Ballroom Derangement Syndrome Now Besets the Pathetic Left

Jarod said:
1. Not sure that is true, it looks like they usually do.
Click to expand...

You might try looking it up.

Jarod said:
2. Not a crime, still not ok w me. Is criminality now the bar for presidential behavior?
Click to expand...

Depends on what the meaning of "is"?

Jarod said:
3. The “list” is incomplete and likely a lie, and, why they donated (if they did) is my question. What are these corporations, with a fiduciary duty to stockholders, getting in exchange? Were they threatened or bullied?
Click to expand...

Speculation.
 
Yes, a nice trip to DC (now safe thanks to President Trump and the National Guard) when the beautiful new ballroom (built with zero taxpayer funds) is completed, would be nice.
 
Meanwhile, our great president, President Trump, is negotiating trade deals with China.

“Sec. Bessent: Us and China Have Framework for Deal.”
FOX Business
 
Earl said:
Have a child read post no. 270 and explain it to you.
Click to expand...
40 U.S.C. § 892 – Preservation of historic sites on the Capitol Grounds and White House

“The White House and its grounds shall be preserved as a historic park. No substantial alteration shall be made except with authorization by law.”
 
Damocles said:
1. Ask grok... They do not.
2. Do not care if it is "okay with you"...
3. You just saying stuff doesn't make it true.
Click to expand...
Took me less than 5 minutes…

40 U.S.C. § 892 – Preservation of historic sites on the Capitol Grounds and White House

“The White House and its grounds shall be preserved as a historic park. No substantial alteration shall be made except with authorization by law.”
 
Jarod said:
1) grok is not a citation, I know Obama did.
2) not my point.
3) and Trump saying stuff makes it less likely to be true.
Click to expand...
1. He did not. What Bush did was ask for funds what Obama did was spend those funds.
2. Still cannot care any less.
3. No, it really doesn't. You, or the leftist press, saying anything at all about Trump is suspect.
 
Damocles said:
1. He did not. What Bush did was ask for funds.
2. Still cannot care any less.
3. No, it really doesn't. You saying anything about Trump is suspect.
Click to expand...
Obama’s project did not destroy any portion of the White House, and was reversible.

40 U.S.C. § 892 – Preservation of historic sites on the Capitol Grounds and White House

“The White House and its grounds shall be preserved as a historic park. No substantial alteration shall be made except with authorization by law.”
 
Jarod said:
Took me less than 5 minutes…

40 U.S.C. § 892 – Preservation of historic sites on the Capitol Grounds and White House

“The White House and its grounds shall be preserved as a historic park. No substantial alteration shall be made except with authorization by law.”
Click to expand...
https://www.bbc.com › news › articles




3 days ago — The White House and several other buildings are exempt from the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966.

Why is the White House exempt?​

According to Section 107 of the act, three buildings and their grounds are exempt from the Section 106 review process: the White House, the US Capitol and the US Supreme Court building.
BBC
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top