but the main moral teaching of christianity also happens to be quite rational.There has never been any proof of any religion. They are all matters of faith.
You'll notice that you don't need to justify to anyone your WACKY religious belief that Trump is somehow a pedophile for which you have absolutely no proof.
The golden rule is quite rational, yes.but the main moral teaching of christianity also happens to be quite rational.
The intellectual basis of Christianity is grounded in a historical event and a historical man.There has never been any proof of any religion!!
Just another intellectual culture club of like minded people never accepted the characteristics since conception trying to prove who they became socially acting larger than their time alive after birth.freemason are evil bankster cocksucker fucktards.
but it's actual value is in the revolutionary golden rule, which is unique to Christianity.The intellectual basis of Christianity is grounded in a historical event and a historical man.
You just have to choose if the first century testimonial accounts are lies, fabrications, and mischaracterizations; or whether there is reliable testimony to support the historicity of the crucifixion and resurrection.
Jesus even mentioned the hazards of bloody oaths.Just another intellectual culture club of like minded people never accepted the characteristics since conception trying to prove who they became socially acting larger than their time alive after birth.
Thespians are no worse or better orchestrating chaos against any ancestor not complyingto social consensus cradle to grave.
Freemasons invent social institutions, thespians train brains to mind the new world order through political science, religious philosophies intellect is a higher plane of evolution than genetics has by itself, and economic theories building better 7 tomorrows than generation gaps currently alive.
Metaphors only confuse, metaphysics misdirect ancestries lived so far, money misleads current generation gaps away from accepting all they were since conception trying to prove they are larger than evolving in plain sight cradle to grave..Jesus even mentioned the hazards of bloody oaths.
let your yes be yes, and your no be no.
no.Metaphors only confuse, metaphysics misdirect ancestries lived so far, money misleads current generation gaps away from accepting all they were since conception trying to prove they are larger than evolving in plain sight cradle to grave..
my god pussy just dried up.The intellectual basis of Christianity is grounded in a historical event and a historical man.
You just have to decide whether the first century testimonial accounts are lies, fabrications, and mischaracterizations; or whether there is reliable testimony to support the historicity of the crucifixion and resurrection.
Interpreation defines things separately than ideas delivered. Live evolves one way only eternally separating results currently adapting in space now..no.
metaphors are great.
you say smart things, you say dumb things.
6,7.
so metaphors are better than others.Interpreation defines things separately than ideas delivered. Live evolves one way only eternally separating results currently adapting in space now..
Charcteristics are physical results adapting in plain sight.so metaphors are better than others.
that;s true.
some emphasize the wrong characteristics of a thing to deceptive effect.
characteristics are more broad than that.Charcteristics are physical results adapting in plain sight.
Characters are performing ideas life isn't time alive adapting forward now.
Intellectually debating anything else is possible, yes. Physically existing universally present, no.characteristics are more broad than that.
No hate. The message from the founder is fine. It’s just that the messengers are mostly assholes. And the churches themselves are nothing more than businesses delivering next to nothing that merely living a good life can deliver by itself.its the Christian philosophy as stated by the founder.
why do humanists hate christianity then, do you suppose?
Jesus wasn't the founder of Christianity. He was the topic about of just another New World Order of Societal EvolutionNo hate. The message from the founder is fine. It’s just that the messengers are mostly assholes. And the churches themselves are nothing more than businesses delivering next to nothing that merely living a good life can deliver by itself.
that's all organized religions, humanists have a special boner for Christianity tho.No hate. The message from the founder is fine. It’s just that the messengers are mostly assholes. And the churches themselves are nothing more than businesses delivering next to nothing that merely living a good life can deliver by itself.
Nope. Your misguided attempts to get your hearsay classified as "history" failed miserably. By pretending that your religion is somehow more than a matter of faith, you diminish it and leave it falsified.The intellectual basis of Christianity is grounded in a historical event and a historical man.
Nope. We've been over this. There are no first-hand accounts. None. Jesus cannot be officially declared an historical person, but he can be believed to be an historical person by anyone and everyone, and that requires no evidence at all.You just have to decide whether the first century testimonial accounts are lies, fabrications, and mischaracterizations;
Simply believing that it all happened is enough. The moment you try to prove historicity, you falsify your entire faith. You die on your quest for the Holy Grail.or whether there is reliable testimony to support the historicity of the crucifixion and resurrection.