Son of the Revolution
Banned
There is NO white supremacy.
Are you sure white supremacists are the problem?
- Thread starter Darth Omar
- Start date
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
/boggle....
evince
Truthmatters
We don’t let racists define what is racist
That would be like letting child molesters define what is child molestation
Son of the Revolution
Banned
keep sucking chinese dick bitch
evince
Truthmatters
The FBI said white supremacists are the biggest danger in America. They have lots of information we do not. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/04/white-supremacists-terror-threat-dhs-409236 They showed their colors 1=6.
Pax Mongolica
Equality is Fantasy
In theory, that would kill a lot of addicts, but if BC's experience was any indication, it would probably create quite a few addicts as well (ones that would survive).
I guess if you implemented this policy in every city, that would lessen the tendency for addicts to choose one city to gather in, but I don't think it would change the survival rate. You'd initially have a lot of addicts die off but then be stuck with thousands if not millions of addicts that you're providing free drugs to for many years.
Pax Mongolica
Equality is Fantasy
That's one possibility. I'm an atheist, so I also don't believe there's an afterlife, but then again, I can't assume this with 100% certainty.
Pax Mongolica
Equality is Fantasy
At some point, you'll realize that what black people have been through is not unique to them. It's also not the worst legacy for a minority either.
Americans have been encouraged to fixate on this legacy due to propaganda, but when you learn more about world history, you start to see a pattern. Humans do tend to vex and oppress each other according to tribe. Whites don't have some uniquely worse nature about them regarding this, although for a time, Europeans did dominate much of the world. They just did it later than the Mongols and Muslims.
I don't expect a "boot" coming for me, mostly because I don't make myself a target for these ideological purges your side engages in. It's easy enough to avoid the urban areas that have the worst racial tension, and I've set aside funds in the event that I need to move to another country. Thankfully, my line of work is very mobile in nature.
All I'm saying is that the left's continual attempts to blame the system over personal failings will never allow them to achieve much lasting success. Blacks who resign themselves to blaming their fate on past ills will never become wealthy. We've already seen plenty of blacks actually acquire wealth, but it is typically through the same means that other races do it -- through hard work and ambition.
Yes, what happened in Greenwood was sad and ugly, but society has improved in that aspect since then. As flawed as modern society is, one of its few advantages is that racial attacks aren't usually as bad as that now. Granted, that may change in the near future.
Pax Mongolica
Equality is Fantasy
Anti-racists behave in a racist manner, and anti-fascists think anyone they disagree with is a fascist.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Do you homework and get the actual raw numbers of "inter racial" crime, as opposed to crime in general. The rest of "us" have been laboring under propaganda, because by the very stats you use, one would have to be living in an impoverished, predominantly black area to be a victim of a black man committing a crime. Also, by your "stats" ALL WOMEN should be afraid of white men, who have been committing over 60% of the rapes for some time now. Just pointing out how 'stats' have to be carefully analyzed before being touted as the be all, end all truth.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Ahh, the stat game. Funny how when you guys trot this stuff out, you leave out little details....like the actual raw numbers the stats are based on. Example; in America the FBI and DOJ routinely use 15000 various documented crimes to break down their stats. Now, the racist rummies just love to cry, "See! 13% of the population commits 45% of the (crime of choice)". Then their brains stop working purposely....because if they continued, they would see that compared to the raw numbers of black population shows that less that 1% are actually committing those crimes. Now that doesn't mean squat to the victims families, and the truly guilty should get their punishment in court, but it hardly fits into the near hysteric mantra that you insinuate here.
As the old saying goes, figures don't lie, but liars do figure. Carry on.
Pax Mongolica
Equality is Fantasy
My point was that, if the left wants to fearmonger over racial attacks, they're deciding to focus on the attacks that are statistically less common.
Pax Mongolica
Equality is Fantasy
It is true that only a small percentage of the black community is criminal. However, the same is true for other races.
The point being made here is that, even if you account for what % of the black community commits crime and then compare it with other races, it's not favorable to blacks by comparison. And this is shown in not just America.
When considering that each nation with a significant black minority has a significantly different system but similar results, that starts to point more towards cultural issues within the black community rather than systemic issues.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
No, your point was a false equivocation and comparison. As I said, fear mongering regarding black crime never points out that one would have to be living in an impoverished, predominantly black area to be a victim of a black man committing a crime to hit a high statistic. As YOU inadvertently prove, the less common is black on non-black crime.
Now, given that black folk have been wrongfully dying by cops for decades, it's of concern being that cops are pretty much everywhere you go. You want to dismiss that as less important statistically, then do so with your assertions about black crime, because black criminals are statistically not every where like cops. Fair is fair, and you can't have it both ways. Carry on.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Your first sentence indicates an insipid stubbornness to your original contention, as you often do by stating a moot point that skews from the core of the original point you asserted.
All you do is repeat yourself while dismissing the analysis that lets the air out of your biased balloon. All you're doing is just repeating the SOS that if black folk commit any level of crime then it bodes worse than any other ethnic or racial group. A willfully ignorant and/or insipidly stubborn assertion, because if less than one percent of black folk are committing crimes, and less than 1% of all other groups are doing the same, then why are blacks being touted as worse or a bigger societal threat?
And your "explanation" asserting that despite different cultures internationally black folk are genetically predisposed to the aforementioned crimes is a-typical of the pseudo intellectual clap trap that was born of the David Duke era. However, since I pointed out the statistical anomalies that are the basis of your contentions, it would stand to reason that a similar analysis of other countries would render a similar result. In other words, your belief does not automatically equate to fact, least one ignores certain factors surrounding the subject.
Oh, and apropos to this: white women around the world have been complaining about rape, sexual harassment, spousal abuse for decades..and they weren't pointing the finger at black folk, don't cha know. Here in American, 60% and counting.
Carry on.