Arab in disputed territories slits 13 year olds throat

General knowledge quiz;

How many Palestinian girls have neoZionist stormtroopers and their High Command murdered in the Occupied Territories since the First Intifada in 2000 ?

Zero have been murdered, many have died as a direct result of Arab aggression and their use of women and children of both human bombs and human shields.

Winner gets to kick the pro-fascist ' Face,your ' in the digitals.

Fuck you you Islamo-Nazi pedophile worshipping piece of shit.
 
General knowledge quiz;

How many Palestinian girls have neoZionist stormtroopers and their High Command murdered in the Occupied Territories since the First Intifada in 2000 ?

Winner gets to kick the pro-fascist ' Face,your ' in the digitals.
 
OK- so I have to lay your lies twice inside five minutes. It doesn't bother me, troll- you simply provide the opportunities for truth regarding the brutal, ethnic cleansing doctrine of Zionism.

ONLY the illegal occupiers defy the law;

The text of the GC is plain as day it only applies to the territory of high contracting member states. Interesting ethnic cleansing which sees the Arab occupiers populations grow exponentially in both the disputed territories and Israel proper.
 
The text of the GC is plain as day it only applies to the territory of high contracting member states. Interesting ethnic cleansing which sees the Arab occupiers populations grow exponentially in both the disputed territories and Israel proper.

You've been knocked down three times in this round alone. Fourth time coming up, dead-head;

International law and Israeli settlements

The international community considers the establishment of Israeli settlements in the Israeli-occupied territories illegal under international law.[1][2][3][4][5] Israel maintains that they are consistent with international law[6] because it does not agree that the Fourth Geneva Convention applies to the territories occupied in the 1967 Six-Day War.[7] The United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Court of Justice and the High Contracting Parties to the Convention have all affirmed that the Fourth Geneva Convention does apply.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law_and_Israeli_settlements
 
You've been knocked down three times in this round alone. Fourth time coming up, dead-head;

Again the language of the GC is plain as day.


APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION
ARTICLE 2

In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in peacetime, the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may arise between two or more of the High Contracting Parties, even if the state of war is not recognized by one of them.
The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, even if the said occupation meets with no armed resistance.
Although one of the Powers in conflict may not be a party to the present Convention, the Powers who are parties thereto shall remain bound by it in their mutual relations. They shall furthermore be bound by the Convention in relation to the said Power, if the latter accepts and applies the provisions thereof.


https://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl...t&documentId=41229BA1D6F7E573C12563CD00519E4A

The PA is not a high contracting party.

Thanks for playing fuck tard
 
Again the language of the GC is plain as day.


APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION
ARTICLE 2

In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in peacetime, the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may arise between two or more of the High Contracting Parties, even if the state of war is not recognized by one of them.
The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, even if the said occupation meets with no armed resistance.
Although one of the Powers in conflict may not be a party to the present Convention, the Powers who are parties thereto shall remain bound by it in their mutual relations. They shall furthermore be bound by the Convention in relation to the said Power, if the latter accepts and applies the provisions thereof.


https://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl...t&documentId=41229BA1D6F7E573C12563CD00519E4A

The PA is not a high contracting party.

Thanks for playing fuck tard

OK- knock out coming up.
It's plain that your only hope of staying in the ring is to repeatedly parrot the text of documents which you clearly don't understand.

What we have to do is to determine whether to accept the spurious opinion of a previously-disgraced Internet troll - that's you- or to accept the deliberated conclusions of international lawyers, the United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Court of Justice and the High Contracting Parties to the Convention - who have all affirmed that the Fourth Geneva Convention does apply.

Tough choice, eh ?

Once more;

International law and Israeli settlements

The international community considers the establishment of Israeli settlements in the Israeli-occupied territories illegal under international law.[1][2][3][4][5] Israel maintains that they are consistent with international law[6] because it does not agree that the Fourth Geneva Convention applies to the territories occupied in the 1967 Six-Day War.[7] The United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Court of Justice and the High Contracting Parties to the Convention have all affirmed that the Fourth Geneva Convention does apply.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law_and_Israeli_settlements

Now, please come back as a zombie and give everybody a laugh.

zombie3.gif
 
OK- knock out coming up.
It's plain that your only hope of staying in the ring is to repeatedly parrot the text of documents which you clearly don't understand.

What we have to do is to determine whether to accept the spurious opinion of a previously-disgraced Internet troll - that's you- or to accept the deliberated conclusions of international lawyers, the United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Court of Justice and the High Contracting Parties to the Convention - who have all affirmed that the Fourth Geneva Convention does apply.

Tough choice, eh ?

Once more;



Now, please come back as a zombie and give everybody a laugh.

zombie3.gif

Plain English fuck tard:


APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION
ARTICLE 2

In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in peacetime, the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may arise between two or more of the High Contracting Parties, even if the state of war is not recognized by one of them.
The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, even if the said occupation meets with no armed resistance.
Although one of the Powers in conflict may not be a party to the present Convention, the Powers who are parties thereto shall remain bound by it in their mutual relations. They shall furthermore be bound by the Convention in relation to the said Power, if the latter accepts and applies the provisions thereof.


https://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl...t&documentId=41229BA1D6F7E573C12563CD00519E4A

So are you suggesting that the PA is a high contracting party to the GC?
 
There are so many injustices done there, we could trade stories all day long. I support the plight of the people to be treated equally. I think the USA should be nuetral on the issue as well as our media.

We'll check back in on you (and moon) if and/or when something should happen and the roles are reversed to see if you take the same neutral attitude.
 
General knowledge quiz;

How many Palestinian girls have neoZionist stormtroopers and their High Command murdered in the Occupied Territories since the First Intifada in 2000 ?

Winner gets to kick the pro-fascist ' Face,your ' in the digitals.

Didn't think you'd care unless it was one of your sub human people. It's OK when barbarians you support kill innocent people.

Run along. No one give a shit about your kind except other pieces of shit like you that don't matter.
 
We'll check back in on you (and moon) if and/or when something should happen and the roles are reversed to see if you take the same neutral attitude.

You're a very silly neoZionist back-slapper. Why should any decent person care a toss about your own ridiculous judgments concerning Israel's criminal activities.
 
General knowledge quiz;

How many Palestinian girls have neoZionist stormtroopers and their High Command murdered in the Occupied Territories since the First Intifada in 2000 ?

Winner gets to kick the pro-fascist ' Face,your ' in the digitals.
 
You're a very silly neoZionist back-slapper. Why should any decent person care a toss about your own ridiculous judgments concerning Israel's criminal activities.

Just as I thought. Another hypocritical Palestinian whining about how poorly they're treated yet supporting the killing of an innocent 13 year old.
 
General knowledge quiz;

How many Palestinian girls have neoZionist stormtroopers and their High Command murdered in the Occupied Territories since the First Intifada in 2000 ?

Winner gets to kick the pro-fascist ' Face,your ' in the digitals.


NONE.
 
Just as I thought. Another hypocritical Palestinian whining about how poorly they're treated yet supporting the killing of an innocent 13 year old.

Fallacious trolling.
You can't show any evidence at all of anybody supporting murder- except trolls such as yourself advocating the murder of Palestinians.
You're a fallacious troll.
 
General knowledge quiz;

How many Palestinian girls have neoZionist stormtroopers and their High Command murdered in the Occupied Territories since the First Intifada in 2000 ?

Winner gets to kick the pro-fascist ' Face,your ' in the digitals.


The fallacious troll claims ' None '.
 
Why do liberals continue to support Arabs and MuSLIM terrorists?

I saw a poll that said muslimes vote 70% for the democrat party. Therein lies your answer. They would have you believe that it is because they are tolerant and are trying to uphold some moral virtue. But it is all about votes
 
Fallacious trolling.
You can't show any evidence at all of anybody supporting murder- except trolls such as yourself advocating the murder of Palestinians.
You're a fallacious troll.

Your posts do just that. You have no problem with the 13 year old Israeli girl being murdered.
 
General knowledge quiz;

How many Palestinian girls have neoZionist stormtroopers and their High Command murdered in the Occupied Territories since the First Intifada in 2000 ?

Winner gets to kick the pro-fascist ' Face,your ' in the digitals.


The fallacious troll claims ' None '.

The sub human Palestinian doesn't like a correct answer.
 
Your posts do just that. You have no problem with the 13 year old Israeli girl being murdered.

Fallacious trolling- from a fallacious troll who claims that neoZionist fascists haven't murdered any Palestinian girls in the past sixteen years.
 
Back
Top