Good point, for a change, by STY--whether it was intentional or not.
"Where's the evidence?" is indeed the wrong attitude, here.
The logical attitude is, "Who gives a fuck?"
Spoken like a true half-witted moron.

Good point, for a change, by STY--whether it was intentional or not.
"Where's the evidence?" is indeed the wrong attitude, here.
The logical attitude is, "Who gives a fuck?"

You interpreted my remarks to mean that I don't care.
What I meant was that corruptions costs us millions while bad policy costa us trillions.
First, institute good policies with capable people.
Then find a way to control the difference
between the normal perks of the powerful
and outright corruption.

Ah, no, that is a cop out, the right is making their case against Hunter based on what individuals said, not proof they offered, but on what they said, and if they were actually looking for the truth, they’d include everything everyone said, even those that refute the testimony of the suppose whistleblowers
Not a deflection, the truth
The facts: the person did testify, Comer will not release the testimony, simple question, why?

in other words, until you get what YOU want, you don't care.