Because all humans are made in the image of God…

So why has the THEORY of evolution changed dozens of times? Evolution is statistically improbable.

Some calculations indicate that the probability of complex organisms evolving by random mutation and natural selection is less than one in a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion.
That is what theories do, they change to meet the data.

Some calculations are not all calculations and while they should be considered, they are not definitive.
 
How do you square evolution with statistics. Do you realize randomly changing into a complex human genome is statistically improbable.
Statistics show that if you calculate backwards, the chances of a human developing from a single cell are outrageously unlikely. but if the theory is correct, on of those unlikely outcomes came to be, and this happens to be it.

Imagine if 100,000,000,000 people were shipwrecked, and the odds were a billion to one that one survived, you would have a survivor. It was not impossible to have a survivor, in fact it was very likely you would have one survivor.

Under Evolution, imagine the trillions of years and trillions of different groups developing and going extinct, yet there is a group of animals at the present date. The odds of any one specific life forms surviving were small, but the odds of some life forms surviving are good, and so here we are.

And FINALLY the bible does not say that Evolution did not happen, it says God created humans in his image. His image is infinite, the bible does not say God is a guy with a white beard sitting on a thrown. In my opinion the process we are calling evolution is Godly and a result of time. God created time, and time is the thing that made evolution happen, and we are the result.
 
Last edited:
That is what theories do, they change to meet the data.

Some calculations are not all calculations and while they should be considered, they are not definitive.
the theory of evolution is centered around the concept now isn't eternity same as the creation theology God did it that both believe genetics doesn't follow a universal algorithm.

Tie both to demanding economic theories control people 7 days a week and everyone factually argues both until extinction arrives since everyone agrees genetic results cannot be eternally separated in plain sight daily here.

But it has all the time in plain sight of each reproduction's brain navigating space in series parallel displacement now since arriving a fertilized cell..
 
Statistics show that if you calculate backwards, the chances of a human developing from a single cell are outrageously unlikely. but if the theory is correct, on of those unlikely outcomes came to be, and this happens to be it.

Imagine if 100,000,000,000 people were shipwrecked, and the odds were a billion to one that one survived, you would have a survivor. It was not impossible to have a survivor, in fact it was very likely you would have one survivor.

Under Evolution, imagine the trillions of years and trillions of different groups developing and going extinct, yet there is a group of animals at the present date. The odds of any one specific life forms surviving were small, but the odds of some life forms surviving are good, and so here we are.
Irrelevant now try addressing the posters point. Oh that's right, you never can.
 
So why has the THEORY of evolution changed dozens of times? Evolution is statistically improbable.
The basic idea of descent with modification by natural selection has not changed since Darwin and Wallace first proposed it. What has changed is the neo-Darwinian synthesis, which brought natural selection and genetics together. Darwin couldn't address genetics because nobody knew what genes were in the 1860s.
Some calculations indicate that the probability of complex organisms evolving by random mutation and natural selection is less than one in a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion.
You are confusing descent by natural selection and genetic mutation with the origin of life.

The nut science cannot seem to crack is how complex information-bearing molecules like DNA and RNA could have assembled by chance. The statistical probability is basically zero. There is presumed to be some unknown catalyst that makes the odds more favorable, but nobody really knows what it is.
 
the theory of evolution is centered around the concept now isn't eternity same as the creation theology God did it that both believe genetics doesn't follow a universal algorithm.

Tie both to demanding economic theories control people 7 days a week and everyone factually argues both until extinction arrives since everyone agrees genetic results cannot be eternally separated in plain sight daily here.

But it has all the time in plain sight of each reproduction's brain navigating space in series parallel displacement now since arriving a fertilized cell..
Derp Derp
 
There is not 0 evidence, but as I said, as time goes by, it will likely be filled in and amended. We know for example there are genetic mutations, that are sometimes advantageous, and that those with the propensity toward that "mutation" would likely have more offspring eventually resulting in a race of people where that "mutation" is no longer a mutation, but normal anatomy. There is a lot of evidence, but not all that one would need to call it a law of nature.

I believe it has struck on the correct path to figure it out, and is a step away from the magical thinking of religion. Humanity has historically "filled in the gaps" with religion or magic until science takes its place. Science should not (and does not seem to ) invade on the area of mythology, and Religion should not step on the toes of science. They are different ways of describing what we see, and they both have their place.

The Theory of Evolution does not say we evolved from Monkeys. Only a simpleton says that.
Jarod a genome as complex as the human genome is statistically HIGHLY improbable to the point of impossible. There is simply not enough time for Man to evolve into the complex genome we are.

No one has ever actually observed a genuine mutation occurring in the natural environment which was beneficial (that is, adding useful genetic information to an existing genetic code), and therefore, retained by the selection process. Most genetic mutations are harmful and cause death or disability. Trisomy 21 for example. Likewise Trisomy 13 and 18 aren't beneficial.


Jarod give me an example of a genetic mutation that has been beneficial and has been added to the human genome.
 
Jarod a genome as complex as the human genome is statistically HIGHLY improbable to the point of impossible. There is simply not enough time for Man to evolve into the complex genome we are.

No one has ever actually observed a genuine mutation occurring in the natural environment which was beneficial (that is, adding useful genetic information to an existing genetic code), and therefore, retained by the selection process. Most genetic mutations are harmful and cause death or disability. Trisomy 21 for example. Likewise Trisomy 13 and 18 all aren't beneficial.
how do you know how much time there was?
 
How do you square evolution with statistics. Do you realize randomly changing into a complex human genome is statistically improbable.
Look at that last paragraph again, that one was answered before it was asked.

I am always amazed by this stubbornness among believers. To me, this shows the tools God used to create man, it doesn't show that God doesn't exist or that God didn't form man. Stand in amazement and wonder at the record that shows how it was done, rather than try to pretend there is no record.
 
Statistics show that if you calculate backwards, the chances of a human developing from a single cell are outrageously unlikely. but if the theory is correct, on of those unlikely outcomes came to be, and this happens to be it.

Imagine if 100,000,000,000 people were shipwrecked, and the odds were a billion to one that one survived, you would have a survivor. It was not impossible to have a survivor, in fact it was very likely you would have one survivor.

Under Evolution, imagine the trillions of years and trillions of different groups developing and going extinct, yet there is a group of animals at the present date. The odds of any one specific life forms surviving were small, but the odds of some life forms surviving are good, and so here we are.

And FINALLY the bible does not say that Evolution did not happen, it says God created humans in his image. His image is infinite, the bible does not say God is a guy with a white beard sitting on a thrown. In my opinion the process we are calling evolution is Godly and a result of time. God created time, and time is the thing that made evolution happen, and we are the result.
That is a ridiculous explanation of why evolution can square with statistics. It shows you have no concept of why evolution and statistics are not comparable. The Bible also does not support evolution. It says God made a Man that even had ribs. He didn't create a one cell organism that evolved into a human
 
Incorrect.

People observed the British pepper moth evolve in real time from a white speckled color to a solid black color because black provided better camouflage on the coal soot-covered trees in 19th century industrial England.
As I said adaptation is a real thing. Now show me where a moth change into another species. For evolution to work one species has to change into another species.
 
Last edited:
Jarod a genome as complex as the human genome is statistically HIGHLY improbable to the point of impossible. There is simply not enough time for Man to evolve into the complex genome we are.

No one has ever actually observed a genuine mutation occurring in the natural environment which was beneficial (that is, adding useful genetic information to an existing genetic code), and therefore, retained by the selection process. Most genetic mutations are harmful and cause death or disability. Trisomy 21 for example. Likewise Trisomy 13 and 18 aren't beneficial.


Jarod give me an example of a genetic mutation that has been beneficial and has been added to the human genome.
^^^
More proof Ms. Fat Lame lied about being a doctor and is likely to be a drug dealer.

How Sickle Cell Disease and Malaria Defined Evolution​

But being a carrier of the sickle cell gene has had an evolutionary benefit: those with just one copy of the sickle cell gene avoid the worst symptoms of the disease, and are also protected against malaria.



Genetic mutations you want​

To cure disease, researchers are starting to scour the genomes of the abnormally healthy.
 
That is a ridiculous explanation of why evolution can square with statistics. It shows you have no concept of why evolution and statistics are not comparable. The Bible also does not support evolution. It says God made a Man that even had ribs. He didn't create a one cell organism that evolved into a human
^^^
Lied about being a doctor.
 
The basic idea of descent with modification by natural selection has not changed since Darwin and Wallace first proposed it. What has changed is the neo-Darwinian synthesis, which brought natural selection and genetics together. Darwin couldn't address genetics because nobody knew what genes were in the 1860s.

You are confusing descent by natural selection and genetic mutation with the origin of life.

The nut science cannot seem to crack is how complex information-bearing molecules like DNA and RNA could have assembled by chance. The statistical probability is basically zero. There is presumed to be some unknown catalyst that makes the odds more favorable, but nobody really knows what it is.
so you're anti-science then?
 
That is a ridiculous explanation of why evolution can square with statistics. It shows you have no concept of why evolution and statistics are not comparable. The Bible also does not support evolution. It says God made a Man that even had ribs. He didn't create a one cell organism that evolved into a human
He made Eve out of a rib from Adam. Possible that means, the different sexes were something that humanity evolved into, which would make sense, because single cells are not different sexes. There are many unknowns, and the claims attributed to "God" are open to a huge amount of human interpretation. God does not speak human language, or even exist in a realm of time. The message from God was not delivered in a way it could literally be put into human language considering how limited human language must be to a "God" that does not operate under the constraints of Time or Space.
 
Back
Top