Another Study Shows People With A Low IQ Generally Support The Right-Wing

poet

Banned
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/0...w-iq-and-right-wing-ideology-go-hand-in-hand/

Okay now, liberals, don’t get all smug and conservatives, don’t get defensive. The studies hit a hot-button trifecta – examining intelligence, racism and ideology – and our ability to remain objective may be strained. But… it is what it is so let’s dive right in.

The first studies of the correlation between intelligence and racism were done in the U.K. and involved children born in 1958 and another group born in 1970. The children’s intelligence was tested at age 10-11 and at age 30-33, their levels of social conservatism were measured. Verbal and nonverbal intelligence at the early ages was gauged using words, symbols and shapes. The later tests used four methods of testing cognitive abilities. The average IQ for comparison was set at 100.

The adults were given statements with which to agree or disagree dealing with social issues such as women working outside the home and what children should be taught in school. They also answered questions as to whether or not they’d work with people of other races. Once the data was crunched, those children who tested low on the IQ tests grew up to be adults who were racist. It also showed that the people with lower cognitive abilities had less social contact with people of other races.
Gordon Hodson of Brock University in St. Catherine’s, Ontario, Canada and his colleague Michael A. Busseri, examined these and other studies. Their findings were published as Bright Minds and Dark Attitudes: Lower Cognitive Ability Predicts Greater Prejudice Through Right-Wing Ideology and Low Intergroup Contact.


“This finding is consistent with recent research demonstrating that inter-group contact is mentally challenging and cognitively draining, and consistent with findings that contact reduces prejudice.”

The point here is that one’s cognitive ability determines how easily one can grasp complexities and that right-wing extremist ideologies (and racism) cater to this handicap. Of course, extremist left-wing ideologies can fall into this trap as well, but few of them are as harmful as right-wing ones. For example, a right-wing view that all foreigners are scary and wish us harm becomes everyone is kind and wishes us well through one left-wing prism. One of these things is not like the other, though.


“Socially conservative ideologies tend to offer structure and order,” Hodson said, explaining why these beliefs might draw those with low intelligence. “Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice.”

Further, these findings may relate to homophobia as well. In another U.S. study, Hodson and Busseri compared 254 people who had the same level of education but possessed different levels of abstract reasoning. They found that people whose abstract reasoning abilities were poor tended to be homophobic. Just like in the U.K. study, these people had also had less contact with gays and were more accepting of authoritarianism.

Dr. Brian Nosek, a University of Virginia psychologist, says that the findings are correlational, hence they can’t conclusively prove that low IQs lead to prejudice. The studies would have to compare identical people, which is not possible. But it does point to the idea that people who lack the cognitive ability to process complexity tend to adhere to strict ideologies:


“Reality is complicated and messy. Ideologies get rid of the messiness and impose a simpler solution. So, it may not be surprising that people with less cognitive capacity will be attracted to simplifying ideologies.” (source)

This is not to say that all conservatives are dumb or that all liberals are smart. That’s far too simplistic a conclusion to draw. But the predominance of extremist right-wing ideology amongst those with a low-IQ is too common to ignore.

Another interesting study has shown a correlation between American symbols or cues – such as the flag or the word, “patriot” – and increased aggression in judging other people. These cues also increased the subject’s tendency to fall back onto war imagery and language. This occurred regardless of political affiliation or other factors. So when Fox News (or any other network) precedes a story with one of these cues, it tends to increase their viewer’s aggression towards who or whatever the subject of the report may be. Explains a lot, doesn’t it?

What can we conclude from these studies? Strictly speaking, they have their flaws but, overall, I believe that they have been able to draw a connection between low IQ in the form of reasoning and abstract thought and racism and authoritarian ideologies. From here, perhaps we should try to teach children how better to reason and extrapolate as well as to empathize with others. Hopefully, those who have a vested interest in keeping people stupid won’t be able to block these efforts. And if they do, then parents, it’s up to you. Teach your children well.


We knew, all the long. - poet
 
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/0...w-iq-and-right-wing-ideology-go-hand-in-hand/

Okay now, liberals, don’t get all smug and conservatives, don’t get defensive. The studies hit a hot-button trifecta – examining intelligence, racism and ideology – and our ability to remain objective may be strained. But… it is what it is so let’s dive right in.

The first studies of the correlation between intelligence and racism were done in the U.K. and involved children born in 1958 and another group born in 1970. The children’s intelligence was tested at age 10-11 and at age 30-33, their levels of social conservatism were measured. Verbal and nonverbal intelligence at the early ages was gauged using words, symbols and shapes. The later tests used four methods of testing cognitive abilities. The average IQ for comparison was set at 100.

The adults were given statements with which to agree or disagree dealing with social issues such as women working outside the home and what children should be taught in school. They also answered questions as to whether or not they’d work with people of other races. Once the data was crunched, those children who tested low on the IQ tests grew up to be adults who were racist. It also showed that the people with lower cognitive abilities had less social contact with people of other races.
Gordon Hodson of Brock University in St. Catherine’s, Ontario, Canada and his colleague Michael A. Busseri, examined these and other studies. Their findings were published as Bright Minds and Dark Attitudes: Lower Cognitive Ability Predicts Greater Prejudice Through Right-Wing Ideology and Low Intergroup Contact.


“This finding is consistent with recent research demonstrating that inter-group contact is mentally challenging and cognitively draining, and consistent with findings that contact reduces prejudice.”

The point here is that one’s cognitive ability determines how easily one can grasp complexities and that right-wing extremist ideologies (and racism) cater to this handicap. Of course, extremist left-wing ideologies can fall into this trap as well, but few of them are as harmful as right-wing ones. For example, a right-wing view that all foreigners are scary and wish us harm becomes everyone is kind and wishes us well through one left-wing prism. One of these things is not like the other, though.


“Socially conservative ideologies tend to offer structure and order,” Hodson said, explaining why these beliefs might draw those with low intelligence. “Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice.”

Further, these findings may relate to homophobia as well. In another U.S. study, Hodson and Busseri compared 254 people who had the same level of education but possessed different levels of abstract reasoning. They found that people whose abstract reasoning abilities were poor tended to be homophobic. Just like in the U.K. study, these people had also had less contact with gays and were more accepting of authoritarianism.

Dr. Brian Nosek, a University of Virginia psychologist, says that the findings are correlational, hence they can’t conclusively prove that low IQs lead to prejudice. The studies would have to compare identical people, which is not possible. But it does point to the idea that people who lack the cognitive ability to process complexity tend to adhere to strict ideologies:


“Reality is complicated and messy. Ideologies get rid of the messiness and impose a simpler solution. So, it may not be surprising that people with less cognitive capacity will be attracted to simplifying ideologies.” (source)

This is not to say that all conservatives are dumb or that all liberals are smart. That’s far too simplistic a conclusion to draw. But the predominance of extremist right-wing ideology amongst those with a low-IQ is too common to ignore.

Another interesting study has shown a correlation between American symbols or cues – such as the flag or the word, “patriot” – and increased aggression in judging other people. These cues also increased the subject’s tendency to fall back onto war imagery and language. This occurred regardless of political affiliation or other factors. So when Fox News (or any other network) precedes a story with one of these cues, it tends to increase their viewer’s aggression towards who or whatever the subject of the report may be. Explains a lot, doesn’t it?

What can we conclude from these studies? Strictly speaking, they have their flaws but, overall, I believe that they have been able to draw a connection between low IQ in the form of reasoning and abstract thought and racism and authoritarian ideologies. From here, perhaps we should try to teach children how better to reason and extrapolate as well as to empathize with others. Hopefully, those who have a vested interest in keeping people stupid won’t be able to block these efforts. And if they do, then parents, it’s up to you. Teach your children well.


We knew, all the long. - poet

You're just posting another racist study done by Black racists and race baiters.
 
Hello, new poster here. I believe these types of so called "studies" are just propaganda rather than information with the intent to educate. There is obviously a political agenda here. Best to ignore blatant agenda driven propaganda.
 
There is a link between uneducated stupidity and falling for online studies that can be taken apart by children.

Here is what these biased morons stated: “...individuals with lower cognitive abilities may gravitate toward more socially conservative right-wing ideologies that maintain the status quo and provide psychological stability and a sense of order...is consistent with findings that less intelligent children come to endorse more socially conservative ideologies as adults."

Now how did they ascertain the children's intelligence? An IQ test? No. Any form of standardized testing? No. They unscientifically quizzed the children, and then assigned a level of intelligence. Their manufactured "intelligence" tests were only matching shapes and corresponding symbols and recalling numbers from a series. This is unscientific and worthless screw-up number one.

There is no mention of the size test group, only what they started with over fifty years ago. This is unscientific and worthless screw-up number two.

There were only thirteen questions asked; a few of the questions:

Schools should teach children to obey authority.

Family life suffers if mum is working full-time.

None of the political parties would do anything to benefit me.

Being single provides more time to experience life and find out about yourself.

The answers to these questions were what these biased morons determined as "conservative" and "racist." So these biased morons just determined who the racist, conservative, and intelligent were with a method less scientific or credible than throwing darts at a board.

If you need more details on "p" value and sample size on this type of testing, I can further humiliate you for posting this fraudulent article.
 
Hello, new poster here. I believe these types of so called "studies" are just propaganda rather than information with the intent to educate. There is obviously a political agenda here. Best to ignore blatant agenda driven propaganda.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, for whatever it is worth. Stick around here long enough and you will change your opinion, as most conservatives here are low on the I.Q. and high on the BS.
 
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, for whatever it is worth. Stick around here long enough and you will change your opinion, as most conservatives here are low on the I.Q. and high on the BS.

Your positioining yourself out front as a forum spokesman reveals low self esteem. You must get your manipulative butt kicked regularly.
 
Your positioining yourself out front as a forum spokesman reveals low self esteem. You must get your manipulative butt kicked regularly.

Oh, forgive me....I thought I was dealing with someone with a modicum of objectivity and intelligence. I am no forum spokesman. And you are no armchair psychologist. Manipulative? LOLOLOL. You have all of 9 posts, to my 8k plus. Why don't you sit back and observe before you shoot off your mouth? Better to be thought a fool, than to open one's mouth, or post, and remove all doubt.
 
Why do you ban people? Can't compete?

Uh, you're barking up the wrong tree. I'm not the one. I didn't start the practice of banning folks from my threads.....I merely, "followed suit". It's the lowlife conservatives that can't compete with the liberals here. Since they can't engage in discourse or debate, without ad hominem attacks, as you have just presented, I have them mostly on ignore and since they have nothing worthwhile to contribute, they are banned. Moron.
 
Oh, forgive me....I thought I was dealing with someone with a modicum of objectivity and intelligence. I am no forum spokesman. And you are no armchair psychologist. Manipulative? LOLOLOL. You have all of 9 posts, to my 8k plus. Why don't you sit back and observe before you shoot off your mouth? Better to be thought a fool, than to open one's mouth, or post, and remove all doubt.

Naw. I'm ready for you. Why do you ban people? Lack of self esteem?
 
Oh, forgive me....I thought I was dealing with someone with a modicum of objectivity and intelligence. I am no forum spokesman. And you are no armchair psychologist. Manipulative? LOLOLOL. You have all of 9 posts, to my 8k plus. Why don't you sit back and observe before you shoot off your mouth? Better to be thought a fool, than to open one's mouth, or post, and remove all doubt.


You found that out pretty quickly didn't you.....lol

If you ban everyone but the Dude, Zappy, howey and desh, you can all take turns being the circle jerk.....
 
Naw. I'm ready for you. Why do you ban people? Lack of self esteem?

Illogical conclusion. Banning has nothing to do with lack of self esteem. My esteem is intact. In fact, I'm superior to most here. See?

Ready? Bitch, I don't play with or tolerate children. You better ask somebody.
 
You found that out pretty quickly didn't you.....lol

If you ban everyone but the Dude, Zappy, howey and desh, you can all take turns being the circle jerk.....

Darling....I don't dyke. I leave that to you frustrated, sexually infantile miscreants. Felcher.
 
Illogical conclusion. Banning has nothing to do with lack of self esteem. My esteem is intact. In fact, I'm superior to most here. See?

Ready? Bitch, I don't play with or tolerate children. You better ask somebody.

Darling....I don't dyke. I leave that to you frustrated, sexually infantile miscreants. Felcher.


All it takes is one or two posts of mine, and Poet reveals his inner brilliance for us to marvel at.....lol
 
Back
Top