PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
DNC had that covered.......
Army of Russian trolls reportedly targeted swing states with anti-Clinton fake news
- Thread starter christiefan915
- Start date
DNC had that covered.......
cawacko
Well-known member
El Oh El, besides the fact that I hate Russia (funny, how pissed were you in the '80's when Reagan called them the Evil Empire?) you never remember what you post. You have absolutely zero core set of beliefs. Your belief system is whatever a Democrat does.
Now carry on and keep us all on the edge of our seat for that one day a 60 year old woman can say an actual sentence without swearing.
There you have it, folks.
Trumptards giggling it up about their support for Russian KGB-FSB interference in American elections.
It is almost certain that if one time traveled back a few months, these same Trumptards were denying that KGB-FSB had interferred in an American election to help their preferred candidate: Donald J. Drumpf.
I do not think it takes a psychologist, or even an observant person to say this: Anyone who is constantly moving the goal posts, constantly changing their stories a full 180 degrees, is a person that lacks integrity; a person who is both dishonest and a who is a propagandist.
Possibly even a person who worships every day at the shrine they built to Drumpf in their house.
Last edited:
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Wait a minute.
Are you saying Trump was right after all, when he said the election was rigged lol? Didn't you guys have a hissy when he said that?
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
I need a scoreboard update:
Were these Russian trolls civilians (men with vodka), or were they state actors (men with AK-47)?
Were these Russian trolls civilians (men with vodka), or were they state actors (men with AK-47)?
Callinectes
Proud MAGA Semi-Facist
What lies were told about HRC in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, that I did not hear in Florida?
your desperation to show that the MSM wasn't in the tank for Clinton does NOT equal "support for Russian trolls".
( nor are these KGB-FSB -these are garden variety paid for trolls )
The NYTimes practiced "advocacy journalism" during the campaign to favor Clinton, and disfavor Trump.
The NYTimes has said as much....WTF is "advocacy journalism but biased journalism??
the rest of your crp regarding "moving the goal posts" and "shrines" is a pathetic editorializing without merit-
screed- which I am not about to engage. it's ad homs.
Once again you are lacking in understanding of issues.
Once again you demonstrate a slavish desire to smear Trump voters at the expense of truth
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
After reading everyone's comments; it has become clear that there still is nothing, regarding Russia, except for conjecture, assertions, assumptions, hopes, and dreams from the liberals.
In this day of 24 hour newscasts, the internet, discussion boards, etc; liberals are still trying to find a place to place blame for Hillary losing, except on Hillary and themselves.
In their world, words like "may have" have been changed to mean "fact".
In this day of 24 hour newscasts, the internet, discussion boards, etc; liberals are still trying to find a place to place blame for Hillary losing, except on Hillary and themselves.
In their world, words like "may have" have been changed to mean "fact".
It's true I don't understand why some people don't like her. But that's a completely different topic from having her targeted by Russian trolls while trump skated.
NYT openly advocates abandoning objectivity in reporting on Trump
https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2016/08/16/nyt-blames-trump-for-journalists-biased-reporting/
the MSM have outdone even themselves in their coverage of the 2016 presidential election by abandoning all pretenses at being objective. See, for example:
CNN anchor Chris Cuomo admits media are Hillary Clinton’s bitch
Blatant media bias: MSNBC’s Joy Reid is a whore for Hillary
News media are big donors to Hillary’s corrupt Clinton Foundation
Never investigating Obama, Washington Post unleashes army of 20 to probe ‘every facet’ of Trump’s life
Now, the New York Times (NYT), the premier national U.S. newspaper, not openly admits their abandonment of objective journalism in their coverage of Donald Trump, in an act of unbridled chutzpah, they actually blame Trump for it, arguing that objective coverage only benefits his campaign by providing him with free publicity.
f you’re a working journalist and you believe that Donald J. Trump is a demagogue playing to the nation’s worst racist and nationalistic tendencies [Note how Rutenberg equates racism with nationalism or love of one’s nation ~Eowyn], that he cozies up to anti-American dictators and that he would be dangerous with control of the United States nuclear codes, how the heck are you supposed to cover him?
Because if you believe all of those things, you have to throw out the textbook American journalism has been using for the better part of the past half-century, if not longer, and approach it in a way you’ve never approached anything in your career. If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that. You would move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional. That’s uncomfortable and uncharted territory for every mainstream, nonopinion journalist I’ve ever known, and by normal standards, untenable.
But the question that everyone is grappling with is: Do normal standards apply? And if they don’t, what should take their place? […]
may not always seem fair to Mr. Trump or his supporters. But journalism shouldn’t measure itself against any one campaign’s definition of fairness. It is journalism’s job to be true to the readers and viewers, and true to the facts, in a way that will stand up to history’s judgment. To do anything less would be untenable.
In other words, it’s Donald Trump’s fault: He’s crazy, and so journalists shouldn’t be fair in their reporting because their more important job is to prevent someone crazy like him to become President.
https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2016/08/16/nyt-blames-trump-for-journalists-biased-reporting/
the MSM have outdone even themselves in their coverage of the 2016 presidential election by abandoning all pretenses at being objective. See, for example:
CNN anchor Chris Cuomo admits media are Hillary Clinton’s bitch
Blatant media bias: MSNBC’s Joy Reid is a whore for Hillary
News media are big donors to Hillary’s corrupt Clinton Foundation
Never investigating Obama, Washington Post unleashes army of 20 to probe ‘every facet’ of Trump’s life
Now, the New York Times (NYT), the premier national U.S. newspaper, not openly admits their abandonment of objective journalism in their coverage of Donald Trump, in an act of unbridled chutzpah, they actually blame Trump for it, arguing that objective coverage only benefits his campaign by providing him with free publicity.
f you’re a working journalist and you believe that Donald J. Trump is a demagogue playing to the nation’s worst racist and nationalistic tendencies [Note how Rutenberg equates racism with nationalism or love of one’s nation ~Eowyn], that he cozies up to anti-American dictators and that he would be dangerous with control of the United States nuclear codes, how the heck are you supposed to cover him?
Because if you believe all of those things, you have to throw out the textbook American journalism has been using for the better part of the past half-century, if not longer, and approach it in a way you’ve never approached anything in your career. If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that. You would move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional. That’s uncomfortable and uncharted territory for every mainstream, nonopinion journalist I’ve ever known, and by normal standards, untenable.
But the question that everyone is grappling with is: Do normal standards apply? And if they don’t, what should take their place? […]
may not always seem fair to Mr. Trump or his supporters. But journalism shouldn’t measure itself against any one campaign’s definition of fairness. It is journalism’s job to be true to the readers and viewers, and true to the facts, in a way that will stand up to history’s judgment. To do anything less would be untenable.
In other words, it’s Donald Trump’s fault: He’s crazy, and so journalists shouldn’t be fair in their reporting because their more important job is to prevent someone crazy like him to become President.
Putin doesn't just hate Hillary, he fears her. Otherwise he would have ignored her.
There was no campaign against Bernie or Jill.
Well, that works against cons also. If they're okay with Putin, why not with Castro?
how silly....we saw Clinton haters on this site disseminating Russian fake news and taking it as gospel....."durable adult diapers", anyone?
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
ftfy
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
:lol: