Right, which is what we want for the US.
Capitalist economies with degrees of socialism.
Bartender/ Actress the lie behind AOC
- Thread starter Wolverine
- Start date
Right, which is what we want for the US.
Capitalist economies with degrees of socialism.
I don't believe you, and there's no reason anyone should.
You haven't done that.
Instead what you've done is grow sloppy and reckless with your posts as you paint yourself into a rhetorical corner.
Then you just create new IDs that agree with yourself.
Totally insecure.
You opened this can of worms when you started with your multiple IDs.
the devil is in the details. New Green Deal is not a "degree of socialism" it's a complete remaking of our buildings,transportation, and energy industry.
It's 93 trillion over ten years -that is a not a "degree" it a complete work over
Actually, the map you gave me showed they did still control territory...that's when you retconned your argument to say "pockets of ISIS".
You shifted the goalposts several times there.
It was really funny.
BTW - what's the deal with the Syrian withdrawal? Oh right, that's not happening now.
the.. worms.. are..in..your..head..
2 is not "multiple" at most it is a couple -your words are as inexact as your economics .
You are obsessed and delusional.
Nice goalpost shift there...that makes, what, about a dozen on this subject?
And ISIS wasn't even defeated as a state with you admitting they still had pockets of control.
So you had to move the bar on what defines a state, and then you moved the bar on what defines ISIS.
LOL! Wow, dude. You could have just said that ISIS wasn't defeated and Trump was trying to distract from the failing economy at the time. But for some reason you are compelled to defend Trump...that's weird. Really weird.
Yeah, because you're making that argument.
You're arguing that had Venezuela used its petro-dollars to expand its energy infrastructure, it wouldn't have been hit hard by the decline in the global price of oil...the thing you are saying they should do more production of...which would lower the price per barrel...which would lower revenues...which would lower investment.
That's why you can't drill your way to higher energy prices and revenues.
Because global prices determine how much revenues Venezuela gets from selling their oil globally.
Wow.
You're not very bright.
The state of its infrastructure doesn't matter when it comes to selling the oil because the price per barrel is set globally by OPEC increasing or decreasing the global supply.
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
The worst thing Venezuela could do for itself right now is increase output and invest in oil infrastructure.
nope it showed "pockets of resistance" WITHIN others control -learn some terminology!
~~
you are wrong about world prices collapsing Venezuela oil
you are wrong about all things to do with terrorism
you are wrong about my IDs
your economics is suspect with your cherry picking - not a good track record at all.
You need to obsess less over my 2 IDs and study up on foreign affairs and counter-terrorism strategies
pockets of control means they are intersperced in cities ( down to the last one) but are not a viable fighting force -they just need to be mopped up
You don't understand ISIS and insurgencies -you seriously need more study time.
I suggested the Army War College online -that's where I went to -lots of pdf's that will enlighten you
... and BTW ... What's Wrong with Bartenders?
I'm going to see one tonight ... maybe two.
Do you now have something against Working People?
Interesting thing:
Back when I worked at the largest bartenders school in the world (in The City)...we graduated dozens of students every two weeks or so. There was a time when I knew...probably...200+ working bartenders in the Big Apple. They knew my name...how to greet me...and my drink. (At that time it was Johnny Black with a splash.)
200+ working bartenders throughout New York City!
OPEC countries don't unilaterally change the price.
An increase in production changes the price, and OPEC nations agree together to do that. One country cannot do it on their own if they are part of that cartel.
You are the one saying that Venezuela should increase its production by investing petro-dollars into the oil infrastructure. But doing so lowers the global price because you're increasing the supply, and OPEC wouldn't allow it anyway.
That is precisely what happened.
The global price per barrel dropped, and as a result, oil revenues for Venezuela also dropped.
Then the country was faced with their fiscal cliff because their primary source of revenue took a massive hit when oil prices declined. The same thing happened in Texas and Oklahoma in 2016.
You cannot drill your way out of lower oil prices.
Nope.
Wrong.
Because Venezuela is an OPEC nation, they do not unilaterally get to decide how much or how little production they will do.
They work in tandem with the rest of the cartel.
So what happens is that if production in Venezuela drops off, it is made up by increased production from other members of the cartel.
Increasing Venezuelan production means other countries in OPEC would have to reduce their production in order to maintain the global price.
We accommodated a remaking of our economy during the Industrial Revolution, so we can accommodate it now.
Already, more people work in green energy than fossil fuels.
No, it's not $93T over ten years.
And a lot of it is simply replacing one type of spending with another.
And we just gave the wealthy a $2T tax cut that you promised they would invest, but didn't.
So why are we even listening to you on this?
I don't believe you when you say you only have two, and there's nothing you can do to prove it.
Why the fuck should I -or anyone- take you at your word?
Which is another way of saying "pockets of territory".
So you just moving that bar....
No, you're the one wrong. After all, you're the one with instincts so poor, you chose to support Trump.
You just make shit up as you go and move the bar because ultimately, you know nothing.
No...I'm not. Sadly.
You have the worst judgment, so this is really hilarious to read.
You just make shit up as you go and hope that people don't see through you for the phony you are.
If they're not a viable fighting force, then why did Trump say we're keeping troops in Syria indefinitely after saying we were going to withdraw?
No, what's happening is that you have ever-changing definitions of both, that you shift depending on how your argument is faring, and then get screechy when I wholly reject your ad-hoc definitions and inventions and standards.
The truth is that you're just a propagandist, and you're not very good at your job.
Your strategy seems to be to spam the board with nonsense that you then have to walk back, while appealing to authority to carry your argument because you cannot do so yourself.