Flase there are several threads here about L.A. and NYC's no bond release policy. Trumpers screaming about it.
Are conditions on pretrial release unconstitutional?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Flase there are several threads here about L.A. and NYC's no bond release policy. Trumpers screaming about it.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
sorry, my friend, but they have been issued for over 30 years
https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/gag-orders/
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
you missed the whole point, as usual.
Really? What is the point, I thought it was about taking away constitutional rights pre-trial...
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
not like this.
not with the purpose of interfering with an election.
this whole thing is bogus.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
the upset with dem cities is the no charges at all at any point.
accept the answer, renfield.
Prove that is the purpose. That is not the stated purpose. Judge had different rational.
Yakuda
Verified User
No but apparently you have no problem with it. Why are you always whining?
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
the judge is a transparently corrupt idiotic dipshit.
the soulless and brainless always end up in a mental quagmire of meaningless legalism and self-deceit.
Funny that you have no problem taking some random's freedom, but when it comes to Trump, you cry UNCONSTITUTIONAL all day.
Untrue...
ExpressLane
Verified User
According to the SCOTUS The right to criticize a government official can't be limited. Jack Smith's poor little feelings can be hurt.
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/sto...nya-chutkan-jan-6-first-amendment-free-speech
Yakuda
Verified User
Funny that you have no problem taking trump's freedom but when it comes to some randoms freedom you get a stick up your ass. This is fun isn't it?
ExpressLane
Verified User
True she is a partisan hack.
1) Does not say "cannot be limited", there are a few exceptions and terms of pre-trial release is one of them.
2) It says "Public issues" not public officials.
3) Trump is not prohibited from discussing the issue of his prosecution.
I have not taken Trumps freedom, and I have always believed in reasonable pretrial release restrictions for all defendants, Randoms and Trump the same.
Yakuda
Verified User
What a load of horseshit. You fuckers would execute trump right now if you could. Honest to goodness you can no longer be taken seriously. You used to make some sense but you're becoming increasingly more unhinged every day.
ExpressLane
Verified User
“profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.”
Trump's sharp attacks on Jack Smith and the Judge are certainly part of the national debate about the criminalization of politics. It is protected free speech according to the SCOTUS.
Hyperbole betrays your desire to ignore the reality.
What judge limited attacks on her or him?