Backup was denied, former Capitol Police chief says

You are a special kind of stupid, Anchovies.

It says that the command authority for the DC National Guard was delegated to Defense officials.

Authority to activate the District Guard has been delegated, by the president, to the Secretary of Defense and further delegated to the Secretary of the Army.

The delegation of authority was authorized in 1949 by Harry Truman.

Got it, so Trump doesn't have the call, rather his Defense officials do, the same Defense officials who Trump put into office a month ago right after the election when he fired his other set of Defense officials, they were the ones making the call, and Trump had nothing to do with it, you really that naïve?

And by the way, "D.C. Council issued this statement via Twitter on January 6: Today, the Department of Defense denied a request by Mayor Muriel Bowser to expand the responsibilities of the District of Columbia National Guard so that they would be authorized to protect and restore order at the Capitol Building. That request was denied." (https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/...guard/65-78800366-10c7-480b-af62-8773af4f29e0)

But Trump had no say or had anything to do with it
 
Which validates exactly what I noted, it needs the White House's approval to hit the bricks, or as you quoted, "the District Guard is subordinate solely to the president of the United States"

The Pentagon offered Sunday to send guardsmen to help secure the perimeter and the Justice Department offered FBI help on Wednesday as the mob arrived, according to The Associated Press. Both offers were rejected.

https://nypost.com/2021/01/07/capitol-police-nixed-fbi-national-guard-help-before-siege/

https://www.military.com/daily-news...jected-pentagon-offers-of-help-quell-mob.html


WASHINGTON (AP) — Three days before supporters of President Donald Trump rioted at the Capitol, the Pentagon asked the U.S Capitol Police if it needed National Guard manpower. And as the mob descended on the building Wednesday, Justice Department leaders reached out to offer up FBI agents. The police turned them down both times, according to senior defense officials and two people familiar with the matter.

https://apnews.com/article/capitol-police-reject-federal-help-9c39a4ddef0ab60a48828a07e4d03380

The Pentagon is in charge of the DC Guard offered to send help and they were turned down
 
WASHINGTON - Two days before Congress was set to formalize President-elect Joe Biden's victory, Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund was growing worried about the size of the pro-Trump crowds expected to stream into the District of Columbia in protest.

To be on the safe side, Sund asked House and Senate security officials for permission to request that the D.C. National Guard be placed on standby in case he needed quick backup.

But, Sund said Sunday, they turned him down.

https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/ne...denied-Capitol-Police-chief-says-15860394.php

So this could have been prevented !!!!

yes it could of but Pelosi and others like her wanted it to happen they need it
 
So it was "a top Army official" who refused to recommend National Guard assistance because "he didn't like the visual"?

Congratulations. My niece says you can read when you try. Kudos.

There are 2000 Capitol police. On a day like that they should all have been on duty. Obviously they weren't.

Who told you that?

As I said, this needs to be fully investigated. Questions need to be answered.

That's not all you said. This is what you said:

What should we infer from that? That the Capitol Police or Capitol security officials didn't want to keep the Trump mob out? Looks like we may get some interesting insights when this is fully investigated - as it will be.
 
Got it, so Trump doesn't have the call, rather his Defense officials do, the same Defense officials who Trump put into office a month ago right after the election when he fired his other set of Defense officials, they were the ones making the call, and Trump had nothing to do with it, you really that naïve?

Newsweek seems to differ with your supposition, Anchovies.

Exclusive: Officials Bypass Donald Trump

https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-officials-bypass-donald-trump-protect-dc-insurrection-after-capitol-riot-1559803
 
There were already NG in DC at Bowsers request (which was approved). She made the wrong call as usual: "On Monday and Tuesday of last week, Bowser requested 340 D.C. guard troops to help D.C. police prepare for Wednesday’s protests. The request prohibited guardsmen from receiving ammunition or riot gear (unless necessary for self-defense), sharing equipment with local law enforcement or using surveillance or air assets with explicit sign-off from the defense secretary, according to The Washington Post. There were also 40 personnel stationed at Joint Base Andrews if additional support was needed. That request was approved by the Pentagon and 255 D.C. guardsmen arrived in D.C. and began traffic management.

When an angry mob breached the Capitol Wednesday afternoon, Bowser and Capitol Police needed to file an additional request to the Army secretary in order to send in additional troops and to expand their responsibilities, because it was on federal property."

https://wamu.org/story/21/01/11/dc-national-guard-deployment-capitol-delay/
 
I googled it. You should try it some time.

Oddly, the opinion piece you cited doesn't verify your statement.

There are 2000 Capitol police. On a day like that they should all have been on duty. Obviously they weren't.

Why Nobody Protected the Capitol: The Capitol Police didn’t fail to prepare for an attack. It failed to imagine what kind of attack was coming.

he U.S. Capitol Police has 1,800 men and women dedicated to protecting the people’s citadel. Since September 11, their numbers have swelled, their procedures have changed, their perimeters have expanded, and their preparedness for a persistent threat has been plain. But they have been fighting an old battle. International terrorism is no longer the major threat they face, and arguably, it has not been for years.

What is happening today is the result of this failure of imagination. Security officials may claim the threat posed by a mob of white vigilantes was too far out of mental reach—it was something they could conceive of but not calibrate their plans for. But that’s an indictment, not an excuse. It’s a failure of the Capitol Police’s own leadership, and a failure of the Department of Homeland Security, to take right-wing radical agitation seriously. It is also a consequence of prejudice, although we should not be too hasty to make assumptions about the racial sociology of a security agency like the Capitol Police that has such a specialized mission.

To say that Congress was not prepared isn’t to suggest that no preparations were in place. In 2011 and 2017, when members of Congress were attacked by shooters, the constellations of agencies and officials who have some jurisdiction over congressional security—the Senate Sergeant-of-Arms, the Office of the Architect of the Capitol, the Metropolitan Police Department, and even the FBI—adjusted their procedures; more Capitol Police officers attended the “Personal Security Detail” course put on by the Secret Service at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center.

After 9/11, Congress established an alternate site at a local military base, a place where members could convene in the event that the Capitol was rendered inoperative. But that plan, which is highly classified, operates under the assumption that members are not trapped in place by thousands of people. Today they are. Congressional leadership can be evacuated through the Capitol if it has been reduced to a riot zone using tunnels that have been dug under the building. Those lead to newly hardened “hard rooms,” mini-bunkers that are scattered around the entire complex. We will soon know whether Congress made use of these contingencies.

But now what?

The D.C. National Guard has been mobilized and placed under control of the Department of Justice. Step one: Evacuate the members of Congress safely, using heavily armed people corridors to bring the representatives and senators to vehicles that will deposit them at safe harbor sites off campus. Step two: Begin a room-by-room clearing procedure, much like the police does when there’s a mass shooting, passing trespassers to arresting officers who will transfer them into a custodial detention area. Step three: Use K9s and technical surveillance technology to go inch-by-inch over the entire complex, clearing rooms of IEDs or surveillance devices in advance. Step four: start an after-action report.

Most Americans blinded themselves to the consequences of the president’s long-running incitement because we have allowed ourselves to ignore the direct links between his words and the actions of others. That’s easy for me to say, though: I’m a white man whose political affiliation would not be evident to people who might be looking to target others on the basis of race or gender or ethnicity. A large number of my Asian American friends in Los Angeles have been the victim of hate crimes in the wake of the president’s “China virus” jab. What happened today shocks them but does not surprise them.

After Congress certifies the election, members will go back home. And if we’ve learned a lesson from today, many of them will be targets. And it will be up to state and local officials to pick up the slack. Today, these agencies should make contact with their elected representatives and agree on a security plan for the near future. The permanent threat from right-wing revenge terrorism, incited by the president, made more virulent by the information ecosystem that his supporters drink from, and now actualized by a successful takeover of one of the most secure buildings in the world, is part of the Trump legacy—and America’s present.


https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/01/06/capitol-police-trump-mob-capitol/#:~:text=The%20U.S.%20Capitol%20Police%20has%201,800%20men%20and,But%20they%20have%20been%20fighting%20an%20old%20battle
 
Back
Top