Another school shooting today

[Into the Night]

Florida State shooting live updates: 2 dead, sheriff deputy’s son in custody

At least one person is dead and another is in custody after an active shooter was reported at Florida State University's campus in Tallahassee.

www.nbcnews.com

And that comes after a high school yesterday in Dallas

At one time a school shooting was a tragedy, today, it’s as American as apple pie, here today, gone tomorrow, happens so often now Americans have become desensitized

And the right’s solution, more guns, and easier access, to more guns

The school was yet another "gun free zone". No guns exist there, anchovies!

 

[Into the Night]

Yeah pointing out the tragedy of repeating school shootings due to the idiocy of guns in America makes one a “MAGA hater,” not surprising

But the school was a "gun free zone". There ARE no guns for a mass shooter to use, anchovies!

 

[Into the Night]

20,000+ gun laws on the books across the country, all intended to make access to guns as difficult as possible, yet you still whine that it isn't enough. maybe because safety is not your objective, but disarmament is. you obviously are not serious about keeping kids safe because you constantly dismiss hardening school security.

They TAKE AWAY from school security by imposing "gun free zones".

 

[Into the Night]

Current gun laws are useless, nearly anyone who wants a gun can get a gun, as I’ve shown before, you can even get one on the regular web

Ever conversation regarding gun regulation with gun lovers always comes down to their fear someone is going to confiscate their weapons, not necessary, sensible gun regulation is possible

And you can make schools Fort Knox but it won’t alter the danger, too many targets, shooters can switch from schools to senior citizen home or an array of potential targets

But the school was a "gun free zone", anchovies. No guns were there!

 

[Into the Night]

Chicago is a twenty minute ride from the Indiana border, plus, the Iron Pipeline exports guns to all the northern cities with stricter gun laws, it’s all about accessibility, sheer number of guns out there, and the easy access to those guns

Every mass shooting has three common variables: the shooter, the target, the gun. No way anyone can predict the next shooter, and the targets are too many to defend them all. The only controllable variable is the gun that makes it all possible

There was no gun, anchovies. The school was a "gun free zone"!

 

[Into the Night]

I was under the impression that Texas is a very red state. I won't visit there because of its stupidity.

Texas is not Dallas, Sybil.

 

[Into the Night]

Not true, Indiana has higher rates of gun violence than even the whole State of Illinois (https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/gun-violence-by-state)

In fact, State’s with stricter gun regulation have less gun violence rates than States with loose gun laws (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_death_and_violence_in_the_United_States_by_state)

But the gun violence took place in a "gun free zone", anchovies! You're a liar!

 

[Into the Night]

What's YOUR solution, anchovies?

It's obvious. Gun free zones. He thinks guns can't exist in one!

 

[Into the Night]

Statistics are now “feelings?” Facts are facts

And as far as “feelings,” you need to buy a mirror

Argument from randU fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. Go learn what 'fact' means.

The shooting took place in a "gun free zone", so you're a liar.
Your hoplophobia is YOUR problem.

 

[Into the Night]

You can look all you like, but you, nor anyone, can predict the next shooter, nor their target, but one can control that which makes it all possible, the gun

Nope. You can't control the gun.
They are just too easy to make. So is their ammunition.

The shootings took place in "gun free zones". You're a liar.

 

[Into the Night]

It's possible. If it comes down to giving up one of my guns? Absolutely!

Any law restricting guns in any way in the United States is unconstitutional, so all you are doing is 'breaking' an unconstitutional 'law'.

 

[gfm7175]

It's obvious. Gun free zones. He thinks guns can't exist in one!

hahaha that's funny stuff! He probably also thinks that deer can only cross the road wherever there's a 'deer crossing' sign.

 

[gfm7175]

You can look all you like, but you, nor anyone, can predict the next shooter, nor their target,

be veryyyyyyyy veryyyyyyyyyy afraidddddddddd

but one can control that which makes it all possible, the gun

What's your solution, anchovies?? More "defenselessness zone" signage?

 

[archives]

Nope. You can't control the gun.
They are just too easy to make. So is their ammunition.

The shootings took place in "gun free zones". You're a liar.

Not the gun, but rather access to the gun, and no zone is free from gun violence if next door there is a gun free zone

If all you got to offer is the same lame “arguments,” save us all some time and re-educate yourself on what are fallacies

 

[archives]

be veryyyyyyyy veryyyyyyyyyy afraidddddddddd

What's your solution, anchovies?? More "defenselessness zone" signage?

Not affraid, I love in a gun regulating State, and my own personal way to address the problem is to treat guns like we do vehicles to include ownership tests, operational requirements, and especially liability insurance

 

[Into the Night]

Not the gun, but rather access to the gun, and no zone is free from gun violence if next door there is a gun free zone

So you lock yourself into another paradox, anchovies. You cannot argue both sides of any paradox. It's irrational.

If all you got to offer is the same lame “arguments,” save us all some time and re-educate yourself on what are fallacies

You can't blame your fallacies on anybody else, anchovies. The same arguments come from the same Constitution that you deny and discard and from the same right of self defense that you deny and discard (and which you can't take from ANYONE).

You're a little tyrant...a nothing...with a bad case of hoplophobia.

 

[Into the Night]

Not affraid, I love in a gun regulating State, and my own personal way to address the problem is to treat guns like we do vehicles to include ownership tests, operational requirements, and especially liability insurance

You are still locked in this paradox, anchovies. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.
You ARE afraid. It's obvious. You're a liar, anchovies.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You can look all you like, but you, nor anyone, can predict the next shooter, nor their target, but one can control that which makes it all possible, the gun

it hasn't worked so far, so what more do you suggest?

 

[gfm7175]

Not affraid,

Yes, you are.

I love in a gun regulating State,

Any school shootings in your state?

and my own personal way to address the problem is to treat guns like we do vehicles to include ownership tests, operational requirements, and especially liability insurance

How would any of that reduce school shootings?

 

[archives]

So you lock yourself into another paradox, anchovies. You cannot argue both sides of any paradox. It's irrational.

You can't blame your fallacies on anybody else, anchovies. The same arguments come from the same Constitution that you deny and discard and from the same right of self defense that you deny and discard (and which you can't take from ANYONE).

You're a little tyrant...a nothing...with a bad case of hoplophobia.

Didn’t

And as usual, your’s was the same lame fallacy bullshit aimed at deflection off of the issue under discussion

NEXT