Arrest Obama
Another Great American Real News Links Brief
While Joe Biden and the Biden Crime Family are certainly criminals, it is Obama who was the mastermind behind to worst crimes against Donald Trump and America
open.substack.com
I remember when President Trump was first elected in 2016. When Trump finally entered the White House, Rush Limbaugh noted that unlike all previous presidents, Obama’s team was not leaving town. He speculated that Obama’s team was going to remain in Washington DC to run a shadow government, a “Resistance” if you will. Rush Limbaugh was more correct than he knew. While Joe Biden and the Biden Crime Family are certainly criminals, it is Obama who was the mastermind behind to worst crimes against Donald Trump and America.
The case for arresting former President Barack Obama hinges in part on allegations made by Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard. She asserts that Obama and senior officials in his administration engaged in a "treasonous conspiracy" to undermine President Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory by manufacturing and politicizing intelligence to create the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. This comes as no surprise to people who watch real news outlets, as opposed to fake news outlets like CNN and NBC who did nothing but cover for Obama’s and Biden’s lies and crimes for 12 years.
Below is a structured argument for arresting Obama:
1. Treasonous Conspiracy to Subvert the 2016 Election:
Declassified documents released on July 18, 2025, provide "overwhelming evidence" that Obama and his national security team deliberately manipulated intelligence to falsely suggest Russian interference in the 2016 election to benefit Trump. This narrative, referred to as the "Russia Hoax," has been a deliberate attempt to delegitimize Trump’s presidency and subvert the will of the American people.
Tulsi Gabbard claims that Obama directed this conspiracy, with key figures such as former DNI James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey, and former National Security Adviser Susan Rice implicated in manufacturing intelligence, including the use of the Steele dossier, which was known to be unreliable.
2. Manipulation of Intelligence Assessments:
Sources cite documents showing that prior to the 2016 election, the Intelligence Community (IC) assessed that Russia was "probably not trying" to influence the election through cyber means. However, after Trump’s victory, Obama’s administration allegedly suppressed a Presidential Daily Briefing (PDB) from December 8, 2016, which stated that Russian actors "did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure." Instead, a new narrative was pushed, claiming Russian interference to help Trump.
Tulsi Gabbard states that this shift was politically motivated, contradicting earlier IC findings and using fabricated intelligence to fuel the Trump-Russia collusion probe, which she describes as a "years-long coup" against Trump.
3. Legal Grounds for Arrest:
The actions of Obama and his team constitute a "treasonous conspiracy," a serious charge under U.S. law. Treason, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2381, involves levying war against the United States or providing aid and comfort to its enemies. By subverting a duly elected president’s mandate through fabricated intelligence undermines the democratic republic, which Gabbard equates to a betrayal of the American, Obama aided our foreign enemies.
She has referred the documents to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for criminal investigation, suggesting potential charges against Obama and others for abuse of power, politicization of intelligence, and actions that threatened the integrity of the democratic process.
4. Impact on Trump’s Presidency and Public Trust:
The Russia Hoax led to significant consequences, including two fake, trumped up congressional impeachments of Trump which were clearly not grounded in facts, reputational harm to figures like Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, and heightened tensions with Russia. These outcomes are presented as evidence of a deliberate effort to destabilize Trump’s presidency and erode public trust in the democratic system.
Accountability is critical to restore faith in the democratic republic, arguing that prosecuting Obama and his team is necessary to prevent future abuses of power.
Conclusion
The case for arresting Obama rests on the clear and obvious treasonous conspiracy to undermine Trump’s 2016 victory through manufactured intelligence. There was a deliberate effort to subvert democracy, with evidence purportedly showing inconsistencies in pre- and post-election intelligence assessments. While it is true that the legal threshold for treason is high, the facts advocate for DOJ action. Critics argue the narrative serves as a distraction from other Trump administration issues, highlighting the need for cautious scrutiny of such claims. These are the same critics who tried to throw Trump in jail for the last four years by making up fake crimes and weaponizing corrupt judges and corrupt D.A’s.
The Democrat Party has long been a criminal organization in reality. Chopping off it’s head would be a good beginning to finally eradicating its poison from American politics.
