posts. There are about two rules and the mods have enough trouble keeping people from violating those as it is.