Another PHONY RightWng "scandal" Goes Poof!

PostmodernProphet said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
SHE'D HAD TO WILLFULLY EXCHANGE THOSE EMAILS WITH FOLK NOT IN THE LOOP OF AUTHORIZED OFFICIALS, WHICH SHE DIDN'T DO.
Click to expand...



the FBI said she did......are denying it?.....
Click to expand...


Really? Provide the quote from Comey that says such....I don't want yours or some pundits supposition and conjecture...I want the EXACT QUOTE STATING EXACTLY WHAT YOU ASSERT. If you can't do that, then grow up and just admit you're wrong on this point.
 
Ralph said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
I just pointing to the facts, you insipidly stubborn jackass.....3 INVESTIGATIONS, and the best the GOP can come up with is that she was careless! NOTHING SHE DID CONTRIBUTED TO THE DEATHS IN BENGHAZI OR BROACHED NATIONAL SECURITY.....FOR CRIMINAL CHARGES TO BE FILED, SHE'D HAD TO WILLFULLY EXCHANGE THOSE EMAILS WITH FOLK NOT IN THE LOOP OF AUTHORIZED OFFICIALS, WHICH SHE DIDN'T DO.

But if you want to jerk off on her lying she turned over all e-mails or didn't use her personal server (after which she fully complied with the investigation) go right ahead....it's just another GOP hollow victory like Whitewater leading to an article of impeachment for Slick Willy.

None of this will keep the people from realizing that their alternative to Hillary is Trump...who makes her look like a piker in the dishonesty category. Deal with it.
Click to expand...


Being "Careless" with top secret Intelligence Communications.....is a CRIME worthy of indictment, especially if its the Sec. of State that is found guilty of being careless. Now she is seeking the JOB as TOP LAW ENFORCEMENT executive in this republic...after admitting to her IGNORANCE OF THE LAW? Really? All she is guilty of is CARELESSNESS? And you want this self confessed ignorant careless person enforcing law and commanding all our military might? Do you not think that this republic has suffered enough at the hands of careless and ignorant politicians?

This is just like voting for Obama...who told everyone his sworn duty (as defined by himself) was to fundamentally CHANGE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA....into a bankrupt welfare socialist banana republic...and YOU VOTED FOR HIM anyway because he was black and articulate? Really? Enough with the STUPID.
Click to expand...


See folks, when faced with the FACTS, Ralphie just doubles down on his supposition and conjecture laden rhetoric. Like all intellectually impotent neocon/teabagger/fibbertarians, Ralphie doesn't have the stones to concede a point. Comey had the cojones to chastise, but point out that NO CRIMINIAL ACTION, WILLFUL OR OTHERWISE, WAS DONE. Prior to this, the GOP praised Comey for his professional, objective and thoroughness. Now their chickens have come home to roost in that respect, and they don't like it.

Ralphie's last paragraph comes off like some drunken idiotic Red state rummy having a meltdown at his local bar after the 2008 and 2012 elections. Pathetic.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
GOP lead senate investigations came to the same conclusions...WTF is your problem?
Click to expand...

it is true that all three investigations came to the conclusion that she lied about the motive for the attack in Benghazi and she lied about her emails to the investigators....do you disagree with the facts all three investigations uncovered?.....
Click to expand...

you did this dance step already, ya post modern fool....and you're just repeating the failed distortions of the right wing punditry that IGNORE THE FACTS. What's this BS about Clinton lying about the attackers motivations? What mental flatulence from Limbaugh did you sniff that one from? And what was the "lie"? As to the e-mails....Comey stated that any actions on that was NOT his venue or jurisdiction...and like I told ya chuckles, the BEST you dummies can hope to jerk off to is something akin to an article of impeachment against Slick Willy...which did NOTHING but waste taxpayers money...just like the GOP is doing now.

Bottom line: Hillary was NOT responsible for the deaths in Benghazi in any way, shape or matter...nor did her e-mails on personal computer break any laws or compromise national security. The GOP Senate Committees said it, the FBI said it. So run-a-long and repeat your moot points and lies ad nausea....that's all you're good for anyway.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Remember, Colin Powell said he did the same thing .
Click to expand...

Politifact says that is a lie.....are you claiming Politifact is wrong?.....
Click to expand...

they said mostly false in her general statement, stupid. Then they went on to point out this: We should note that the State Department has flagged a handful of emails containing information now deemed classified that were received by Powell and aides to Rice at private email addresses. Learn to read carefully and comprehensively. Powell personally copped to his fopaux for the national record. Politifact noted the following on that:

Like Clinton, Powell used a personal email address. However, there’s a big difference: Clinton hosted her email on a private server located in her home. Powell did not.

But remember, the big hoo-hah was that ANY personal email address was OFFICIALLY not to be used for material regarding official State Dept. business, as it could contain sensitive or classified material. So again, you wet dream is just that...a dream. Carry on beating his dead horse.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Really? Provide the quote from Comey that says such....I don't want yours or some pundits supposition and conjecture...I want the EXACT QUOTE STATING EXACTLY WHAT YOU ASSERT. If you can't do that, then grow up and just admit you're wrong on this point.
Click to expand...

since everyone that can read already knows Comey stated several times that she lied there is no need to go and find it again.....I am just curious why you think nobody knows about it........
 
Taichiliberal said:
What's this BS about Clinton lying about the attackers motivations?
Click to expand...

at any point in time do you remember anyone claiming that the attack happened because of a You Tube video?......or has that completely slipped your mind?.....because the chronology of events shows that Hillary was lying her ass off before the last American died in Benghazi......you've heard about chronologies of events, right?.....
 
Taichiliberal said:
they said mostly false in her general statement, stupid.
Click to expand...

let me guess....you thought that meant it was true, right?....

We should note that the State Department has flagged a handful of emails containing information now deemed classified that were received by Powell
Click to expand...

oh, so unlike Hillary he didn't send any but someone sent some to him?......was Hillary the one who sent them to him?......I heard she sent a lot of them........
 
Taichiliberal said:
See folks, when faced with the FACTS, Ralphie just doubles down on his supposition and conjecture laden rhetoric. Like all intellectually impotent neocon/teabagger/fibbertarians, Ralphie doesn't have the stones to concede a point. Comey had the cojones to chastise, but point out that NO CRIMINIAL ACTION, WILLFUL OR OTHERWISE, WAS DONE. Prior to this, the GOP praised Comey for his professional, objective and thoroughness. Now their chickens have come home to roost in that respect, and they don't like it.

Ralphie's last paragraph comes off like some drunken idiotic Red state rummy having a meltdown at his local bar after the 2008 and 2012 elections. Pathetic.
Click to expand...

Conjecture? So.....when confronted with the objective, testable words located within the law as written in 18 USC 793.....you present the false premise that its nothing but conjecture and your evidence is the fact that an Obama administration official refused to enforce that code? Really?

Except the US CODE declares: ( I always double down on the demonstrable truth), carelessness (willful or not) and/or ignorance are "indictable" crimes under US LAW. Some flunky .....cannot amend the law to suit his bosses agenda, but that does not stop them from trying....why? Its simple, KOOL AID DRINKERS are ignorant an believe anything they are instructed to believe....they have no capacity for "CRITICAL INDEPENDENT THINKING".

FYI: Rhetoric is talking bullshit void of presenting the least bit of objective evidence (like you in, wink wink, DOUBLING DOWN on an FBI agents personal omission of the code)....i.e., Ad Hominem personal attacks are simply a stupid persons way of talking to hear their own head rattle. I have yet to see a liberal that can defend their position via a presentation of testable evidences without resorting to the Alinsky catch all.....the attempted character assassination by Ad Hominem personal attack. LMAO. What part of 18 USC 793 do you find NON OBJECTIVE?

Read the code its not the least bit ambiguous. 18 USC 793......negligence is a "felony". What part of "carelessness do you not comprehend? There is no "excuse" for IGNORANCE of the LAW.....loop holes.
 
Last edited:
PostmodernProphet said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
See folks, when put on the spot right wing puppets like the Postmodernfool don't have the intellectual honesty or courage to concede a point. Instead, like the petulant child he is, the Postmodernfool will just repeat a dodge moot point or some smokescreen blown up his butt by Fox Noise. Sad, but not unexpected.
Click to expand...


????....are you still pretending she hasn't lied?......you must be one of the 3% that still believes her.......
Click to expand...

keep going, stupid....you keep proving my point to the readers every time. the chronology of the posts makes you out to be the Post Modern Fool of the right wing noise machine. Carry on.
 
Ralph said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
See folks, when faced with the FACTS, Ralphie just doubles down on his supposition and conjecture laden rhetoric. Like all intellectually impotent neocon/teabagger/fibbertarians, Ralphie doesn't have the stones to concede a point. Comey had the cojones to chastise, but point out that NO CRIMINIAL ACTION, WILLFUL OR OTHERWISE, WAS DONE. Prior to this, the GOP praised Comey for his professional, objective and thoroughness. Now their chickens have come home to roost in that respect, and they don't like it.

Ralphie's last paragraph comes off like some drunken idiotic Red state rummy having a meltdown at his local bar after the 2008 and 2012 elections. Pathetic.
Click to expand...


Conjecture? So.....when confronted with the objective, testable words located within the law as written in 18 USC 793.....you present the false premise that its nothing but conjecture and your evidence is the fact that an Obama administration official refused to enforce that code? Really?

Except the US CODE declares: ( I always double down on the demonstrable truth), carelessness (willful or not) and/or ignorance are "indictable" crimes under US LAW. Some flunky .....cannot amend the law to suit his bosses agenda, but that does not stop them from trying....why? Its simple, KOOL AID DRINKERS are ignorant an believe anything they are instructed to believe....they have no capacity for "CRITICAL INDEPENDENT THINKING".

FYI: Rhetoric is talking bullshit void of presenting the least bit of objective evidence (like you in, wink wink, DOUBLING DOWN on an FBI agents personal omission of the code)....i.e., Ad Hominem personal attacks are simply a stupid persons way of talking to hear their own head rattle. I have yet to see a liberal that can defend their position via a presentation of testable evidences without resorting to the Alinsky catch all.....the attempted character assassination by Ad Hominem personal attack. LMAO. What part of 18 USC 793 do you find NON OBJECTIVE?

Read the code its not the least bit ambiguous. 18 USC 793......negligence is a "felony". What part of "carelessness do you not comprehend? There is no "excuse" for IGNORANCE of the LAW.....loop holes.
Click to expand...

Learn to read carefully and comprehensively, Ralphie boy....because a phrase that is oft repeated in that code is "with intent". https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793 As Comey stated time and again that in this particular case, sloppiness and carelessness DOES NOT equate criminal action, willful or otherwise.

You're living proof that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, Ralphie. Like all right wing ideologues, your mind stops working the second you read something you like, and then you ignore the rest. Unfortunately for you, Comey is not so willfully ignorant of ALL the facts. Carry on.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
let me guess....you thought that meant it was true, right?....



oh, so unlike Hillary he didn't send any but someone sent some to him?......was Hillary the one who sent them to him?......I heard she sent a lot of them........
Click to expand...

Stop guessing, jackass. the chronology of the posts makes you out to be the right wing toady that you are, because you just omit what you don't like. Here's my full response: they said mostly false in her general statement, stupid. Then they went on to point out this: We should note that the State Department has flagged a handful of emails containing information now deemed classified that were received by Powell and aides to Rice at private email addresses. Learn to read carefully and comprehensively. Powell personally copped to his fopaux for the national record. Politifact noted the following on that:

Like Clinton, Powell used a personal email address. However, there’s a big difference: Clinton hosted her email on a private server located in her home. Powell did not.

But remember, the big hoo-hah was that ANY personal email address was OFFICIALLY not to be used for material regarding official State Dept. business, as it could contain sensitive or classified material. So again, you wet dream is just that...a dream. Carry on beating his dead horse.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
What's this BS about Clinton lying about the attackers motivations?
Click to expand...

at any point in time do you remember anyone claiming that the attack happened because of a You Tube video?......or has that completely slipped your mind?.....because the chronology of events shows that Hillary was lying her ass off before the last American died in Benghazi......you've heard about chronologies of events, right?.....
Click to expand...

Prove it, jackass....post the video or relate the article from a reputable source that DOESN'T take out-of-context quotes.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Really? Provide the quote from Comey that says such....I don't want yours or some pundits supposition and conjecture...I want the EXACT QUOTE STATING EXACTLY WHAT YOU ASSERT. If you can't do that, then grow up and just admit you're wrong on this point.
Click to expand...

since everyone that can read already knows Comey stated several times that she lied there is no need to go and find it again.....I am just curious why you think nobody knows about it........
Click to expand...


And once again, when put on the spot to pony up FACTS to back up his opinions, supposition and conjecture, the Post Modern Fool just blows more smoke. Typical empty headed neocon toadie with delusions of intelligence. He's done....but let's watch him sputter and fume with repetitions of the SOS.
 
Taichiliberal said:
they said mostly false in her general statement, stupid. Then they went on to point out this: We should note that the State Department has flagged a handful of emails containing information now deemed classified that were received by Powell and aides to Rice at private email addresses. Learn to read carefully and comprehensively. Powell personally copped to his fopaux for the national record. Politifact noted the following on that:

Like Clinton, Powell used a personal email address. However, there’s a big difference: Clinton hosted her email on a private server located in her home. Powell did not.

But remember, the big hoo-hah was that ANY personal email address was OFFICIALLY not to be used for material regarding official State Dept. business, as it could contain sensitive or classified material. So again, you wet dream is just that...a dream. Carry on beating his dead horse.
Click to expand...

So they were RECEIVED by Powell...and RECEIVED by aides to Rice....

What the fucks your point....Do Powell or Rice's aides have control over who sends them email ???

Maybe its you that needs to learn to read carefully and comprehensively.

Clinton actually SEND classified emails from her unsecured server.....
FBI Probe Contradicts Clinton's Claim She Never Sent Classified Emails
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-...hillary-clintons-past-email/story?id=40350589

 
Taichiliberal said:
Learn to read carefully and comprehensively, Ralphie boy....because a phrase that is oft repeated in that code is "with intent". https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793 As Comey stated time and again that in this particular case, sloppiness and carelessness DOES NOT equate criminal action, willful or otherwise.

You're living proof that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, Ralphie. Like all right wing ideologues, your mind stops working the second you read something you like, and then you ignore the rest. Unfortunately for you, Comey is not so willfully ignorant of ALL the facts. Carry on.
Click to expand...
INTENT mentioned in (a) and (b) only....

NO intent required in these

(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or

(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or


(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.




So again.... learn to read carefully and comprehensively and stop making as ass of yourself.....



Next time you get stopped speeding, try telling the cop you had no INTENT to speed...see how far that stupid excuse gets you....
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
keep going, stupid....you keep proving my point to the readers every time. the chronology of the posts makes you out to be the Post Modern Fool of the right wing noise machine. Carry on.
Click to expand...

actually the chronology of the posts show we've known Hillary lied about her emails a long time ago.......
 
Taichiliberal said:
Stop guessing, jackass. the chronology of the posts makes you out to be the right wing toady that you are, because you just omit what you don't like. Here's my full response: they said mostly false in her general statement, stupid. Then they went on to point out this: We should note that the State Department has flagged a handful of emails containing information now deemed classified that were received by Powell and aides to Rice at private email addresses. Learn to read carefully and comprehensively. Powell personally copped to his fopaux for the national record. Politifact noted the following on that:

Like Clinton, Powell used a personal email address. However, there’s a big difference: Clinton hosted her email on a private server located in her home. Powell did not.

But remember, the big hoo-hah was that ANY personal email address was OFFICIALLY not to be used for material regarding official State Dept. business, as it could contain sensitive or classified material. So again, you wet dream is just that...a dream. Carry on beating his dead horse.
Click to expand...

correct, what Hillary said was mostly false.....we all knew that.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top