Are Bernie Brown Shirts purposefully infecting themselves to spread COVID in the USA?

Join me in voting for Bernie in as many primaries as you can, then. It's vital that we make sure that Comrade Sanders is the DEMOCRAT facing the president in November.

I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, this is yet another Republican Fascist attempt to subvert Democracy. On the other hand, Bernie is the best chance at beating Trump, which would save our Democracy.
 
That's about as credible as some of the stories I've seen reported by CNN and The Washington Post, who cite "anonymous sources familiar with the situation" frequently.

The difference is that I'm not going to lap something like that up as gospel.

Was this a parody post designed to demonstrate the gullibility of many on the left, who fervently want to believe everything they're told that sounds negative about the president/Republicans/conservatives/white people/men/America, etc??

It's a question, speculation, and parody all in one. :thup:
 
Nope. My point is that unattributed sources that are unverifiable are never credible, in case you weren't perceptive enough to grasp that simple concept.

But you're only bringing it up now to take attention away from yet another right-wing conspiracy theory.
 
About as legit as the frequent outlandish stories about the president which quote "unnamed sources".

Or as legit as Adam Schiff's reading of the phone call transcript in his official capacity as head of our intel committee. :thup:
 
But you're only bringing it up now to take attention away from yet another right-wing conspiracy theory.

I'm not aware that it's a "right-wing conspiracy theory", and my opinion on it has been consistent throughout this discussion. I suspect that BigDog is having some fum at the left's expense.
 
So you were trolling the lefties to mock their credulousness?

That's what I think too. His credibility is now down the toilet.

giphy.gif
 
That's what I think too. His credibility is now down the toilet.

I think the credibility of any unverifiable source attributed to "anonymous sources" is what's down the toilet, which seems to be the point of BigDogs rather amusing exercise.

I'm especially amused by the usual suspects who rose to the bait so obligingly.
 
Well, the title question was legit. :0)

Kudos. I couldn't have dreamt of such a perfect trap. Now the lefties should think twice before they uncritically swallow any sketchy stories that cite "unnamed sources," with "should" being a dubious expression of hope.
 
I think the credibility of any unverifiable source attributed to "anonymous sources" is what's down the toilet, which seems to be the point of BigDogs rather amusing exercise.

I'm especially amused by the usual suspects who rose to the bait so obligingly.

So the exercise is to make him look like a retard? Well that certainly works successfully.

I could do the same thing only to end up making people think I am retarded.
 
So the exercise is to make him look like a retard? Well that certainly works successfully. I could do the same thing only to end up making people think I am retarded.

I think you're too smart to have missed the point, since you weren't taken in by the ruse, either. It's OK to laugh once in awhile.
 
I think you're too smart to have missed the point, since you weren't taken in by the ruse, either. It's OK to laugh once in awhile.

I don't find trolls to be particularly funny. I came here to have a serious discussion/debate.

Now that he has been exposed as a troll, I might ignore him from now on.

But don't worry... I am laughing at him and his sad attempt to troll people to prove a point. ;)

As to the "unverified anonymous sources", the right is guilty of that as well.
 
Back
Top