Any losing candidate in history could have created "election denial" movement

BartenderElite

Verified User
Any losing candidate in history could have created "election denial" movement

Presidential campaigns are intense and supporters on both sides get extremely passionate about them, and about the outcome. It's why it has become such an important tradition for losing candidates to concede, and urge their supporters to unite behind the new President.

Any previous loser could have cried "foul" and refused to concede, and told their supporters that the election was stolen. Any loser can put their ego above the country.

And no - Gore didn't do that. The Florida rules allotted for recounts if the election was within a certain margin, and he just pursued that. When SCOTUS ruled, he didn't fight it. He went on TV, conceded and urged his supporters to get behind the Bush admin.

Trump wasn't man enough to do that. He is, in many ways, the ultimate loser. He put his ego above country, and has actively undermined election integrity - one of the foundations of our democracy - for 2 years now. And we can see how millions of lemmings just fall into line once the leader pursues that course.
 
Presidential campaigns are intense and supporters on both sides get extremely passionate about them, and about the outcome. It's why it has become such an important tradition for losing candidates to concede, and urge their supporters to unite behind the new President.

Any previous loser could have cried "foul" and refused to concede, and told their supporters that the election was stolen. Any loser can put their ego above the country.

And no - Gore didn't do that. The Florida rules allotted for recounts if the election was within a certain margin, and he just pursued that. When SCOTUS ruled, he didn't fight it. He went on TV, conceded and urged his supporters to get behind the Bush admin.

Trump wasn't man enough to do that. He is, in many ways, the ultimate loser. He put his ego above country, and has actively undermined election integrity - one of the foundations of our democracy - for 2 years now. And we can see how millions of lemmings just fall into line once the leader pursues that course.

Nothing to do with ego. People need to understand this has nothing to do with psychology.
 
it would probably never happened if the demmycrats hadn't opted for an unconstitutional election........

Congress wouldn't certify an unconstitutional election, and if there was any real evidence of that, SCOTUS would have ruled on it.

No - it probably never would have happened if a narcissist could have had just one moment in his life where he manned up and admitted that he lost.
 
Congress wouldn't certify an unconstitutional election, and if there was any real evidence of that, SCOTUS would have ruled on it.

No - it probably never would have happened if a narcissist could have had just one moment in his life where he manned up and admitted that he lost.

You are way off. Trump planned the coup. It has nothing to do with psychology. You are actually helping Trump's agenda.
 
Presidential campaigns are intense and supporters on both sides get extremely passionate about them, and about the outcome. It's why it has become such an important tradition for losing candidates to concede, and urge their supporters to unite behind the new President.

Any previous loser could have cried "foul" and refused to concede, and told their supporters that the election was stolen. Any loser can put their ego above the country.

And no - Gore didn't do that. The Florida rules allotted for recounts if the election was within a certain margin, and he just pursued that. When SCOTUS ruled, he didn't fight it. He went on TV, conceded and urged his supporters to get behind the Bush admin.

Trump wasn't man enough to do that. He is, in many ways, the ultimate loser. He put his ego above country, and has actively undermined election integrity - one of the foundations of our democracy - for 2 years now. And we can see how millions of lemmings just fall into line once the leader pursues that course.


Gore Lost in the Supreme Court the SC didn't look into the violation of the Constitution in 2020 election.

Democrat politicians objecting to election results.

Objection to the 2000 presidential election
Hastings and other members of the House of Representatives objected to counting the 25 electoral votes from Florida which George W. Bush narrowly won after a contentious recount. ...

Objection to the 2004 presidential election
Hastings was one of the 31 House Democrats who voted not to count the 20 electoral votes from Ohio in the 2004 presidential election, despite Republican President George W. Bush winning the state by 118,457 votes.[22][23] Without Ohio's electoral votes, the election would have been decided by the U.S. House of Representatives, with each state having one vote in accordance with the Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcee...chment trial,was also controlled by Democrats.
 
Presidential campaigns are intense and supporters on both sides get extremely passionate about them, and about the outcome. It's why it has become such an important tradition for losing candidates to concede, and urge their supporters to unite behind the new President.

Any previous loser could have cried "foul" and refused to concede, and told their supporters that the election was stolen. Any loser can put their ego above the country.

And no - Gore didn't do that. The Florida rules allotted for recounts if the election was within a certain margin, and he just pursued that. When SCOTUS ruled, he didn't fight it. He went on TV, conceded and urged his supporters to get behind the Bush admin.

Trump wasn't man enough to do that. He is, in many ways, the ultimate loser. He put his ego above country, and has actively undermined election integrity - one of the foundations of our democracy - for 2 years now. And we can see how millions of lemmings just fall into line once the leader pursues that course.

All true. The difference seems to be Trump’s puppet master hold on his voters. Could Gore have done it if he tried or Hillary? Doubt it and both had closer defeats than Trump. Gore’s was a whisper.
 
Presidential campaigns are intense and supporters on both sides get extremely passionate about them, and about the outcome. It's why it has become such an important tradition for losing candidates to concede, and urge their supporters to unite behind the new President.

Any previous loser could have cried "foul" and refused to concede, and told their supporters that the election was stolen. Any loser can put their ego above the country.

And no - Gore didn't do that. The Florida rules allotted for recounts if the election was within a certain margin, and he just pursued that. When SCOTUS ruled, he didn't fight it. He went on TV, conceded and urged his supporters to get behind the Bush admin.

Trump wasn't man enough to do that. He is, in many ways, the ultimate loser. He put his ego above country, and has actively undermined election integrity - one of the foundations of our democracy - for 2 years now. And we can see how millions of lemmings just fall into line once the leader pursues that course.

LIKE AL GORE, JR. AND HILLARY CLINTON BOTH DID...
 
But none has until now, and it took a Trump to do it.

He couldn't have imagined he had a realistic chance of hanging on after 2020 - he's not that much of a fool - but his ego wouldn't let him stop. And to hell with the country.

He's ALL about ego.

Our nation is in a crisis of democracy. Talking about ego only makes it worse.
 
But none has until now, and it took a Trump to do it.

He couldn't have imagined he had a realistic chance of hanging on after 2020 - he's not that much of a fool - but his ego wouldn't let him stop. And to hell with the country.

He's ALL about ego.

AL GORE, JR. HILLARY CLINTON. Der..
 
Back
Top