Another whining Rightie.

He seems to have fled the thread.

In the temporary absence of the thread derailer, I guess we need to give Fleming more tax cuts, since he cannot expand his business on a measly after-tax profit of $400K.

Let's bail out Republican-owned sandwich shops, so Fleming can create some jobs.

That's personal responsibility in action in the marketplace, right?
 
\(\()/)/ said:
He seems to have fled the thread.

In the temporary absence of the thread derailer, I guess we need to give Fleming more tax cuts, since he cannot expand his business on a measly after-tax profit of $400K.

Let's bail out Republican-owned sandwich shops, so Fleming can create some jobs.

That's personal responsibility in action in the marketplace, right?
Click to expand...

Rightie-o!

Because as any good economist will tell you, nothing will get America back on track faster than a bunch of low paying, minimum wage service industry jobs!
 
Obviously the only way to boot employment is to cut spending on social programs, education, and other government sectors righties don't like.


Then we can give more tax cuts, loopholes, and subsidies to big corporations and the the rich, because that's worked so well in the past.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
ANOTHER nice dodge. Still won't admit you were wrong about "running the business" on 400k...why am I not surprised?
Click to expand...

how does telling you that you're ignorant and dead wrong a "dodge"? are you really this dishonest.

investment in new locations, upgrade locations, buy more equipment is part of running a business. that you don't that and are adamant you're right proves you're more dumb that i thought.

new locations falls under expansion. if you don't have the cash to expand, you have to borrow. expansion is a business plan, and integral to business, if subway had never expanded, then how big would their business be?

upgrading locations is very important to business. if you have an antiquated or rundown location customers may be put off. if you go into most fast food restaurants now, you will see they have upgraded their current locations in order to appeal more to customers.

buy more equipment is integral. if you need the equipment in order to run a more efficient business, not purchasing the equipment means you're not efficient. that could mean less efficiency to the customer or to your bottom line.

get an education because you're making a fool out of yourself.
 
Yurt said:
how does telling you that you're ignorant and dead wrong a "dodge"? are you really this dishonest.
Click to expand...

You have now spent FOUR POSTS avoiding admitting you were wrong when you said he ran the business on $400,000.00


Yurt said:
investment in new locations, upgrade locations, buy more equipment is part of running a business. that you don't that and are adamant you're right proves you're more dumb that i thought.
Click to expand...

Investment, UPgrading and buying MORE equipment is all part of REINVESTING...not ordinary day-to-day running of the business...that you play your famous semantic word games is proof you know you are lying.


Yurt said:
new locations falls under expansion. if you don't have the cash to expand, you have to borrow. expansion is a business plan, and integral to business, if subway had never expanded, then how big would their business be?
Click to expand...

And "expansion" is also referred to as what?

"REINVESTMENT".


Yurt said:
upgrading locations is very important to business. if you have an antiquated or rundown location customers may be put off. if you go into most fast food restaurants now, you will see they have upgraded their current locations in order to appeal more to customers.
Click to expand...

UPgrading a current location already owned in order to appeal MORE to customers is also known as "REINVESTMENT".

Yurt said:
buy more equipment is integral. if you need the equipment in order to run a more efficient business, not purchasing the equipment means you're not efficient. that could mean less efficiency to the customer or to your bottom line.
Click to expand...

If you buy more equipment to run your business more efficiently, then you are "REINVESTING" in the business.


Yurt said:
get an education because you're making a fool out of yourself.
Click to expand...

You are wrong...wrong on point one...and wrong throughout the rest of the post. You did however put on a nice display of the pissy little semantic word games you have to resort to in order to continue to respond.

What kind of juvenile need to be right drives someone so obviously filled with hatred for the person he is discussing the topic with that he can't even rationally discuss the differences between normal day-to-day operations and "reinvestment"
 
ZappasGuitar;871774]You have now spent FOUR POSTS avoiding admitting you were wrong when you said he ran the business on $400,000.00
Click to expand...

you're skewing what i really said, as usual. desperate to get a gotcha moment, instead of focusing on the issue, you will obsess over this now.



Investment, UPgrading and buying MORE equipment is all part of REINVESTING...not ordinary day-to-day running of the business...that you play your famous semantic word games is proof you know you are lying.
Click to expand...

did i say it was "ordinary day to day"? no, and neither did he. you claimed it was not part of running a business, that simply is not true.



And "expansion" is also referred to as what?

"REINVESTMENT".
Click to expand...

see above.



UPgrading a current location already owned in order to appeal MORE to customers is also known as "REINVESTMENT".
Click to expand...

see above



If you buy more equipment to run your business more efficiently, then you are "REINVESTING" in the business.
Click to expand...

see above


You are wrong...wrong on point one...and wrong throughout the rest of the post. You did however put on a nice display of the pissy little semantic word games you have to resort to in order to continue to respond.

What kind of juvenile need to be right drives someone so obviously filled with hatred for the person he is discussing the topic with that he can't even rationally discuss the differences between normal day-to-day operations and "reinvestment"
Click to expand...

no semantics at all. you first claimed that reinvesting is not part of business, now (as usual) you move the goal post and claim it is not part of the "everyday" part of business. you fucked up and look like an idiot.
 
Should tax cuts bail out businesses that claim they can't afford to expand?
 
Yurt said:
should people that make more than you, be taxed more, simply for making more than you?
Click to expand...


Did I say that?


Income tax is keyed to level of income already, isn't it?


Educate yourself: http://www.irs.gov/taxpros/article/0,,id=98137,00.html


Now, should tax cuts bail out businesses that claim they can't afford to expand, like Fleming, who "only" cleared $400 K after taxes?


And where are those "numerous" posts showing that you opposed extending the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy?​
 
\(\()/)/ said:
Did I say that?


Income tax is keyed to level of income already, isn't it?


Educate yourself: http://www.irs.gov/taxpros/article/0,,id=98137,00.html


Now, should tax cuts bail out businesses that claim they can't afford to expand, like Fleming, who "only" cleared $400 K after taxes?


And where are those "numerous" posts showing that you opposed extending the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy?​
Click to expand...

did you say that?

did you start a whole new thread based on my question?

was it because you felt you would not receive the attention you crave if you answered the question here?
 
Where are those "numerous" posts showing that you opposed extending the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Why, we'd all be just flabbergasted!

FLABBERGASTED I say!

It would be so unlike you to DODGE a simple request and AVOID posting the proof to back up your allegation...
Click to expand...

you mean like the claim i've been banned, you mean like the claim you changed punctuation but avoided posting the proof, you mean like accusing USF of something and avoiding posting the proof

weak projection on your part. at least you've stopped making an ass out of yourself by claiming those activities are not part of running a business. truly embarrassing for you.
 
Yurt said:
you're skewing what i really said, as usual. desperate to get a gotcha moment, instead of focusing on the issue, you will obsess over this now.





did i say it was "ordinary day to day"? no, and neither did he. you claimed it was not part of running a business, that simply is not true.





see above.





see above





see above




no semantics at all. you first claimed that reinvesting is not part of business, now (as usual) you move the goal post and claim it is not part of the "everyday" part of business. you fucked up and look like an idiot.
Click to expand...


I claimed "reinvestment" isn't part of business? I'd ask for proof, but...well, as everyone has learned over the past few months, you don't do proof.

Right on schedule the pissy, hair-splitting, semantic word games from Yurt begin!

Yurt is nothing if not predictable...he know's he's been caught lying for something like the hundredth time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top