Anti-CRT law also bans Christianity

Flash said:
Both men were convicted of threatening the president and both convictions were overturned.

The LBJ case was based on a condition which might never occur and he did not threaten harm.

A person must claim he is going to commit a violent act against a specific person. Secret Service investigates many threats each year but conclude most are just expressions of hate and not serious.
Click to expand...
Awesome.

First, I’m not a fucking lawyer nor to I play one on line. :)

Second, what does this have to do with our conversation about the purpose of government and the plethora of authoritarian cocksuckers on JPP?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Awesome.

First, I’m not a fucking lawyer nor to I play one on line. :)

Second, what does this have to do with our conversation about the purpose of government and the plethora of authoritarian cocksuckers on JPP?
Click to expand...

I thought we were talking about restrictions on our rights as part of the discussion about the purpose of government.
 
Flash said:
I thought we were talking about restrictions on our rights as part of the discussion about the purpose of government.
Click to expand...
I disagree that the purpose of government is to restrict rights….as did the Founders who put it far better than I could ever do:

https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
 
After seeing the movie, The Gangs Of New York, I always wondered why that story was never told in High School American History books.

We seemed to be taught that all the racists came from the south!
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
After seeing the movie, The Gangs Of New York, I always wondered why that story was never told in High School American History books.

We seemed to be taught that all the racists came from the south!
Click to expand...

That’s because Yankee racists wrote the history books. :thup:
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Since when did public schools teach religion in any case?
Click to expand...

The anti-CRT law bans anything that makes anyone feel bad about history, in either a public or private setting. Companies are shocked that they are being banned from talking to employees the way they want.
 
FreeSpeech1789 said:
That's not what the CRT bill bans, it bans anti-white racist indoctrination, why do you wabt to hold Maoist struggle sessions where the bourgeois are replaced by whites and the proletariat are replaced by blacks? Sounds pretty racist to me.
Click to expand...

You have no defense to the reality, so you make insane allegations against others.
 
Flash said:
One function of the government is to protect our rights but it also grants those rights by enumerating those we possess.
Click to expand...

Does someone in a private business have the right to say things that might hurt the feelings of someone else? Or do "hurt feelings" trump all rights?
 
Code1211 said:
The rudeness of many here is apparent.

Where there is rudeness, thought seems to be absent.

So it is with you.
Click to expand...

You're nothing more than a brain dead hypocrite. Get busy now and tell everyone on the forum the same thing you halfwit. :palm:

half-wit
noun
\ ˈhaf-ˌwit , ˈhäf- \
: a foolish or stupid person
 
Walt said:
Does someone in a private business have the right to say things that might hurt the feelings of someone else? Or do "hurt feelings" trump all rights?
Click to expand...

There is no right to not be offended. The following is a list of all the things you are entitled to:









....the end. :palm:
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Why? You wouldn't read it. LOL

Isn't Code 1211 the Texas code for sexual predators, subsection critters?

As for the CRT nonsense, it appears both racial and religious based....not exactly new in America since Anita Bryant, Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin: https://religionandpolitics.org/202...l-race-theory-being-banned-in-public-schools/

On its face, religion appears most relevant to the current attacks against CRT because of the movement’s particular players. Opposition to CRT has been fostered in religious settings and, in many cases, structured by conservative Christian frameworks. For example, the Southern Baptist Convention resolved in 2019 that CRT and intersectionality are “unbiblical ideologies.” In June, famed televangelist Pat Robertson referred to CRT as a “monstrous evil.” The history of Christian conservatives’ role in culture war politics is vital to understanding the current CRT bans. Since at least the 1960s, Christian conservatives have mobilized against what they have deemed as liberal, secular “indoctrination” in schools, and their arguments, strategies, and networks are all relevant here. The attacks on CRT are also part of the ongoing debates about public education as a vehicle for moral and spiritual values.
Click to expand...

IT's a hateful and divisive ideology designed to divide america.
 
Truth Detector said:
You're nothing more than a brain dead hypocrite. Get busy now and tell everyone on the forum the same thing you halfwit. :palm:

half-wit
noun
\ ˈhaf-ˌwit , ˈhäf- \
: a foolish or stupid person
Click to expand...

You stupidly prove my assertion by your response.

It's amusing.

Even though i've Figured out the ignore function, I'll give you one more chance to post something that is not as stupid as the posts you have been making so far.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top