Baby Powder Causes Cancer?

You claim to be a lawyer, if you knew about this, why didn't you bring suit?

Because I don't use the product

^ The truth ^

Despite Domer and Rune.
 
Yaya said:
Lawyers don't need standing to bring a suit, only their clients need standing.

I can't believe how dumb you are.
Click to expand...

He doesn't have standing to bring it for himself. He doesn't have any talc clients.

How much simpler does it get, you fucking retard?
 
domer76 said:
You fucking liar.

He said he hasn't brought suit because he hasn't used the product. It's called standing.

Why hasn't he used it or have cancer? Because he's a male and has no ovaries. He never said anything about the pain and suffering he never experienced. That's what YOU twisted it into.

Fucking illiterate moron.
Click to expand...

Boom
 
Stretch said:
There are a few companies making talc-free dusting powder now. Talc is easily substituted with cornstarch or kaolin clay or tapioca starch or bentonite clay or aloe vera powder. I make use of the last 4 for my homemade soap and body butter...guess I should start making my own dusting powder, too...a lot cheaper.

Here are some commercial talc-free brands out there:

Gold Bond Ultimate
Jack Black
Burt's Bees
Farmaesthetics
Nature's Baby Organics
Crabtree & Evelyn
Click to expand...

You are making a great case for liability. When something better and safer exists that's not good news for a defendant. It usually means they are selling something cheaper more dangerous and knew it.
 
Again for the eternally retarded:

You claim to be a lawyer, if you knew about this, why didn't you bring suit?

Because I don't use the product

A lawyer does not need to actually be harmed to bring a suit on behalf of their clients.

Dumber and Microdumber are idiots and one of them claims to be a lawyer.
 
Yaya said:
Did he mention the word standing? Was his post regarding standing?
Click to expand...

I already covered this, ignorant cretin. He said he has NEVER USED THE PRODUCT. He said HE HAS NO OVARIES. One has to be damaged to have standing.

You keep digging deeper, idiot. Stop while you're merely embarrassed.

Dense motherfucker.
 
Yaya said:
Again for the eternally retarded:

You claim to be a lawyer, if you knew about this, why didn't you bring suit?

Because I don't use the product

A lawyer does not need to actually be harmed to bring a suit on behalf of their clients.

Dumber and Microdumber are idiots and one of them claims to be a lawyer.
Click to expand...

He said he HAD NO TALC CLIENTS to sue on their behalf.

Look out Granule. You're being challenged for the #1 Forum Dumbfuck.

Congrats, Special Olympian, I didn't think that was possible.
 
domer76 said:
He said he HAD NO TALC CLIENTS to sue on their behalf.

Look out Granule. You're being challenged for the #1 Forum Dumbfuck.

Congrats, Special Olympian, I didn't think that was possible.
Click to expand...

He said "CLIENTS"? Really?

Because I don't use the product

How stupid can you get?
 
Micawber said:
Gee, a verdict came out. How long then do you think that this has been known? I have known 4evr. Stop using it.

If you want your finger on the pulse like me, subscribe to classaction360. :cool:
Click to expand...
We would expect an ambulance chaser like you to know, it's just work for you!

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Micawber said:
I disagree. That percentage increase in ovarian cancer is yuge. It requires a warning at a minimum, perhaps even a recall. All the lawsuits of this nature couple a failure to warn with a defective product unreasonably dangerous allegation. Basically, its class action PI tort stuff, but the warning deficiency sounds more in contract. Massive bucks DB plus grievous harm to thousands equals Kaching, and a just resolution. In addition it will save countless lives in the future. They will go back to the drawing board and make a safer product. It's how the system works, and it's a good one.
Click to expand...
Yep it certainly works for your fellow ambulance chasers. Only in America would you need to put warnings on cups of coffee that the contents are hot.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Micawber said:
You are making a great case for liability. When something better and safer exists that's not good news for a defendant. It usually means they are selling something cheaper more dangerous and knew it.
Click to expand...
Sometimes. Sometimes, it's just a way to take advantage of a crazed public. Tylenol suffered greatly after some idiot tainted a handful of packages. In the 90's it was alar in apple juice.
 
domer76 said:
He said he HAD NO TALC CLIENTS to sue on their behalf.

Look out Granule. You're being challenged for the #1 Forum Dumbfuck.

Congrats, Special Olympian, I didn't think that was possible.
Click to expand...
Yurt is a lawyer, he may be a lot of things but he knows his shit when it comes to the law.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top