Assad pounds rebels, Obama impotent

Capgras said:
i personally am not anti-war.

I believe america has a right to defend itself when there is a threat against it.

I don't think syria meets that standard

and I am sick of people of paying no mind to the inevitable blowback of taking a particular side in a middle eastern civil war.
Click to expand...

More proof that you are a fake libertarian.

Of course, we have a right to defend ourselves. No one is against that, idiot.
 
evince said:
This is what fucking stupid dishonest people do.


Its why you back the cheating your party does like its some honorable thing to do.

You have no morals and cant tell the truth from one minute to the next.


Its why you back wars depending on wether these an R in back of the presidents name.

Its why you party is dying


stupid is as stupid does.

do you ever tire of being stupid liars?
Click to expand...

Here you go, sugar tits:
NB0004_crying_towel__58508.1356419937.1280.1280.jpg
 
Capgras said:
i personally am not anti-war.

I believe america has a right to defend itself when there is a threat against it.

I don't think syria meets that standard

and I am sick of people of paying no mind to the inevitable blowback of taking a particular side in a middle eastern civil war.
Click to expand...

Thanks .. I appreciate your thoughts brother.

The blowback from an attack on Syria would be huge in costs, including the impact to this already fragile economy.
 
To bomb or not to bomb? Obama’s threat is butt of Syrian jokes...


http://english.alarabiya.net/en/perspective/features/2013/09/10/Obama-strike-threat-is-butt-of-syrian-jokes.html
 
wow are you fucking stupid.


the Un said it all points to assad even though they were not tasked with it.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
???.....no they didn't.....all they said was that it was Sarin gas......link me to a UN statement that anything "points to Assad".....
Click to expand...

There have been lots of insinuations from propagandists working from within the UN but nothing that will be really condemning of the Assad regime for the rest of the world yet. And in fact, Del Ponte has provided the most damning evidence of all UN representatives and she's still on the side of the terrorists being the guilty side.

That can't be ignored and indeed could be the reason the decision was made to not condemn either side officially. The US knows there will be plenty of propaganda outside the UN report to condemn Assad.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
???.....no they didn't.....all they said was that it was Sarin gas......link me to a UN statement that anything "points to Assad".....
Click to expand...

The ignorance is strong with Evince; it is colored by the hyper partisan blinders she wears and the massive amounts of leftist kool-aid she swills.
 
Rana said:
We didn't drop one bomb and put a kink in their nuclear program.
Click to expand...

I am amsued that brain dead supporters of Obummer think that we put a kink in Syria's nuclear program; I thought we were talking about poison gas here?

But it is equally mind numbing that brain dead supporters of Obummer think that he put a kink in Assad's WMD program when NOTHING has been finalized or done to date.

It is obvious that brain dead supporters of Obummer are dumber than a rock.
 
If Obama succeeds then it certainly would give the Iranians the initiative to work with the US. The fact that Russia is a big part of this could give them a feeling of being protected from US aggression. And of course that's their biggest concern by far.

The Obama/Putin initiative has huge potential at least. Unfortunately, it's easy to see that it flies in the face of US foreign policy which has already named Syria as a victim.
 
Desh desperately needs to pretend O-BOMB-YA wanst to "the right thing", so she concocts a web of lies in her dream world.

No sale, Desh.

Show proof that the Assad regime used gas, not the rebels O-BOMB-YA supports.

BTW, it's still none of our business.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top