asylum seekers to be sent back to Mexico for duration of immigration proceedings

Fentoine Lum said:
Same place it says the only nation ever to use nuclear WMDs on civilian populations will be the arbiter of who is allowed to have nuclear weaponry, the same place it says we are entitled to occupy the planet militarily and subject the world to endless militarist occupation and warring for profit and access to the resources of others.

Perhaps if we pull off another coup in Honduras it would help with our immigration hysteria.
Click to expand...

In other words, it doesn't.
 
anatta said:
thy are legally entitled to apply -thee is no legal basis that says they have to be 'in country'
while they wait for a hearing
Click to expand...

Read the law you dumb fucking asswipe. You cannot even apply for asylum in an American embassy.

https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum/obtaining-asylum-united-states

Obtaining Asylum in the United States

The two ways of obtaining asylum in the United States are through the affirmative process and defensive process.
Affirmative Asylum Processing With USCIS

To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum status regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status.
 
Old Trapper said:
Read the law you dumb fucking asswipe. You cannot even apply for asylum in an American embassy.

https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum/obtaining-asylum-united-states

Obtaining Asylum in the United States

The two ways of obtaining asylum in the United States are through the affirmative process and defensive process.
Affirmative Asylum Processing With USCIS

To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum status regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status.
Click to expand...
moronic deflection.

They ARE being allowed to apply at the border ( in the USA) . THEN they WAIT for a HEARING..get it??
how much longer are you going to grasp at this stupidity?

anatta said:
thy are legally entitled to apply -thee is no legal basis that says they have to be 'in country'
while they wait for a hearing
Click to expand...
 
anatta said:
writing in loud red letters just makes you more stupid.

The requirement is they: ( and these are DHS policies derived from legislation -nothing to do with the Constitution)
1. are allowed to apply for asylum:

in no way is this fettered. They still get to apply whether they get caught illegal crossing
They still get to apply at ports of entry. there is no requirement they be in country to apply otherwise.

2. They are do due process:
Meaning they have to get a immigration hearing. whether they hold them here ( about 180k already in holding)
or held in Mexico isn't any different, so long as they get a hearing.

the difference is that by holding them in Mexico, it means we don't have to hold them here
or catch and release when we are fill up.

They get medicine/food and snuggy blankets in Mexico -same as here
Click to expand...

Basically you are saying fuck the law, fuck the Constitution, Trump says it is so, and I like sucking his **** so I will agree to it.

BTW, Mexico says they can't afford it.
 
anatta said:
moronic deflection.

They ARE being allowed to apply at the border ( in the USA) . THEN they WAIT for a HEARING..get it??
how much longer are you going to grasp at this stupidity?
Click to expand...

You really are one stupid fucking bitch. So, they come to the gate, get a fucking n=umber printed on their arm, and then go back to Mexico and wait? Do you know the meaning of the word "through"

Not what the law says ass, just what your girlie man wants.
 
Old Trapper said:
Read the law you dumb fucking asswipe. You cannot even apply for asylum in an American embassy.

https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum/obtaining-asylum-united-states

Obtaining Asylum in the United States

The two ways of obtaining asylum in the United States are through the affirmative process and defensive process.
Affirmative Asylum Processing With USCIS

To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum status regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status.
Click to expand...

I'm not convinced the law matters in america, it seems to resolve nothing at all.
 
[h=1]Trump's immigration policies would have stopped Jesus himself from fleeing.[/h]

Source: Vice News


Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez charged that the Trump administration’s immigration policies were plainly unchristian and would have blocked Jesus Christ and his family from fleeing to safety in Egypt.

The congressman from Illinois slammed Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen as she testified Thursday before the House Judiciary Committee, where she announced that asylum seekers would no longer be able to wait in the U.S. while their claims of persecution proceed through the U.S. court system. Instead, they’d have to wait their turn in Mexico instead, potentially for years, in a dramatic deviation from previous U.S. immigration policy.

But some of what Democrats see as the Trump administration’s past indiscretions on immigration policy also came up — like its now-defunct “zero tolerance policy,” which effectively separated undocumented migrant children from their families at the border.

“Just in time for the holidays, the remorseless secretary,” Gutierrez said, as he accused Nielsen of lying after she tweeted that the administration didn’t have a policy of separating any children.

More at: https://news.vice.com/en_us/article...f-from-fleeing-democratic-representative-says
 
Bourbon said:
[h=1]Trump's immigration policies would have stopped Jesus himself from fleeing.[/h]

Source: Vice News


Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez charged that the Trump administration’s immigration policies were plainly unchristian and would have blocked Jesus Christ and his family from fleeing to safety in Egypt.

The congressman from Illinois slammed Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen as she testified Thursday before the House Judiciary Committee, where she announced that asylum seekers would no longer be able to wait in the U.S. while their claims of persecution proceed through the U.S. court system. Instead, they’d have to wait their turn in Mexico instead, potentially for years, in a dramatic deviation from previous U.S. immigration policy.

But some of what Democrats see as the Trump administration’s past indiscretions on immigration policy also came up — like its now-defunct “zero tolerance policy,” which effectively separated undocumented migrant children from their families at the border.

“Just in time for the holidays, the remorseless secretary,” Gutierrez said, as he accused Nielsen of lying after she tweeted that the administration didn’t have a policy of separating any children.

More at: https://news.vice.com/en_us/article...f-from-fleeing-democratic-representative-says
Click to expand...

When asked Nielsen could not even answer as to how many had died in American custody.
 
Bourbon said:
[h=1]Trump's immigration policies would have stopped Jesus himself from fleeing.[/h]

Source: Vice News


Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez charged that the Trump administration’s immigration policies were plainly unchristian and would have blocked Jesus Christ and his family from fleeing to safety in Egypt.

The congressman from Illinois slammed Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen as she testified Thursday before the House Judiciary Committee, where she announced that asylum seekers would no longer be able to wait in the U.S. while their claims of persecution proceed through the U.S. court system. Instead, they’d have to wait their turn in Mexico instead, potentially for years, in a dramatic deviation from previous U.S. immigration policy.

But some of what Democrats see as the Trump administration’s past indiscretions on immigration policy also came up — like its now-defunct “zero tolerance policy,” which effectively separated undocumented migrant children from their families at the border.

“Just in time for the holidays, the remorseless secretary,” Gutierrez said, as he accused Nielsen of lying after she tweeted that the administration didn’t have a policy of separating any children.

More at: https://news.vice.com/en_us/article...f-from-fleeing-democratic-representative-says
Click to expand...

Were Trump's immigration policies in place in Egypt at that time?

Someone should explain to the wetback that he's not supposed to include anything related to religion in his support for something.
 
Old Fapper said:
:fap:
Click to expand...

Read the Immigration and Nationality Act lately, mature masturbator?

Effective immediately, the United States will begin the process of invoking Section 235(b)(2)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Under the Migration Protection Protocols (MPP), individuals arriving in or entering the United States from Mexico—illegally or without proper documentation—may be returned to Mexico for the duration of their immigration proceedings.

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/12/20/secretary-nielsen-announces-historic-action-confront-illegal-immigration
 
CFM said:
If some illegal trying to come in here without permission dies in custody, who gives a shit.
Click to expand...

Not I. I suspect the mature masturbator (AKA Old Fapper) doesn't care, either.

I don't recall seeing any protests from him when illegals died on Obama's watch during the DEMOCRAT Reign of Error.

United States government records summarizing investigations of the deaths of 18 migrants in the custody of US immigration authorities support a conclusion that subpar care contributed to at least seven of the deaths, Human Rights Watch said today.

The death reviews, from mid-2012 to mid-2015, reveal substandard medical care and violations of applicable detention standards. Two independent medical experts consulted by Human Rights Watch concluded that these failures probably contributed to the deaths of 7 of the 18 detainees, while potentially putting many other detainees in danger as well. The records also show evidence of the misuse of isolation for people with mental disabilities, inadequate mental health evaluation and treatment, and broader medical care failures.

“In 2009, the Obama administration promised major immigration detention reforms, including more centralized oversight and improved health care,” said Clara Long, US researcher at Human Rights Watch. “But these death reviews show that system-wide problems remain, including a failure to prevent or fix substandard medical care that literally kills people.”


https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/07/07/us-deaths-immigration-detention#
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top