AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Actually the scary Pillow Guy has a platform called Frank Speech where *the principle* of free speech is celebrated and not stifled.
Think he will allow discussion on planning to kill the Pillow Guy on Frank Speech?

Actually the scary Pillow Guy has a platform called Frank Speech where *the principle* of free speech is celebrated and not stifled.

This isn't democracy.
This is what "elections" in Putin's Russia are like: allowing political partisans count the ballots.
Lying about a pandemic will get you banned
If he was telling people to drink bleach it would be the same
Not sure where you're getting this. False alarms, whether for a fire or a bomb, often categorized as felonies. "Free speech" will not work as a defense.
I am getting this from the Constitution of the United States and most State constitutions. Documents which you don't recognize.
Such 'laws' are unconstitutional.
He doesn't need to.No entrails needed. The facts are simple - Trump knows literally nothing about modern technology.
He relies on them all the time. He openly supports doing so.We also know that Trump is very reluctant to rely on experts.
Are you seriously suggesting Trump wrote his own software???Therefore, the more Trump is involved with a particular endeavor, the more policies he sets, the more he is involved in the day-to-day operations, the more likely it is to fail.
No need for that either. There are plenty of people capable of building a website and software that fully support Trump.Therefore, for Trump to start his own social media platform, he will either have A) to become extraordinarily savvy with both technology and social media. Or B) he'll have to recruit people who ARE savvy - but will occasionally have to tell Trump things that he doesn't want to hear.
This is bigotry, and a lie.The first requirement A) is so far outside the realm of possibility that I'm comfortable saying it's impossible. And B) is proven recipe for disaster, as evidenced by Trump's documented inability to work with subject matter experts like medical professionals, and military experts.
Are you saying that all laws should be done away with because of free speech?
???? Where the fuck do you get THAT reasoning????
Do they continued to be "unconstitutional" once they've been upheld by the Supreme Court? If so, what do you consider the "ultimate" litmus test of what is, and is not constitutional?I am getting this from the Constitution of the United States and most State constitutions. Documents which you don't recognize.
Such 'laws' are unconstitutional.
Maybe if youtube banned Tucker Carlson, it was because Carson was spreading disinformation.
The democrats spread false information every minute. All those asshat did was up his ratings. That is what really pisses them off.

The democrats spread false information every minute. All those asshat did was up his ratings. That is what really pisses them off.
From your quote: "Such 'laws' are unconstitutional."
Do they continued to be "unconstitutional" once they've been upheld by the Supreme Court? If so, what do you consider the "ultimate" litmus test of what is, and is not constitutional?
The Supreme Court has no authority to change the Constitution, or to interpret the Constitution, or to destroy the Constitution.
Only the owners of the Constitution, namely the States, have that authority.
The Supreme Court has no authority to change the Constitution, or to interpret the Constitution, or to destroy the Constitution.
Only the owners of the Constitution, namely the States, have that authority.
Maybe if youtube banned Tucker Carlson, it was because Carson was spreading disinformation.
I know that these so called vaccines ARE dangerous because i am told spiritually. Dont know which ones though.