ANOTHER Trump Tantrum

Did I use the word "always"?

No?

There you go.

:rofl2:

Since, as you admit, I don't always defend Trump, why did you make that comment? Am I not allowed to discuss the truth of the matter?

And thank you for admitting I do not always defend Trump. Your comments indicate that Buckly is a liar by saying so.
 
And now Tightie Rightie is all butthurt that he's getting back what he dished out.

Astounding how many JPP righties there are who like to dish it out, but just can't take it.
 
What cracks me up is that Zappas always cries, they started it.

Of course he never responds to the posts in a thread where no one has insulted him or even mentioned him and he comes in with insults a blazing. What a lying tool. Because someone else always started it. So, despite saying insults are bad, they are okay for him, because someone else started it.

He is incapable of taking responsibility for his actions or to engage in self awareness.
 
Here is Zappas on thread banning, despite the fact he has, again, thread banned me from another thread.

What was originally a tool to keep TROLLS out, has now morphed into a way to CENSOR any opposing viewpoint.

And sadly, more often than not it's one of the Mods doing the CENSORING

They do this because they realize that their flimsy, invective filled diatribes could NEVER withstand much scrutiny.

:rofl2:
 
Here is Zappas on thread banning, despite the fact he has, again, thread banned me from another thread.

:rofl2:

And I guess since you just cannot stay on topic you will continue to be banned.

I've given you a number of chances and for some reason staying on topic is beyond your control.

Ah well, I will make it somehow...:rofl2:
 
And I guess since you just cannot stay on topic you will continue to be banned.

I've given you a number of chances and for some reason staying on topic is beyond your control.

Ah well, I will make it somehow...:rofl2:

I've not spoken on topic in any of your threads?

Is that your claim? Yes or no.
 
First off you have an american citizen, not a russian, be the target of an FBI investigation in the middle of the campaign. Remember the FISA court only denied 11 requests in its existence. The obama admin had to burn thru 2 of those denials to find the right judge to grant it. If Page spoke to trump the FBI would have been entitled to listen in. If there was a meeting of campaign staff the FBI was entitled to listen in. The entire subject of the FISA request was campaign interference. There was no chance they did not get information.

We now know Rice requested for multiple names to be unmasked for public viewing.

We know by their own admission Obama staffers leaked info to the press, congress, and other relevant democrats.

We know by their admission that they loosened the rules for sharing between agencies so that more people could access the info.

I dont know what else your looking for.

Contrast this to wikileaks russiagate. The principal actor, wikileaks, which has never had to retract anything ever says the Russians have nothing to do with it.

In other words you have nothing lol.
 
UH OH!

Yoyo is worried the truth about his refusal to stay on topic might come out.

Oh if only he had spent a bit more time actually discussing the subject.

:rofl2:
 
Back
Top