Baby killers are mad at Doritos!

patriot66 said:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...rasound-super-bowl-ad-for-humanizing-fetuses/

So comical that they are upset for an ultrasound showing what a human being looks like right before birth, a human being!
Click to expand...

They must be the same people I encountered on a difference discussion forum. They have since day 1 proclaimed that an unborn baby, something they call a clump of cells, fetus, etc. has no rights until it is born and becomes a human being. Recently, on one particular forum, a thread was posted entitled "Is healthcare a right?". In true form of their hypocritical kind, they argued in favor of it being a right and included support for prenatal coverage as part of that right. I found it interesting that something, the unborn baby, they said didn't have rights suddenly had a right to healthcare. When they were asked, most tried to twist their own words from previous posts using the "it's different" mantra. Nothing like catching Liberals in lies and exposing them.
 
I thought it was the funniest commercial of the night. It had me laughing out loud along with the rest of my family. Obviously a baby can't see doritos from inside the womb and wouldnt do what it did in a real doctors office, but that aside I'm not sure why people would be so upset about a sonogram showing what a baby in the womb looks like and how they do move and interact, doritos aside. I wonder if you were to ask 10 pregnant hard core pro-choice activists that got pregnant in order to start a family what is inside of their body from the moment they learn they are pregnant until they give birth if they would refer to what is inside of them as a baby or not. I would bet that 9 out of 10, maybe even all 10, would call it their "baby" the entire time, but if the pregnancy was an accident would they call it something else??? In both cases, in my personal opinion, it's a baby every time.
 
Cowgirl Tuff said:
I thought it was the funniest commercial of the night. It had me laughing out loud along with the rest of my family. Obviously a baby can't see doritos from inside the womb and wouldnt do what it did in a real doctors office, but that aside I'm not sure why people would be so upset about a sonogram showing what a baby in the womb looks like and how they do move and interact, doritos aside. I wonder if you were to ask 10 pregnant hard core pro-choice activists that got pregnant in order to start a family what is inside of their body from the moment they learn they are pregnant until they give birth if they would refer to what is inside of them as a baby or not. I would bet that 9 out of 10, maybe even all 10, would call it their "baby" the entire time, but if the pregnancy was an accident would they call it something else??? In both cases, in my personal opinion, it's a baby every time.
Click to expand...

You are very wise. They don't call them fetus showers
 
its a stupid commercial


Its design is to sell some worthless crap to some one who likes to eat crap


you cons are insane
 
evince said:
its a stupid commercial


Its design is to sell some worthless crap to some one who likes to eat crap


you cons are insane
Click to expand...

So you ASSume someone that thought the commercial was a good one means they eat what the commercial advertised? Typical stupid Liberal. I thought the Prius commercial was good but wouldn't buy a piece of shit car like that. So much for you having logical thoughts.
 
I Love America said:
You are very wise. They don't call them fetus showers
Click to expand...

Something else along those lines that's interesting and shows the contradictory/hypocritical view of Liberals. They will tell you that an unborn baby doesn't have rights until it is born. However, if you ask them whether or not healthcare is a right, they will say yes and that prenatal care should be a part of the right to healthcare. My question to them is how can something they consider as not having rights have a right to healthcare before it's born. NONE have been able to provide anything but deflection.
 
It is truly comical that NARAL and others are upset by this commercial. Their problem is they can't claim the 'fetus' in the ultrasound was fake... it was an actual ultrasound of the director of the commercials kid (who is now 9 months old). The idiots want to pretend, like Desh, that the unborn child isn't human. They even tweeted that their anger was because Doritos was trying to 'humanize' the 'fetus'. unfortunately science already dictates the unborn prodigy of two humans is indeed... HUMAN.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top