AOC engages in a battle of who's the bigger idiot

T. A. Gardner said:
You are still talking nonsense.
Click to expand...

Okay. I feel bad for you so I'll help you. This is a very simple question that might make sense to you.

Which is more likely to advance nation in terms of technology? Rednecks or AOC's demographic?

Note that technology is just one example out of many on how AOC and her demographic can improve our nation.
 
AProudLefty said:
Okay. I feel bad for you so I'll help you. This is a very simple question that might make sense to you.

Which is more likely to advance nation in terms of technology? Rednecks or AOC's demographic?

Note that technology is just one example out of many on how AOC and her demographic can improve our nation.
Click to expand...

Neither, both. Your demographic bigotry is meaningless. Many of our most important inventions were made by the equivalent of some redneck good 'ol boy in a shed. Invention knows no race or color but is rather usually a result of need or a society that allows creativity.

AOC is the antithesis of innovation in that she champions big government, socialism, and the stifling of creativity. As yet another example, there is a Muslim woman in the picture. Islamic states to one degree or another stifle innovation, creativity, and even the arts because of religious intolerance. I'll toss in that the sort of political intolerance AOC regularly exhibits also stifles innovation. That's equally true of the radical Left and Right. Neither is going to advance society in a positive way, and there's centuries of proof of that.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Neither, both. Your demographic bigotry is meaningless. Many of our most important inventions were made by the equivalent of some redneck good 'ol boy in a shed. Invention knows no race or color but is rather usually a result of need or a society that allows creativity.

AOC is the antithesis of innovation in that she champions big government, socialism, and the stifling of creativity. As yet another example, there is a Muslim woman in the picture. Islamic states to one degree or another stifle innovation, creativity, and even the arts because of religious intolerance. I'll toss in that the sort of political intolerance AOC regularly exhibits also stifles innovation. That's equally true of the radical Left and Right. Neither is going to advance society in a positive way, and there's centuries of proof of that.
Click to expand...

Bigotry? :rofl2:

And there it is!!! That big bad ugly socialism. Oh toss in Islam.

The GOP Bingo.
 
AProudLefty said:
What ad hominem?
Click to expand...

Ad-Hominem-Fallacy.jpg


Rather than address what I stated, you tossed insults to my argument at me. Classic ad hominem.

Which is more likely to advance nation in terms of technology? Rednecks or AOC's demographic?
Click to expand...

You stated that. It is a form of bigotry to single out some group without showing cause. Your assumption obviously was that Rednecks are incapable of advancing technology while AOC's "demographic"--whatever that is outside of radical Leftists--is.

I then point out that Islamic states rarely advance society or technology and why that is. You might note that Dar al Islam has produced next to zero Nobel Prizes in anything that really advances society or technology. That dearth of awards, and not just Nobels but across the board, is largely due to the religious tenants of Islam. Religion throughout history, particularly state religions, like Islam, and ones imposed on all of a society have the effect of stopping or slowing societal growth and technological advancement to a crawl.

Socialism does the exact same thing. In a Socialist state there is little or no incentive to buck the system and no real incentive to creativity or technological advancement outside of whatever the ruling party in power wants. Even then, such advancements will be limited to what government expects as an outcome.

Neither the radical Left or Right advances society. They are both too extreme to do so.

That's why AOC is a net drag on society and invention, not a motivator of it.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
*unnecessary and pointless image snipped*

Rather than address what I stated, you tossed insults to my argument at me. Classic ad hominem.
Click to expand...

What insults? I have not insulted you in any way. You mean me feeling bad for you? That's a fact, not an insult. It's the same way with my special needs students.

You stated that. It is a form of bigotry to single out some group without showing cause. Your assumption obviously was that Rednecks are incapable of advancing technology while AOC's "demographic"--whatever that is outside of radical Leftists--is.
Click to expand...

I prefaced that with the statement about making it simple for you. The term "rednecks" is an hyperbole to push across the point. It is a fact that Asians and other non-white folks excel well in mathematics and technology. That isn't "bigotry". It's just a simple fact.

I then point out that Islamic states rarely advance society or technology and why that is.
Click to expand...

You are talking about the Radical Islam, not Islam in general. The Arabs have advanced much in mathematics and sciences. Where do you think we got Algebra from?

Religion throughout history, particularly state religions, like Islam, and ones imposed on all of a society have the effect of stopping or slowing societal growth and technological advancement to a crawl.
Click to expand...

Thank you, Captain Obvious. The same can be said for Christianity or any other religions.

Socialism does the exact same thing.
Click to expand...

No it does not. In socialism, people work together. There are no "freeloaders".

That's why AOC is a net drag on society and invention, not a motivator of it.
Click to expand...

You just hate AOC because she's a Liberal. Why cannot you be honest and tell the truth for once?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top