Apparently, Trump-support predicated on Sexism, Islamophobia, Homophobia

-+
Stretch said:
Sure. And, a lot of sickos supported Hillary.
Click to expand...

Weak
"A lot" is a lazy, unscientific, unquantifiable term. It is meaningless.
In a nation of 300 million people, undoubtedly "a lot" of weirdos voted for Hillary.

That is not the question this psychology sought to ask. This study found that your Pussy-Grabbing Hero overwhelmingly attracted the votes of bigots and sexists in comparison to the supporters Hillary Clinton drew. A fact you have studiously avoided addressing.

"Trump's a fascist fucking pig and I'm not afraid to say that. Anybody who's still supporting that guy can't be anything in my mind but an ignorant fucking bigot."

-- Sturgill Simpson, country music singer
Click to expand...
 
noise said:
Deep State is a shorthand term for "Un-elected bureaucrats and IC leadership" ( along with FISA abuses)
It's a very real thing when the FBI etc. becomes politicized .

But this article is claiming is 'psychology'. it's not even close.

"Massive support" is your delusion..and delusion is a real psychological term
Click to expand...
Raw Story is a trash website, anybody that uses it has no business criticising Breirbart.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Cypress said:
-+

Weak
"A lot" is a lazy, unscientific, unquantifiable term. It is meaningless.
In a nation of 300 million people, undoubtedly "a lot" of weirdos voted for Hillary.

That is not the question this psychology sought to ask. This study found that your Pussy-Grabbing Hero overwhelmingly attracted the votes of bigots and sexists in comparison to the supporters Hillary Clinton drew. A fact you have studiously avoided addressing.
Click to expand...
A lot of people think you're an odious sanctimonious hectoring cunt.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Corazón said:
No wonder you and Crypiss get on so well, you're both full of shit.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
social psychology is a study - i had to look it up.
It looks more like watered down Gestalt psychology - either that or it's a perception of the individuals reactions to... sociology..?....again though i am just not up on all this
 
Corazón said:
This might help, Crypiss is the classic keyboard SJW.

http://thedeclination.com/social-psychology-is-ridiculously-left-wing/

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

If you think Crypiss is bad, then see what the current crop of students are like. The Left is on a full blooded witch-hunt​ which started in universities. To my mind, it isn't much different to McCarthyism in the 50s, thank fuck Clinton wasn't elected.

https://www.vox.com/2015/6/3/8706323/college-professor-afraid

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Corazón said:
If you think Crypiss is bad, then see what the current crop of students are like. The Left is on a full blooded witch-hunt​ which started in universities. To my mind, it isn't much different to McCarthyism in the 50s, thank fuck Clinton wasn't elected.

https://www.vox.com/2015/6/3/8706323/college-professor-afraid

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I remember Mott telling me that the type of behaviour common in coastal universities doesn't happen in sensible places like Ohio. Sadly he is out of touch, the infection has spread. Here is the experience of a black woman who is a tenured professor. Let's see Motormouth respond to that, he won't of course.

https://www.vox.com/2015/6/10/8753721/college-professor-fear

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Corazón said:
I remember Mott telling me that the type of behaviour common in coastal universities doesn't happen in sensible places like Ohio. Sadly he is out of touch, the infection has spread.

https://www.vox.com/2015/6/10/8753721/college-professor-fear

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
she looks to be rather fixated herself
It is worth asking, Who can most afford to teach in ways that are least likely to inspire controversy? Those who are not immediately hurt by dominant ideas. And what's the most dominant idea of them all? That the white, male, heterosexual perspective is neutral, but all other perspectives are biased and must be treated with skepticism.
Click to expand...
 
anatta said:
looks at that skewed response..I don't feel like going thru the methodology...but this whole study is SJW driven
Click to expand...
This from the about section on that website, can't say that I disagree with it.

If you’ve ever read Gibbon’s opus, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, you can get a sense for how colossal the fall of a powerful civilization truly is. It doesn’t happen in a day or even a century, it’s a truly massive event. In retrospect, it always has a certain momentum of inevitability. Gibbon was the first to truly tackle the monumental collapse of Rome, and he certainly made his share of mistakes, but he wouldn’t be the last. What will future historians say of the West, a millennium from now?

It is hard to see the fall for the average person today. Technology continues to move forward. Despite the poor economic performance of late, the quality of life continues to improve. Flip on HGTV and you’ll see middle class women lamenting that they can’t find a house with that perfect color of granite counter top. The poor roam the streets with gold-plated 22 inch spinning rims. The wealth of today’s Western society is unparalleled in human history.

Nonetheless there is something wrong with the Western World. Other cultures see it, the uptick in Islamic extremist activity is one symptom of this. China continues its rise, and even leaders in the West are discussing what they will do in the new world to come, as if they’ve given up any hope of competition. The West is more concerned about the finer points of marriage law or regulations regarding health care insurance than they are on the most important thing of all: survival. Native birth rates in the West have dropped alarmingly. Americans, British, French and Germans… they are all being replaced with Arabs, Mexicans, Africans and Turks. Some people would find it racist that I would point this out, yet if it were the reverse that was happening, i.e. if the French were taking over Nigeria by immigration… would those same people not be crying “Imperialism!?” It’s only wrong when the West does it, in modern political thought. Self-loathing is an entrenched part of the Western cultural experience.

More importantly, the new immigrants are encouraged, by a hypocritical Leftist Establishment, to keep their existing identity and refuse to assimilate into the Western cultural framework. This is dangerous, and one of the strongest symptoms of the decline. Keep reading. Each post here is dedicated to one facet of the overall decline, trying to point out in aggregate what cannot be summed up in one post.
Click to expand...

http://thedeclination.com/about-dn/



Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Cypress said:
"Psychology study finds Islamophobia, homophobia, and sexism predicted support for Trump"

A*new study*published in the journal*Psychology & Sexuality*measured and compared the attitudes of Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and third party/undecided voters to understand the role that sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, and conservative ideology might have played in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

249 participants whose attitudes regarding these subjects had been previously collected were asked who they intended to vote for roughly a month prior to the election. What the researchers found was that the different voter groups differed significantly from each other on almost all 14 attitudes that were measured. In addition to analyzing group differences, they also looked at whether voting choices could be predicted from attitude scores.

Compared to Clinton voters, Trump voters scored significantly higher on every measure of prejudice and conservative ideology. Third party and undecided voters looked more like Trump voters on all measures of prejudice, except for Islamophobia. For this category, both Clinton and third party voters scored relatively .

Statistical analyses showed that voting choices could be accurately predicted by the levels of five key attitudes. Specifically, higher levels of old-fashioned homophobia, Islamophobia,*social dominance orientation, and ambivalent sexism all strongly predicted intentions to vote for Trump versus Clinton, with ambivalent sexism being the strongest predictor of all.

continued https://www.rawstory.com/2017/11/ps...hobia-and-sexism-predicted-support-for-trump/
Click to expand...

Well considering that your study uses the made up term of Islamaphobia which was invented explicitly to shield Islam and Muslim radicals from criticism then obviously your study is Postmodernist fashionable nonsense with absolutely zero scientific rigor or validity.
 
Cypress said:
I do not think you have a leg to stand on regarding criticism of jargon and buzzwords, Mr. Deep State.

Whether or not you hate the buzzwords, the fact is your Fat Orange Hero drew massive support from people who have racial resentment, bigotry towards Muslims, and who believe a woman's place is barefoot and in the kitchen.
Click to expand...

Islam isn't a race and Islamaphobia is a completely made up term used exclusively to shield Islam and Islamists from criticism, your study is a joke as are you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top