Are Trump supporters human?

Cypress said:
No longer interested in hearing rightwingers complain that they are forced to vote for appallingly shitty candiates, because of their hatred for the Democratic nominee. Why don't you just call yourselves the "I'm not a Democrat" party, if there are no guiding principles in wingnuttotopia, beside voting against a Democrat.

I am asking the Nora family, and others like them, to take personal responsibility for their votes instead of blaming Hillary for forcing them to vote for the least qualified, pussy grabbing reality TV star to be leader of the free world.

Everybody here is sophisticated enough to know Hillary was not going to win Texas. Drumpf won it by 10 percent. The Nora family had complete freedom to vote their conscience, and write in a candidate, or choose a third party. It is really feeble, to claim that the horror of a potential President Clinton "forced" them to vote for Pussy Grabber.

The supreme court seat did not depend on a few people in Texas voting for pussy grabber. The Texas EC votes were going to Drumpf regardless. And, even if it did matter, what kind of person puts America's alliances, her integrity, her leadership in the world, and just general competence in governance at grave risk by placing an incompetent, deranged pussy grabber in the White House on the basis of one Supreme Court seat??



Cawacko, edit to say I also think it was feeble for some liberals to say that Hillary was terrible, and they had to hold their nose voting for her only because of the sheer incompetence and buffoonery of Drumpf. Lefties who also claimed in 2000 that there was virtually "no difference" between Al Gore and George Bush also pissed me off. I am proud of my vote for Clinton; she was by any objective standards very capable of being president in both character, demeanor, temperament, experience, and gravitas. Vastly superior to the buffoonery of the Orange Clown.
Click to expand...

Just my observation but if you continue to refer to people who think or vote differently as wingnuts you probably don't really care to understand what they think. You're your own man and can say whatever the hell you like but I'm just saying.

And there's a reason the term "lessor of two evils" is often used in politics. You may be proud of every Democrat who has run for President but not everyone put's a politician on a pedestal.

It's also easy to say in retrospect Trump was going to win Texas but that wasn't necessarily the feeling leading up to it. And as many on this board say you're an idiot if you vote third party so most folks have the mindset you have to vote for one of the two candidates. That's reality.
 
Cypress said:
I voted for Hillary because she I think she is highly qualified, competent, and capable of being president. Unlike the pussy grabbing, gluttonous Orange Clown.

Nope. Not buying that wingnuts were "forced", "had no choice", or were "compelled" to vote for an overweight, pussy-grabbing reality TV star. You know how I know that is all bullshit?? Because for the past four presidential election cycles, going way back to 2004, almost all wingnuts have claimed they allegedly hated their party's candidate, but were forced to vote for them to stop the Democratic nominee. That includes George Dumbya, McCain and Palin, Mittens Romney, and Drumpf.

If Republicans are so ashamed of their candidates, over and over, and over, why the fuck are they still Republicans? I can honestly say I am not ashamed of any of my votes for Democratic presidential nominees.
Click to expand...

I'm nominally a Republican....went into exile in 1980 when the party determined to embrace Stupid.
 
Micawber said:
Oh sure, I'll offer up their names, addys, dobs and Ss# as well as audited financials for you. I gave you the same proof as your claim they are dumbasses. Zip, stalker.
Click to expand...

You said they were Liberals. All the proof I need. Where's your proof that they do what you claim they do.

Next?
 
signalmankenneth said:
TOON-Trumps_Monsters.jpg
Click to expand...

So the free speech of those at the rally and their right to assemble is superseded by the "right" to disrupt and trespass? That's weird. I thought that rights counted for all of us, including people at a rally. And that first amendment includes the right to peacefully assemble.... Tell me more about how the rights of people at an assembly you don't like don't count. It makes you sound so liberal and tolerant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top