As promised, Deep Scientific Analysis of Most Frequent Current Events Thread Starters

[canceled.2021.1]

Perhaps you ought to take account of the number of views as well.

Very good point. Another is that just because there are lots of responses doesn't mean the OP in and of itself is interesting. How do you account for the numerous threads that inevitably veer off topic into a verbal MMA? When Bitchou and PPM go at each other on a particular thread does that mean the thread itself is of interest to a broad set of observers?

As I said, how do you control for bias?

 

[Rationalist]

science? really?

Yeah, we know it's something you fundies have a difficult time with...

 

[cancel2 2022]

Yeah, we know it's something you fundies have a difficult time with...

It's more of an egofest for Grind and his histograms.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Yeah, we know it's something you fundies have a difficult time with...

I am a man of science and when I see it, I applaud it. This was science? OK smarty pants, what was the null hypothesis?

 

[Rationalist]

I am a man of science and when I see it, I applaud it. This was science? OK smarty pants, what was the null hypothesis?

I was joking. I didn't even read the thread.

That said, I tend to doubt your claim to be "a man of science." Unless you completely buck the trend amongst southern conservative Christians, that is...

 

[canceled.2021.1]

I was joking. I didn't even read the thread.

That said, I tend to doubt your claim to be "a man of science." Unless you completely buck the trend amongst southern conservative Christians, that is...

then maybe you should rethink your Carl Sagan quote. It would appear that you have a bias that anyone who is a southern conservative christian cannot believe in science. Now, if we want to further delve into the scientific method in this thread, we could start with the title and then follow up with its first statement as the two are incongruent. But, hey what the fuck do I know. I am a southern conservative Christian

 

[Howey]

Jack was a man of science. Locke was a man of faith.

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

just curious as to how you excluded bias from your "scientific" analysis

there is zero bias.

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

Perhaps you ought to take account of the number of views as well.

views are too hard to interpret. one could have a lot of views, but it might be people going "ugh, this thread is stupid"

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

I am a man of science and when I see it, I applaud it. This was science? OK smarty pants, what was the null hypothesis?

my null hypothesis was, i bet i don't get polling data.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Then by definition it isn't science. Or you don't understand science. There is always bias in science. Maybe you don't understand the term bias as it relates to science?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

views are too hard to interpret. one could have a lot of views, but it might be people going "ugh, this thread is stupid"

How did you control for the replies that we're just bitch fights and off topic?

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

Then by definition it isn't science. Or you don't understand science. There is always bias in science. Maybe you don't understand the term bias as it relates to science?

nope, my science has zero bias. it's very advanced.

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

How did you control for the replies that we're just bitch fights and off topic?

bitch fights are still interesting, or they wouldn't happen. Drama and long threads is always the best. If there are replies, they always 100% gauge the readers interest.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

nope, my science has zero bias. it's very advanced.

 

[Airstrip One]

I am a man of science and when I see it, I applaud it. This was science? OK smarty pants, what was the null hypothesis?

What was the hypothesis?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

What was the hypothesis?

The null hypothesis should have been something along the lines of "the wonderful FactsRStubborn posts new threads infrequently"

 

[cancel2 2022]

views are too hard to interpret. one could have a lot of views, but it might be people going "ugh, this thread is stupid"

You mean as opposed to writing 'this thread is stupid' or words to that effect!!

 

[Mott the Hoople]

there is zero bias.

There's always bias, you just didn't calculate it you lazy bastard.

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

There's always bias, you just didn't calculate it you lazy bastard.

no mott, you are wrong. my results are 100% bias free. Sorry, but you aren't as good at this type of stuff as I am. I would know more than you.