Are you the type of person who would execute wounded survivors of a missile strike?

The president has spoken.

The Narco-terrorists have been officially designated as terrorist entities.

The far left loons don’t get to decide squat.

Just sit down and the military will keep the drug runners on the bottom of the ocean.
 
So you admit there was a second strike when your boyfriend Earl denied there was.

You all need to get your stories straight.

You automatically believe what the White House says. You're a robot.
So...you're a robot. You automatically believed what the White House said when it was Biden or Obama.

Dumb clanker.
 
We are in a state of war with the "narco terrorist" organization the same way we were in a state of war with Al Qaeda. They are both terrorist organizations. We definitely are not at war with Venezuela.
Nope.

Presidents Bush and Obama legally operated under the congressional GWOT military authorization to attack Al Qaeda and its affiliates.

Trump is unilaterally claiming the right use American armed forces against drug dealers in an undeclared state of war.
 
“I can’t imagine anyone, no matter what the circumstance, believing it is appropriate to kill people who are clinging to a boat in the water,” said Michael Schmitt, a former Air Force lawyer and professor emeritus at the U.S. Naval War College. “That is clearly unlawful.”

It doesn’t matter whether the U.S. is in “armed conflict” with drug cartels as the Trump administration asserts. Such a fatal attack would have violated peacetime laws and those governing armed conflict, the experts say.




The "illegal orders ruse" has failed. So now comes the host of slander and idiocy from the hive,

{
I've taught the Laws of Armed Conflict to U.S. and mult. allied troops.

It's comical to have online experts inform me: The Laws of War do not apply to killing terrorists because Congress didn't declare war

WRONG

You can't make a 2nd strike at a boat you're sinking because there might be wounded on board

WRONG

It is murder to kill designated terrorists

WRONG

I'm sorry it gives you sadz that our Commander in Chief has decided to stop letting the cartels kill Americans by smuggling poison into our country.}

View: https://x.com/JimHansonDC/status/1995853654486581572?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1995853654486581572%7Ctwgr%5E9da6fa044ab12fd9823b937914778cb9bb90c499%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fsamj%2F2025%2F12%2F02%2Fjim-hanson-drug-boats-post-oh-hell-yeah-n2422354
 
You said no to the whole question, and only belatedly now want to backtrack to edit your response and claim you were only saying no to only part of the question.
YARP. It's not about 'backtracking'. It's not about a count. It's about stopping the smuggling before that stuff enters the country and starts killing people. Your word games change NOTHING, Clanker.
 
Nope.

Presidents Bush and Obama legally operated under the congressional GWOT military authorization to attack Al Qaeda and its affiliates.

Trump is unilaterally claiming the right use American armed forces against drug dealers in an undeclared state of war.
Not a state of war. It is legal to destroy the ships of pirates and smugglers.

Why do you support the illegal drug trade? That stuff kills people and causes immense misery.
 
Good. That will force the defense to produce evidence to the contrary.
Doesn't change a thing, Sybil.
What strikes me as odd is the fact not a single fentanyl pill has been produced as evidence by the Trump administration.

These facts are contrary to what We, the People, are being told by the Trump administration:
1. Most fentanyl comes from Mexico
2. Like Trump's Honduran friend Hernandez, Venezuela's Maduro mostly produces cocaine. Maybe Maduro didn't pay a bribe to Trump like Hernandez?
3. The boats being sunk are incapable of reaching US shores. They are all headed for Caribbean islands where they could be interdicted upon docking.
Why do you want your cocaine, Sybil?
 
{Sarcasm}
Of course I would. Per Leavitt, they're a threat to the US. Apparently they're going to swim to land and fist fight Americans?

FOX: You said the follow up strike was lawful. What law is it that allows no survivors?

LEAVITT: The strike was conducted in self defense to protect Americans

What law prohibits a second strike? Are soldier trained that if in battle they miss with the first shot, they are prohibited from taking a second.

Let us remind the leftist hypocrites trying to create a false scenario here, when Seal Team 6 assaulted the compound with Osama bin Laden in it, they left zero survivors - per their orders. Apparently they were going to flap their arms, fly to America and fist fight Americans.
 
Back
Top