Archaeology of the New Testament

[ZenMode]

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Translation: "I've got nothing."

 

[ZenMode]

and his followers genuinely believed they saw him after the crucifixion.

They may have or may not have. You are basing that assumption on writing by people who never met Jesus and were living in a completely different country when it was written.

And, there's many inconsistencies between the writings that are CLAIMED to be from people very close to Jesus.

You want to believe something and consistently ignore anything that opposes what you want to believe.

 

[Into the Night]

Lots of opinions aren't facts! Most of Cypress's opinions aren't theology

You just called it an opinion again. That is a fact.
Go learn what 'fact' means.

 

[Into the Night]

Translation: "I've got nothing."

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Redefinition fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

They may have or may not have. You are basing that assumption on writing by people who never met Jesus and were living in a completely different country when it was written.

And, there's many inconsistencies between the writings that are CLAIMED to be from people very close to Jesus.

You want to believe something and consistently ignore anything that opposes what you want to believe.

You claim to be an export on Jesus Christ, which you say you don't believe in. Paradox.

 

[ZenMode]

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Redefinition fallacy.

Copy/paste

Translation: "I've got nothing."

 

[ZenMode]

You claim to be an export on Jesus Christ, which you say you don't believe in. Paradox.

Not true. I believe in Jesus as much as I believe in Michael Jackson or Rush Limbaugh.

 

[Cypress]

they both wanted to kill Jesus!!

That doesn't do anything to disprove what I wrote.

Catholics wanted to kill Protestants in the 16th century, even though when you get down to basics they had similar beliefs in many respects.