ANY PERSON...

Unconstitutional

Still a person.
MAGAts/neo-Nazis/White Nationalists believe only Euro-American males have Constitutional rights. You know, just like the Founders wrote. Never mind the intervening centuries since. :thup:
 
"nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;"

Supreme law of our land.
An illegal alien being deported is not deprived of life, liberty, or property.
States do not deport. The federal government deports and maintains the national borders.
 
That part is regarding citizens of the Nation you brainless dunce.

Illegal aliens are neither citizens, nor do they have any constitutional rights. Their only right is to be deported back to where they came from and prevented from ever applying for legal entry.
Rights do not come from a piece of paper.
 
And not quite how that is suppose to relate to the 14th Amendment, especially give the 14th Amendment came a hundred years later, and in 1776 no one was globalists, that is why they fought pointless wars endlessly, you do know this is the 21st Century, correct?
Random phrases. No apparent coherency. Nothing in the Constitution expires by age, anchovies.
 
The Constitution also does not say we have any right to privacy,
The Constitution does discuss the right of privacy (it doesn't grant it) in the 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments.
nor that a President has immunity,
See Article II.
now does that mean privacy doesn’t exist nor the President isn’t immune?
Rights do not come from a piece of paper, anchovies.
You ought to buy a mirror before you start throwing around the play yard insults
What 'play yard insults', anchovies??????
 
He said as much.
Really? In your own words, what is scotus and what are some of the things that scotus does?

After you answer that, tell me if that sounds like a document to you.

We both know that you won't actually respond to what I asked. You'll come back with some more of your retarded word games and, in doing so, will acknowledge your idiocy.
 
And not quite how that is suppose to relate to the 14th Amendment, especially give the 14th Amendment came a hundred years later, and in 1776 no one was globalists, that is why they fought pointless wars endlessly, you do know this is the 21st Century, correct?
England had colonies throughout the world. The sun truly never set on the British Empire.
The Dutch East India company delivered practically door to door from around the world.
Who are you to say a war is 'pointless'? You don't get to speak for everyone and you don't get to speak for the dead. Omniscience fallacy.

Today, we have internet, global deliveries by DHL and UPS instead of the Dutch East India company, and international businesses, just like in 1776.
 
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.


Can you not read? The framers of the 14th intentionally defined three separate groups and identified different rights for each group.
I guess you cannot read, Pretender. They just be subjects of jurisdiction of the United States, not subjects of some other nation.
 
^^^
Another MAGAt white nationalist who doesn't understand history.

Noncitizens undeniably have a wide range of rights under the Constitution. Indeed, within the borders of the United States, they have most of the same rights as citizens do, and longstanding Supreme Court precedent bans most state laws discriminating against noncitizens. There is little if any serious controversy among experts over this matter.

Do undocumented immigrants have constitutional rights?

The Constitution protects all people living in the United States, regardless of immigration status. Most constitutional provisions apply based on personhood, not citizenship. In other words, if an individual is physically present in the US, they are entitled to the protections granted by the Constitution.
SCOTUS is not the Constitution, Sybil.
 
Back
Top