Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
the cop could see no weapon in her hands..so u are saying its OK to open fire when a cops sees that no weapons are in the hands
The mob was the weapon, dumbass.
the cop could see no weapon in her hands..so u are saying its OK to open fire when a cops sees that no weapons are in the hands
Cool..from now on cops can kill anyone because they may be a meth fueled
The mob was the weapon, dumbass.
Dear fucking Neo-Nazi; people walking past a house is not mob attacking said house. Had the mob attacked the house then, yes, they had a right of defense.Same could be said about the McCloskeys ..all they did was point a gun at a mob while standing on their own land
Yet the McCloskey's didn't have reasonable cause to just banish firearms amid protesters on their property?
Dear fucking Neo-Nazi; people walking past a house is not mob attacking said house. Had the mob attacked the house then, yes, they had a right of defense.
That said, Kyle Rittenhouse proved that it's legal to shoot unarmed people if they are threatening you. If someone had shot Patricia McCloskey through the chest for threatening unarmed Americans, would you have supported the right of self-defense or just bitched and whined about African-American killers?
![]()
Kyle was being attacked u stupid fuck
And Ashli was unarmed
More proof you're limp-dicked neo-Nazi fuckwad; you never answer questions but always ask them.If any of the BLM protestors had been doing this to Mark McCloskey would he have the right to shoot?
View attachment 23212
. If someone had shot Patricia McCloskey through the chest for threatening unarmed Americans, would you have supported the right of self-defense or just bitched and whined about African-American killers?
![]()
More proof you're limp-dicked neo-Nazi fuckwad; you never answer questions but always ask them.
Every human being has an unalienable right of self-defense. The answer is yes. Why do you specify only shooting black people, Nazi?
If someone was attacking anyone, do they have a right of self-defense? Yes, they do, regardless of skin-tone or politics...not that fucking Nazis and WSE cocksuckers would agree.
Do you agree that people had a right to shoot Patricia McCloskey in self-defense? Yes or no, please. No fucking pussified quibbling bullshit.
![]()
NOPE!
Patricia McCloskey was not attacking anyone!
Awesome. Next time you see a cop go past your trailer, pull out your Luger and point it at them. Let me know what happens.![]()
Patricia McCloskey was not attacking anyone! She was defending her land etc
From what? People, even those you dislike, have a right of transit on public streets and sidewalks.
You should know that you are continuing to prove yourself to be less-than-bright and less-than-rational. It's a trait common to neo-Nazis.
It's also one of the reasons why the WSEs always rank neo-Nazis on the bottom tier. WSE leadership slang for neo-Nazis is "cannon fodder".
Do you understand this term, volsrock? Or is this another question that is too hard for you to answer with a yes or a no?
Exactly, what are you saying?????
From what? People, even those you dislike, have a right of transit on public streets and sidewalks.
You should know that you are continuing to prove yourself to be less-than-bright and less-than-rational. It's a trait common to neo-Nazis.
It's also one of the reasons why the WSEs always rank neo-Nazis on the bottom tier. WSE leadership slang for neo-Nazis is "cannon fodder".
Do you understand this term, volsrock? Or is this another question that is too hard for you to answer with a yes or a no?
No shit. I'd ask you to prove why that's true but since you continue failing to answer questions honestly, if at all, I won't.If cop is tresspassing (breaking the law) with a screaming mob and I am on my own land I have every right to point a gun

Ashlii Babbitt topic. Nothing but diversion.
Just as I indicated. No reasonable conversation….