Antarctic sea ice 'obliterates' previous minimum record, in remarkable reverse

tsuke said:
the middle east becomes unlivable with global warming right? Maybe its a good thing it would solve a lot of problems :)
Click to expand...

Actually, it WILL create more problems. They aren't just going to sit still and wither away. They will fight to survive. This comment was incredibly short-sighted.
 
DigitalDave said:
Actually, it WILL create more problems. They aren't just going to sit still and wither away. They will fight to survive. This comment was incredibly short-sighted.
Click to expand...

As of right now they are already having trouble crossing the med to get to Europe :) I would imagine it would get harder if there was more water in the way. Maybe in they can invade Africa or Pakistan :)
 
tsuke said:
As of right now they are already having trouble crossing the med to get to Europe :) I would imagine it would get harder if there was more water in the way. Maybe in they can invade Africa or Pakistan :)
Click to expand...

Right, because families dying of starvation through extreme weather conditions is a joyous thought! Does it make you jizz yourself?
 
DigitalDave said:
lol, sourcing a clearly biased site misinterpreting studies does not stop the warming.
Click to expand...
That's true. So what will?
And what website on the subject isn't biased? Anything that says anything other than the fact that AGW is nothing more than an unproven hypothesis is blatantly biased.
 
Stopping deforestation, reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Some man-made ideas like pumping water over the ice caps so that it freezes have been ideas brought up.
 
DigitalDave said:
Right, because families dying of starvation through extreme weather conditions is a joyous thought! Does it make you jizz yourself?
Click to expand...

Your Al Gorian policies of converting food crops to fuel have already caused starvation. :palm:
 
DigitalDave said:
Stopping deforestation, reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Some man-made ideas like pumping water over the ice caps so that it freezes have been ideas brought up.
Click to expand...

Al Gorians are not interested in stopping deforestation. They simply suggest that if you cut down old forest growth in Brazil, you need only plant some trees in Mozambique to make up for it.
 
Micawber said:
Just curious what motivates you to hatefully middle finger the vast consensus of science, even after big oil concedes. There is no dog in the hunt. It's over. You are like a hick in the woods fighting the civil war 50 years after surrender to Grant
Click to expand...

Mentioning "Consensus" and "Science" in one sentence is like saying "its cold as hell outside today". Science is not based upon a consensus which is nothing but a popular opinion....Science is based upon an application of the Scientific Method: In order for any phenomenon to be considered "scientific" the method of investigation uses "empirical" or "quantifiable" measurement to produce an "observed", "reproducible" "experiment" that "constantly" maintains a standard that can be used to calibrate FACTS of SCIENCE. Man made climate change is far from a demonstrable FACT OF SCIENCE.

Its more than pompous to suggest that man can control future weather events....i.e., climate changes by the regulation of CARBON, one of the most critical element requirements for life on earth...as every life form on earth depends upon carbon in one form or another to simply exist. All known Life on earth is CARBON BASED. To pretend and act as if its somehow poisoning LIFE on earth is laughable. The earth has gone though many examples of heating and cooling over the eon's long before man appeared. In the 70s the CONSENSUS was the earth was heading into another ice age before the turn of the century...proving what? OPINIONS VARY and SHIFT...facts of science do not.

Anyone....a challenge: Present one report from all those consensus (wink, wink) scientists that does not include words like. "Looks Like" "Appears" "Suggests" "Points to" "Most Likely" "Could Have" etc.., real empirical terms for science :palm:
 
Last edited:
aloysious said:
That's true. So what will?
And what website on the subject isn't biased? Anything that says anything other than the fact that AGW is nothing more than an unproven hypothesis is blatantly biased.
Click to expand...

Reading the studies themselves is usually the best approach. For instance, reading the actual study that was referenced in his article, I was able to deduce that it was a forecast stating that the we are heading towards an Ice Age of 2015, and it was based solely off Total Solar Irradiance. The scientist believed that greenhouse gases will not have much impact, and we should begin cooling as of 2015. Since then, his forecast has been 'off'. It should be more glaring now than it was before, that the effect from greenhouse gases DO impact climate because his prediction was off, but not if this article could spin it for you.
 
Ralph said:
Its more than pompous to suggest that man can control future weather events....i.e., climate changes by the regulation of CARBON, one of the most critical element requirements for life on earth...as every life form on earth depends upon carbon in one form or another to simply exist. All known Life on earth is CARBON BASED. To pretend and act as if its somehow poisoning LIFE on earth is laughable. The earth has gone though many examples of heating and cooling over the eon's long before man appeared. In the 70s the CONSENSUS was the earth was heading into another ice age before the turn of the century...proving what? OPINIONS VARY and SHIFT...facts of science do not.
Click to expand...

It's not CARBON, it's 1 part Carbon, 2 parts Oxygen. It's not pompous to know how the greenhouse effect works.
 
DigitalDave said:
You're a fucking imbecile. You don't belong in a serious discussion with me because you clearly are a dumbfuck.
Click to expand...

Starving the poor, driving up energy prices for the poor, that's what POS
Al Gorians like you do. You got yours, what the fuck do you care.

Meantime, what are you doing about shark finning, longline fishing, bottom trawling, and bycatch killing you anti-environmentalist, pro nuke plant, Al Gorian worshiper.
 
Bigdog said:
Starving the poor, driving up energy prices for the poor, that's what POS
Al Gorians like you do. You got yours, what the fuck do you care.

Meantime, what are you doing about shark finning, longline fishing, bottom trawling, and bycatch killing you anti-environmentalist, pro nuke plant, Al Gorian worshiper.
Click to expand...

You obviously don't know shit about me or my politics. You can go straight fuck yourself. IGNORED!
 
DigitalDave said:
You obviously don't know shit about me or my politics. You can go straight fuck yourself. IGNORED!
Click to expand...

I know you are an Al Gorian, ... the essence of evil. Go starve children to death, it's what you do best.
 
didnt al gore say something like the world was supposed to end due to climate change a couple of years ago?
 
Ralph said:
Mentioning "Consensus" and "Science" in one sentence is like saying "its cold as hell outside today". Science is not based upon a consensus which is nothing but a popular opinion....Science is based upon an application of the Scientific Method: In order for any phenomenon to be considered "scientific" the method of investigation uses "empirical" or "quantifiable" measurement to produce an "observed", "reproducible" "experiment" that "constantly" maintains a standard that can be used to calibrate FACTS of SCIENCE. Man made climate change is far from a demonstrable FACT OF SCIENCE.

Its more than pompous to suggest that man can control future weather events....i.e., climate changes by the regulation of CARBON, one of the most critical element requirements for life on earth...as every life form on earth depends upon carbon in one form or another to simply exist. All known Life on earth is CARBON BASED. To pretend and act as if its somehow poisoning LIFE on earth is laughable. The earth has gone though many examples of heating and cooling over the eon's long before man appeared. In the 70s the CONSENSUS was the earth was heading into another ice age before the turn of the century...proving what? OPINIONS VARY and SHIFT...facts of science do not.

Anyone....a challenge: Present one report from all those consensus (wink, wink) scientists that does not include words like. "Looks Like" "Appears" "Suggests" "Points to" "Most Likely" "Could Have" etc.., real empirical terms for science :palm:
Click to expand...

They started talking about another Ice Age, back in the 60's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top